Stephen,
      Thank you for responding to my imbedded comment. In citing the
   bourree from BWV 996, I believe you may have inadvertently chosen the
   perfect example to illustrate the ambiguity surrounding arbitrary
   performance standards.
      Consider the proper tempo for the piece. Even the pros do not play
   it at true bourree tempo or feel. If at the proper speed, the
   difficulty drastically increases placing it on a difficulty level
   comparable to the other movements of the suite. I wonder then how the
   appropriate grade difficulty level is assessed. Do exam graders
   evaluate students on their demonstrated applied knowledge of the tempi
   and metric pulse patterns of baroque dance forms? Are they graded
   according to the tempo tradition dictated by modern performers which
   was arrived at arbitrarily? (This particular piece should have a fairly
   quick 2/2 feel rather than the plodding 4/4 pulse which is has become
   the norm solely through repetition; another example of, "My teacher
   plays it that way. John Williams and Julian Bream recorded it that way.
   I've heard it like that so often that anything else doesn't sound right
   to me.") Are the exam graders even expected to be familiar or concerned
   with these types of performance practice issues?
   Chris
   Dr. Christopher Wilke D.M.A.
   Lutenist, Guitarist and Composer
   www.christopherwilke.com
   ----- Original Message -----
   From: Stephen Kenyon <[email protected]>
   To: Christopher Wilke <[email protected]>
   Cc: Dan Winheld <[email protected]>; Mark Seifert <[email protected]>;
   gary <[email protected]>; lutelist <[email protected]>
   Sent: Sunday, August 4, 2013 10:34 AM
   Subject: [LUTE] Re: general public Lute awareness
   Assignment to grades is certainly arbitrary and all the more so when
   the reviewer is not actually responsible for setting syllabus
   standards, so they should be saying "is roughly a grade 6 piece".
   About half the readership of the UK based Classical Guitar magazine
   is UK resident, and most will have some idea of grades so its helpful
   to them to know roughly where a piece sits in grade terms.
   For many years "the" Bach Bourree (Em) was a grade 6 piece, now
   considered a bit too hard for 6.
   I think so long as folks don't forget that grading is arbitrary and
   only an outline or framework, it can be helpful, not least to avoid
   disruptive leaps in standard when setting pieces for students.
   Stephen
   On 4 Aug 2013, at 15:09, Christopher Wilke wrote:
   > .....
   >    [On a side note, I've been amused to follow the side topic that
   > this
   >    thread has spawned regarding the qualifications for grade
   > examiners in
   >    the UK. A couple of my compositions have been reviewed in British
   >    publications. They always say something like, "this is a Grade 6
   >    piece". As an American, I wonder what the heck that even means.
   > Despite
   >    the thoroughness of the system, what I've learned has done
   > nothing to
   >    dissuade me from believing that performance study is essentially
   >    arbitrary.]
   >
   --
   To get on or off this list see list information at
   [1]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --

References

   1. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

Reply via email to