Hi, Bruno. Congratulations on your work. It seems to me it would be a wonderful dissertation.
First of all, I would not do just a bass clef notation, as this is not for theorbo, but a 10 course lute. Secondly, I think in the world of academia, the double staff notation, i.e. keyboard notation, would be more universally understood by those reading your paper. I personally would avoid the single-line guitar notation in e, for the purposes for dissertation. Perhaps a later volume in e might be published for guitarists. ed At 08:46 AM 1/6/2010, Bruno Correia wrote: > Could anybody give his/her opinion about this issue: > > > > At the moment I am analysing the Kapsperger 1611 lute book for my Doc. > dissertation. All the musical examples will be written with Django tab > writer adding (automatically) its transcription. My question is: should > the transcription be written on a single or double staff (treble and > bass clefs)? I think that a single staff is more economical... > > > > I thought for a moment to transcribe it in (e) in order to easy the > access to guitarists, but perhaps its just a fool idea. After all they > don't have the deep basses (10 course). > > > > Appreciate any comments. > > -- > > >To get on or off this list see list information at >http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html Edward Martin 2817 East 2nd Street Duluth, Minnesota 55812 e-mail: [email protected] voice: (218) 728-1202 http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1660298871&ref=name http://www.myspace.com/edslute
