As we said many times when I was in college, 
  "pluck it!"
T
> Ron, I love your comment on this subject!  :-)
> 
> Arto
> 
> On 25/06/12 16:13, Ron Andrico wrote:
> >     I have to say, I'm always amused by these discussions that
> >     broadly outline the imprint of theoretical measurements on the
> >     phenomenon of sound.  If we look at all the factors, including
> >     thickness and stiffness of string material, variability in
> >     trueness of dimension, interference of temperature and humidity
> >     (and probably barometric pressure) on the transmission of sound,
> >     proximate acoustical deflections, damping caused by skin oils,
> >     distortion caused by finger pressure, variability caused by
> >     thickness of fret material, wave interference from nut, bridge,
> >     soundboard materials, etc.  Then there is the phenomenon that
> >     different ears hear the pitch differently. Where do we stop? I
> >     say train your ears and tune to the best of your ability. RA
> >     >  Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 13:24:40 +0100
> >     >  To: [email protected]
> >     >  From: [email protected]
> >     >  Subject: [LUTE] Re: Tuning
> >     >
> >     >  with apologies to those who aren't interested ;-)
> >     >
> >     >  For a plucked instrument the finger on the node is removed
> >     >  from the
> >     string just after the pluck. (otherwise the sound is damped)
> >     >
> >     >  Indeed, having sharp harmonics is a property of all strings
> >     >  outside
> >     the physics lesson, as any piano tuner knows.
> >     >
> >     >  Also, if you use an oscilloscope to view the waveform, and
> >     >  hit the
> >     harmonic partially so that some of the fundamental also sounds,
> >     you can see the waveform of the harmonic moving against that of
> >     the fundamental.
> >     >
> >     >  For a bowed instrument, I suspect the harmonics are in tune
> >     >  as long
> >     as the bow is driving the string.
> >     >
> >     >  andy
> >     >
> >     >  Philip Brown wrote:
> >     >  >  That may be true, but a more obvious cause would be that
> >     >  >  the total length of vibrating string is reduced by the
> >     >  >  width of the area of contact of the finger.
> >     >  >
> >     >  >  Cheers
> >     >  >
> >     >  >  Philip Brown
> >     >  >
> >     >  >  On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 9:00 AM,<[email protected]> 
> >     >  >  wrote:
> >     >  >>  They would be for a perfectly thin flexible string - but
> >     >  >>  string
> >     stiffness sharpens the higher harmonics.
> >     >  >>  Bill
> >     >
> >     >  >>  On 25 June 2012 09:39, andy
> >     >  >>  butler<[email protected]>  wrote:
> >     >  >>>  Harmonics on a plucked string are a little bit sharp,
> >     >  >>  Isn't it the case that harmonics are pure by definition?
> >     >  >>
> >     >  >>  David
> >     >  >>
> >     >
> >     >
> >     >
> >     >  To get on or off this list see list information at
> >     >  http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
> >
> >     --
> >
> 
> 


Tom Draughon
Heartistry Music
http://www.heartistrymusic.com/artists/tom.html
714  9th Avenue West
Ashland, WI  54806
715-682-9362


Reply via email to