I've been watching this discussion with interest and I wonder if it's
   feasible to produce a taxonomy of plucked stringed instruments?  In
   particular, is it possible to construct a 'key' with questions
   that distinguish one instrument from another, as botanists do with
   different kinds of orchid, for example?

   I simply throw this in as an idea - I'm NOT volunteering - I'm too old
   to dodge the huge amounts of flak that would result.

   Bill
   From: Lex van Sante <[email protected]>
   To: lute mailing list list <[email protected]>
   Sent: Wednesday, 17 October 2012, 21:17
   Subject: [LUTE] Re: Chitarrone
   Rebec and rebab spring to mind.............
   Lex
   Op 17 okt 2012, om 22:05 heeft Monica Hall het volgende geschreven:
   >  Such as ?  .............
   >
   >
   >
   >  Monica
   >
   >  ----- Original Message -----
   >
   >  From: [1]WALSH STUART
   >
   >  To: [2]Monica Hall
   >
   >  Cc: [3]Lutelist
   >
   >  Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 8:56 PM
   >
   >  Subject: Re: [LUTE] Re: Chitarrone
   >
   >    Other instruments than lutes have 'lute-shaped' bodies...
   >    Stuart
   >
   >  On 17 October 2012 20:29, Monica Hall <[4][1][email protected]>
   wrote:
   >
   >    Well - what is the difference between a lute and a
   gittern/mandore.
   >      When is a lute not a lute? Chitarrone as I understand it is a
   >    large member of the lute family i.e. it has a lute shaped body.
   It
   >    depends what you mean by separate traditions.......
   >    Monica...getting more confused by the minute.
   >
   >      Diego, unfortunately I cannot read Italian. Are you in agreement
   >    with
   >      Meucci?
   >      Monica, the only things I know about Meucci's article are from
   >    you. As
   >      I understand it, Meucci isn't saying that the chitarrone is a
   >    large
   >      lute. The lute has its own, separate,  traditions. The
   chitarrone
   >    (he
   >      is saying, I think) is a large (massive!) gittern (or
   >    gittern/mandore).
   >      Stuart
   >      On 17 October 2012 18:34, Diego Cantalupi
   <[1][5][2][email protected]>
   >    wrote:
   >        If you can read Italian, you can find my dissertation about
   >        Chitarrone here:
   >        [2][6][3]http://www.diegocantalupi.it/tesi.pdf
   >        The first chapter is about ethimology.
   >        Diego
   >>
   >      To get on or off this list see list information at
   >
   [3][7][4]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   >      --
   >    References
   >      1. mailto:[8][5][email protected]
   >      2. [9][6]http://www.diegocantalupi.it/tesi.pdf
   >      3. [10][7]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   >
   >  --
   >
   > References
   >
   >  1. mailto:[8][email protected]
   >  2. mailto:[9][email protected]
   >  3. mailto:[10][email protected]
   >  4. mailto:[11][email protected]
   >  5. mailto:[12][email protected]
   >  6. [13]http://www.diegocantalupi.it/tesi.pdf
   >  7. [14]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   >  8. mailto:[15][email protected]
   >  9. [16]http://www.diegocantalupi.it/tesi.pdf
   >  10. [17]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   >

   --

References

   1. mailto:[email protected]
   2. mailto:[email protected]
   3. http://www.diegocantalupi.it/tesi.pdf
   4. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   5. mailto:[email protected]
   6. http://www.diegocantalupi.it/tesi.pdf
   7. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   8. mailto:[email protected]
   9. mailto:[email protected]
  10. mailto:[email protected]
  11. mailto:[email protected]
  12. mailto:[email protected]
  13. http://www.diegocantalupi.it/tesi.pdf
  14. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
  15. mailto:[email protected]
  16. http://www.diegocantalupi.it/tesi.pdf
  17. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

Reply via email to