I vote for two staves. It is more accurate and scholarly, IMHO.
Economical? What, are you worrying about inconveniencing a few
electrons? Or is it the paper? How many copies do you plan to print?
My YEN2
On Jan 6, 2010, at 11:46 PM, Bruno Correia wrote:
Could anybody give his/her opinion about this issue:
At the moment I am analysing the Kapsperger 1611 lute book for my
Doc.
dissertation. All the musical examples will be written with Django
tab
writer adding (automatically) its transcription. My question is:
should
the transcription be written on a single or double staff (treble and
bass clefs)? I think that a single staff is more economical...
I thought for a moment to transcribe it in (e) in order to easy the
access to guitarists, but perhaps its just a fool idea. After all
they
don't have the deep basses (10 course).
Appreciate any comments.
--
To get on or off this list see list information at
[1]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
Ed Durbrow
Saitama, Japan
[2][email protected]
[3]http://www9.plala.or.jp/edurbrow/
--
References
1. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
2. mailto:[email protected]
3. http://www9.plala.or.jp/edurbrow/
