True, Peter. The Siena doesn't use the same rhythm in the answering statement. 
Arthur Ness gives the exact Siena version in tab and his transcription suggests 
a change to make both opening statements rhythmically identical. Moreover there 
is a version of this very Ricercar in an English manuscript, Cambridge Univ. 
Library, Add. Ms 3056, which changes the Siena version to make both statement 
conform, like Arthur suggested in his transcription. That's what I play, and it 
would be interesting to have Arthur's opinion on that...

All the best,

Jean-Marie
=================================
  
== En réponse au message du 24-11-2010, 13:21:18 ==

>
>   Looking at this piece in the Siena manuscript, the rhythm for the
>   opening statement is not the same as in the answering statements.  So
>   there's certainly room for doubt.
>
>   I think the opening statement may have been 'corrected' in the Ness
>   edition (I don't have it here to check).  However, since several
>   different rhythms are used for this motif, changing one of them doesn't
>   make the counterpoint any more uniform.  Let it stand, and enjoy the
>   diversity!
>
>   P
>   On 24 November 2010 10:33, Jean-Marie Poirier
>   <[1][email protected]> wrote:
>
>     Same argument ! Listen to the counterpoint...
>     Best,
>     JM
>     =================================
>     == En reponse au message du 24-11-2010, 11:27:59 ==
>
>   >
>   >
>   >
>   >correction: Sorry, I meant the values of the second and third note of
>   the
>   >first motif respectively the first bar in general...
>   >
>   >
>   >
>   >----- Original Message -----
>   >From: "Susanne Herre" <[2][email protected]>
>   >To: "Lute List" <[3][email protected]>
>   >Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2010 10:49 AM
>   >Subject: [LUTE] Francesco da Milano - Ness 33
>   >
>   >
>
>   >>   Dear lute lovers,
>   >>
>   >>
>   >>
>   >>   What are your opinions about the beginning of Francesco da Milano
>   -
>   >>   Fantasia Ness 33 regarding the note value of the first note of the
>   >>   first motif?
>   >>
>   >>
>   >>
>   >>   My thoughts at the moment are that maybe it happened like this:
>   >>   Francesco wrote the piece without bar lines. When they tried to
>   print
>   >>   it with bar lines it was not possible or not common to print only
>   an
>   >>   upbeat / a bar of half length. So they changed the rhythm to a
>   very
>   >>   common pattern so the motif could now fit into one bar.
>   >>
>   >>
>   >>
>   >>   Could that be possible? Maybe that happened with other pieces as
>   well?
>   >>
>   >>
>   >>
>   >>   Or maybe Francesco "had to" compose it like this because no piece
>   like
>   >>   a fantasia or ricercar would start with an upbeat?
>   >>
>   >>
>   >>
>   >>   Best wishes,
>   >>
>   >>
>   >>
>   >>   Susanne
>   >>
>   >>   --
>   >>
>   >>
>   >> To get on or off this list see list information at
>   >> [4]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
>   >
>   >
>   >----------------------------------------------------------------------
>   -----------------
>   >Orange vous informe que cet  e-mail a ete controle par l'anti-virus
>   mail.
>   >Aucun virus connu a ce jour par nos services n'a ete detecte.
>   >
>   >
>   ========================================
>
>   --
>   Peter Martin
>   24 The Mount St Georges
>   Second Avenue
>   Newcastle under Lyme
>   ST5 8RB
>   tel: 0044 (0)1782 662089
>   mob: 0044 (0)7971 232614
>   [5][email protected]
>
>   --
>
>References
>
>   1. mailto:[email protected]
>   2. mailto:[email protected]
>   3. mailto:[email protected]
>   4. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
>   5. mailto:[email protected]
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Orange vous informe que cet  e-mail a ete controle par l'anti-virus mail. 
>Aucun virus connu a ce jour par nos services n'a ete detecte.
>
>

========================================


Reply via email to