We should look also at the next piece in the Siena manuscript, La
   Compagna, which opens with the same theme and rhythm, suggesting that
   number 33 was written as intended, and doesn't need to be changed.
   That's what I play...... :)

   P
   On 24 November 2010 12:56, Jean-Marie Poirier
   <[1][email protected]> wrote:

     True, Peter. The Siena doesn't use the same rhythm in the answering
     statement. Arthur Ness gives the exact Siena version in tab and his
     transcription suggests a change to make both opening statements
     rhythmically identical. Moreover there is a version of this very
     Ricercar in an English manuscript, Cambridge Univ. Library, Add. Ms
     3056, which changes the Siena version to make both statement
     conform, like Arthur suggested in his transcription. That's what I
     play, and it would be interesting to have Arthur's opinion on
     that...

   All the best,
   Jean-Marie
   =================================

     == En reponse au message du 24-11-2010, 13:21:18 ==

   >
   >   Looking at this piece in the Siena manuscript, the rhythm for the
   >   opening statement is not the same as in the answering statements.
   So
   >   there's certainly room for doubt.
   >
   >   I think the opening statement may have been 'corrected' in the Ness
   >   edition (I don't have it here to check).  However, since several
   >   different rhythms are used for this motif, changing one of them
   doesn't
   >   make the counterpoint any more uniform.  Let it stand, and enjoy
   the
   >   diversity!
   >
   >   P
   >   On 24 November 2010 10:33, Jean-Marie Poirier
   >   <[1][2][email protected]> wrote:
   >
   >     Same argument ! Listen to the counterpoint...
   >     Best,
   >     JM
   >     =================================
   >     == En reponse au message du 24-11-2010, 11:27:59 ==
   >
   >   >
   >   >
   >   >
   >   >correction: Sorry, I meant the values of the second and third note
   of
   >   the
   >   >first motif respectively the first bar in general...
   >   >
   >   >
   >   >
   >   >----- Original Message -----
   >   >From: "Susanne Herre" <[2][3][email protected]>
   >   >To: "Lute List" <[3][4][email protected]>
   >   >Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2010 10:49 AM
   >   >Subject: [LUTE] Francesco da Milano - Ness 33
   >   >
   >   >
   >
   >   >>   Dear lute lovers,
   >   >>
   >   >>
   >   >>
   >   >>   What are your opinions about the beginning of Francesco da
   Milano
   >   -
   >   >>   Fantasia Ness 33 regarding the note value of the first note of
   the
   >   >>   first motif?
   >   >>
   >   >>
   >   >>
   >   >>   My thoughts at the moment are that maybe it happened like
   this:
   >   >>   Francesco wrote the piece without bar lines. When they tried
   to
   >   print
   >   >>   it with bar lines it was not possible or not common to print
   only
   >   an
   >   >>   upbeat / a bar of half length. So they changed the rhythm to a
   >   very
   >   >>   common pattern so the motif could now fit into one bar.
   >   >>
   >   >>
   >   >>
   >   >>   Could that be possible? Maybe that happened with other pieces
   as
   >   well?
   >   >>
   >   >>
   >   >>
   >   >>   Or maybe Francesco "had to" compose it like this because no
   piece
   >   like
   >   >>   a fantasia or ricercar would start with an upbeat?
   >   >>
   >   >>
   >   >>
   >   >>   Best wishes,
   >   >>
   >   >>
   >   >>
   >   >>   Susanne
   >   >>
   >   >>   --
   >   >>
   >   >>
   >   >> To get on or off this list see list information at
   >   >> [4][5]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   >   >
   >   >
   >
   >----------------------------------------------------------------------
   >   -----------------
   >   >Orange vous informe que cet  e-mail a ete controle par
   l'anti-virus
   >   mail.
   >   >Aucun virus connu a ce jour par nos services n'a ete detecte.
   >   >
   >   >
   >   ========================================
   >
   >   --
   >   Peter Martin
   >   24 The Mount St Georges
   >   Second Avenue
   >   Newcastle under Lyme
   >   ST5 8RB
   >   tel: 0044 (0)1782 662089
   >   mob: 0044 (0)7971 232614
   >   [5][6][email protected]
   >
   >   --
   >
   >References
   >
   >   1. mailto:[7][email protected]
   >   2. mailto:[8][email protected]
   >   3. mailto:[9][email protected]
   >   4. [10]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   >   5. mailto:[11][email protected]
   >

     >-------------------------------------------------------------------
     --------------------

   >Orange vous informe que cet  e-mail a ete controle par l'anti-virus
   mail.
   >Aucun virus connu a ce jour par nos services n'a ete detecte.
   >
   >
   ========================================

   --
   Peter Martin
   24 The Mount St Georges
   Second Avenue
   Newcastle under Lyme
   ST5 8RB
   tel: 0044 (0)1782 662089
   mob: 0044 (0)7971 232614
   [12][email protected]

   --

References

   1. mailto:[email protected]
   2. mailto:[email protected]
   3. mailto:[email protected]
   4. mailto:[email protected]
   5. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   6. mailto:[email protected]
   7. mailto:[email protected]
   8. mailto:[email protected]
   9. mailto:[email protected]
  10. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
  11. mailto:[email protected]
  12. mailto:[email protected]

Reply via email to