Same argument ! Listen to the counterpoint... Best,
JM ================================= == En réponse au message du 24-11-2010, 11:27:59 == > > > >correction: Sorry, I meant the values of the second and third note of the >first motif respectively the first bar in general... > > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Susanne Herre" <[email protected]> >To: "Lute List" <[email protected]> >Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2010 10:49 AM >Subject: [LUTE] Francesco da Milano - Ness 33 > > >> Dear lute lovers, >> >> >> >> What are your opinions about the beginning of Francesco da Milano - >> Fantasia Ness 33 regarding the note value of the first note of the >> first motif? >> >> >> >> My thoughts at the moment are that maybe it happened like this: >> Francesco wrote the piece without bar lines. When they tried to print >> it with bar lines it was not possible or not common to print only an >> upbeat / a bar of half length. So they changed the rhythm to a very >> common pattern so the motif could now fit into one bar. >> >> >> >> Could that be possible? Maybe that happened with other pieces as well? >> >> >> >> Or maybe Francesco "had to" compose it like this because no piece like >> a fantasia or ricercar would start with an upbeat? >> >> >> >> Best wishes, >> >> >> >> Susanne >> >> -- >> >> >> To get on or off this list see list information at >> http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >Orange vous informe que cet e-mail a ete controle par l'anti-virus mail. >Aucun virus connu a ce jour par nos services n'a ete detecte. > > ========================================
