Thank you very much Edward. I'll be working very hard to complete it
this year.
You are right about the double staff. John Griffiths has just given the
same advice.
Best wishes.
2010/1/6 Edward Martin <[1...@gamutstrings.com>
Hi, Bruno.
Congratulations on your work. It seems to me it would be a
wonderful dissertation.
First of all, I would not do just a bass clef notation, as this is
not for theorbo, but a 10 course lute. Secondly, I think in the
world of academia, the double staff notation, i.e. keyboard
notation, would be more universally understood by those reading your
paper.
I personally would avoid the single-line guitar notation in e, for
the purposes for dissertation. Perhaps a later volume in e might be
published for guitarists.
ed
At 08:46 AM 1/6/2010, Bruno Correia wrote:
Could anybody give his/her opinion about this issue:
At the moment I am analysing the Kapsperger 1611 lute book for my
Doc.
dissertation. All the musical examples will be written with Django
tab
writer adding (automatically) its transcription. My question is:
should
the transcription be written on a single or double staff (treble
and
bass clefs)? I think that a single staff is more economical...
I thought for a moment to transcribe it in (e) in order to easy
the
access to guitarists, but perhaps its just a fool idea. After all
they
don't have the deep basses (10 course).
Appreciate any comments.
--
To get on or off this list see list information at
[2]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
Edward Martin
2817 East 2nd Street
Duluth, Minnesota 55812
e-mail: [3...@gamutstrings.com
voice: (218) 728-1202
[4]http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1660298871&ref=name
[5]http://www.myspace.com/edslute
--
References
1. mailto:e...@gamutstrings.com
2. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
3. mailto:e...@gamutstrings.com
4. http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1660298871&ref=name
5. http://www.myspace.com/edslute
