Not worth it.
Especially with such man-made objects.
RT
On 10/17/2012 4:40 PM, William Samson wrote:
I've been watching this discussion with interest and I wonder if it's
feasible to produce a taxonomy of plucked stringed instruments? In
particular, is it possible to construct a 'key' with questions
that distinguish one instrument from another, as botanists do with
different kinds of orchid, for example?
I simply throw this in as an idea - I'm NOT volunteering - I'm too old
to dodge the huge amounts of flak that would result.
Bill
From: Lex van Sante <[email protected]>
To: lute mailing list list <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, 17 October 2012, 21:17
Subject: [LUTE] Re: Chitarrone
Rebec and rebab spring to mind.............
Lex
Op 17 okt 2012, om 22:05 heeft Monica Hall het volgende geschreven:
> Such as ? .............
>
>
>
> Monica
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> From: [1]WALSH STUART
>
> To: [2]Monica Hall
>
> Cc: [3]Lutelist
>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 8:56 PM
>
> Subject: Re: [LUTE] Re: Chitarrone
>
> Other instruments than lutes have 'lute-shaped' bodies...
> Stuart
>
> On 17 October 2012 20:29, Monica Hall <[4][1][email protected]>
wrote:
>
> Well - what is the difference between a lute and a
gittern/mandore.
> When is a lute not a lute? Chitarrone as I understand it is a
> large member of the lute family i.e. it has a lute shaped body.
It
> depends what you mean by separate traditions.......
> Monica...getting more confused by the minute.
>
> Diego, unfortunately I cannot read Italian. Are you in agreement
> with
> Meucci?
> Monica, the only things I know about Meucci's article are from
> you. As
> I understand it, Meucci isn't saying that the chitarrone is a
> large
> lute. The lute has its own, separate, traditions. The
chitarrone
> (he
> is saying, I think) is a large (massive!) gittern (or
> gittern/mandore).
> Stuart
> On 17 October 2012 18:34, Diego Cantalupi
<[1][5][2][email protected]>
> wrote:
> If you can read Italian, you can find my dissertation about
> Chitarrone here:
> [2][6][3]http://www.diegocantalupi.it/tesi.pdf
> The first chapter is about ethimology.
> Diego
>>
> To get on or off this list see list information at
>
[3][7][4]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
> --
> References
> 1. mailto:[8][5][email protected]
> 2. [9][6]http://www.diegocantalupi.it/tesi.pdf
> 3. [10][7]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
>
> --
>
> References
>
> 1. mailto:[8][email protected]
> 2. mailto:[9][email protected]
> 3. mailto:[10][email protected]
> 4. mailto:[11][email protected]
> 5. mailto:[12][email protected]
> 6. [13]http://www.diegocantalupi.it/tesi.pdf
> 7. [14]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
> 8. mailto:[15][email protected]
> 9. [16]http://www.diegocantalupi.it/tesi.pdf
> 10. [17]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
>
--
References
1. mailto:[email protected]
2. mailto:[email protected]
3. http://www.diegocantalupi.it/tesi.pdf
4. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
5. mailto:[email protected]
6. http://www.diegocantalupi.it/tesi.pdf
7. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
8. mailto:[email protected]
9. mailto:[email protected]
10. mailto:[email protected]
11. mailto:[email protected]
12. mailto:[email protected]
13. http://www.diegocantalupi.it/tesi.pdf
14. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
15. mailto:[email protected]
16. http://www.diegocantalupi.it/tesi.pdf
17. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
