Is someone issuing a collection of Bach's works properly improved and
   corrected?
   (In fact, is David's email a mischievous allusion to something going on
   in the world of musicology?)
   Stuart

   On 15 November 2012 21:27, Arto Wikla <[1][email protected]> wrote:

     Well, you know the holy Dowland - as the holy Bach ... ;-)
     Arto

   On 15/11/12 23:12, WALSH STUART wrote:

         Well, isn't anyone other than Dan going to reply to this? I was
         expecting a huge response!
         Stuart
         On 13 November 2012 20:33, David Tayler
     <[1][2][email protected]>
         wrote:
               Most of Dowland's lute solos come down to use a
     sketch--two
           outside
              lines, a few chords, and some "noodly
     appendages"--ornaments
           added by
              lutebook owners or their copyists.
              Many conclusions can be drawn, but the basic question
     remains,
           what to
              do with all of these sources? Obviously, performing them
     "as is"
           is one
              solution, and perfectly fine--a snapshot in time of what a
     lute
           player
              of the time would have played. Absoutely OK, and there it
     is, in
           the
              ms. But suppose there is more?
              The other path is to add inner voices and strip out the
     noodly
              appendages. I've given this quite a bit of thought over the
     last
              twenty-five years, and I have a few simple guidelines.
              1. Eliminate parallel fifths and octaves. Dowland never
     wrote bad
              counterpoint, so these have to go. Famous example is the
     version
           of
              Lachrimae with the parallel fifth in the opening phrase,
     even
           though
              Dowland's published version is different.
              2. Strip out "orbiting" noodly appendages. One sure sign of
           cookbook,
              color-by-number ornaments are those that present a set of
     added
           melodic
              sequences that start and end on the same note. Accomplished
           composers
              rarely use these, they are intended mainly for students. By
           returning
              to the same note, you mostly avoid the problem of parallel
           octaves and
              fifths, thus, an amateur who could not read music and did
     not
           study
              counterpoint could provide "correct" counterpoint in simple
           ornaments.
              Ornamentation treatises mention this trick as a way to dive
     in to
              ornamentation: nothing wrong with it, but it is for
           beginners--not
              Dowland.
              3. Make sure cadences have leading tones somewhere in the
     bar,
           and end
              chords with thirds in the harmony. Although you see open
     fifths
           in mid
              century lute works, by 1590 you mainly see full harmony. A
           skilled
              player would not play G Major with a third and C "Major"
     without
           the
              third just to avoid fifth position, and you see this in the
     ms
           sources.
              Whether these open chords were simply sketches, or
     intentionally
           left
              to the play to fill in, foreshadowing later works such as
     Visee,
           these
              need leading tones.
              4. Inner parts. Dowland's works at an absolute minimum
     always
           support a
              tenor or alto part, or both. If they are missing, they need
     to be
              supplied. There are a myriad of examples in the lute solos
     and
           lute
              songs, and they follow simple rules of counterpoint. If you
     study
           the
              chromatic fantasies, you can see complex inversions and
           imitation, but
              ta simple, well-written line will do. After analyzing all
     of the
           works,
              I can see that they were composed with inner parts in
     mind--that
           is,
              there are no works that paint contrapuntal corners where
     inner
           parts
              are not possible, which you see in other composers.
              Following these rules, I have created a very simple
     example. In
           one
              place I changed the harmony to make sure the form was
     "rounded,"
           that
              is, a sort of mini refrain but the rest is pretty
           straightforward.
              [2][3]http://youtu.be/Pr7jtlXk-OU?hd=1
              I'm interested in new ideas going forward, before I tackle
     some
           of the
              more complex works. Please feel free to make suggestions.
              dt
              --
           To get on or off this list see list information at
           [3][4]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
         --
     References
         1. mailto:[5][email protected]
         2. [6]http://youtu.be/Pr7jtlXk-OU?hd=1
         3. [7]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --

References

   1. mailto:[email protected]
   2. mailto:[email protected]
   3. http://youtu.be/Pr7jtlXk-OU?hd=1
   4. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   5. mailto:[email protected]
   6. http://youtu.be/Pr7jtlXk-OU?hd=1
   7. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

Reply via email to