No disrespect meant at all to David Tayler. That was squarely delivered to the 
people making those comments about whichever videos he was talking about. The 
original quote:

>>>  Other Early Music musicians make constant and disparaging jokes about
>>>   the quality of the lute YouTube videos. They circulate them in groups
>>>   as joke emails, especially where two continuo players are playing the
>>>   same piece but playing different chords. Like major and minor at the
>>>   same time. It is one of the most common comments I hear in the pub
>>>   after an orchestra rehearsal. "Did you see this. OMG how could they not
>>>   know?" What they are saying is not only did they play the mistake, but
>>>   they are unaware that a mistake has been played. Of course, these same
>>>   commentators are not making their own solo videos, but still, it is a
>>>   litany.


On Aug 9, 2013, at 7:08 PM, Dan Winheld <[email protected]> wrote:

> "Being able to play figures off a baritone clef and transpose down a third 
> while doing so has nothing to do with playing musically, collaboratively and 
> with appropriate ornaments and affect."
> 
> Yes it does. If you are stopped cold in your tracks by an unfamiliar clef, 
> that will end the collaboration instantly. Not too much will happen in the 
> way of ornamentation either. Of course, it has been said that what occurs 
> between the notes, and the silences in music, also can have the greatest 
> meaning- so I will give "affect" a pass.
> 
> "What deep brand of stupid does it take to make a comment like "they
>     played the wrong chord and didn't even know"?"
> 
> Is this disrespect necessary? Dr. Tayler has been in the music business for a 
> lifetime- we have no knowledge of every single incident that transpired in 
> all of his engagements over a long & busy professional career. I've 
> seen/heard some pretty cringeworthy Early Music performances myself, but more 
> in the earlier days of the Early Music revival. There have been a number of 
> somewhat different "Bubbles" that we have all lived in; both in time, place, 
> and circumstances. I have a couple hair of raising stories myself- playing 
> the lute outside for some homeless people in the S.F. Fillmore district, gigs 
> in honky-tonk rural bars, and one in a maximum security ward of a psychiatric 
> institution in Manhattan. Wrong chords in bad places are really not an 
> impossibility.
> 
> Dan
> 
> On 8/9/2013 2:35 PM, Daniel Shoskes wrote:
>> I don't know who is living in the bigger bubble. I know lots of Early Music 
>> performers from diverse countries and backgrounds not to mention all the 
>> exposure from being on the Board of Directors of 3 music organizations (EMA, 
>> Apollo's Fire, LSA). I have never heard the laughably ridiculous 
>> characterizations you quote. I guess those lute players really are bottom of 
>> the barrel, directing BEMF, Tempesta di Mari and such. Really should replace 
>> O'Dette and Stubbs in Boston with a couple of cornetto players, that will 
>> finally raise the bar.
>> 
>> This "no short cuts" business reminds me of what my Medical School anatomy 
>> professor told us about the good ol days. When he was a student, your 
>> anatomy exam included sticking your hand in a closed bag containing several 
>> small bones of the foot which you had to identify by feel. Fundamental 
>> skill? You could identify those bones by smell and still be unable to cut 
>> your way out of a paper bag in the operating room. It also reminds me of the 
>> life story of the great German baritone Thomas Quasthoff who was denied 
>> entrance to his local conservatory because all singers had to be able to 
>> play the piano.
>> 
>> What deep brand of stupid does it take to make a comment like "they played 
>> the wrong chord and didn't even know"? I guess in their conservatory, they 
>> were taught to telegraph facially to the audience whenever they played 
>> parallel fifths or a wrong figure because of course that's the only way 
>> anyone in the audience would know.
>> 
>> Being able to play figures off a baritone clef and transpose down a third 
>> while doing so has nothing to do with playing musically, collaboratively and 
>> with appropriate ornaments and affect. The stultifying performances of many 
>> a conservatory graduate can attest to that. I suggest a good reason for 
>> smart talented lute players NOT to have the same skill sets of these "top 
>> musicians" is that in fact they are smart and talented and have more 
>> fruitful things to do with their time (like tune and change frets).
>> 
>> 
>> Danny
>> 
>> 
>> On Aug 8, 2013, at 7:57 PM, David Tayler <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>>   I think this is an interesting question, and I will risk posting an
>>>   honest answer. The answer depends on who is "The General Public". I
>>>   divide the groups as: the 200 countries of YouTube distribution,
>>>   Academics, other lute players, people in the Early Music scene, and
>>>   modern musicians, as these are the groups frequently mentioned here.
>>>   First off, however, I must note that at a good conservatory or college
>>>   offering a real music major, you are expected to play the piano, read
>>>   figured bass and pass a score reading exam using multiple staves of an
>>>   orchestra work and transposing clefs.
>>>   I mention this because of the puzzling stories about people who can
>>>   play the keyboard and transpose and so on. That is an entry level
>>>   skill, and a requirement. I had to take two years of piano to pass the
>>>   exam, along with all the other students, and that was to get just a
>>>   basic BA in music. Hours of piano lab, hours of practice, and everyone
>>>   had to do it, no exceptions. I had to take an even harder exam to be
>>>   admitted for the MA, which included a test in Fugue writing and
>>>   counterpoint. Basic training, basic training for just the BA. However,
>>>   in many European systems, the requirements are more strict.
>>>   So although I think it is cool that there are these stories, I think
>>>   the very fact that we tell these stories sends the message to the
>>>   General Public that, unfortunately, we didn't finish basic training.
>>>   And what kind of a message is that? Most professional musicians on the
>>>   violin, cello, piano, harpsichord, and so on, had to work to get these
>>>   skills just to get into the Conservatory. They expect everyone to do
>>>   these things fluently. This explains some of the "attitude" from modern
>>>   players. Rightly or wrongly, they look at the basic training. And they
>>>   had teachers who said, in a unified voice "no shortcuts."
>>>   And that in no way means that the people in the lute stories are not
>>>   good musicians, because they often are, but think for a moment if you
>>>   played in any original, historical French baroque opera what you would
>>>   have to do. You would have to read multiple clefs, including double
>>>   figured (figures on both sides of the staff) baritone clef with the F
>>>   on the middle line, and short score the other parts, none of which line
>>>   up with anything familiar.
>>>   Way harder than playing the piano. Most harpsichordists and organists
>>>   who play opera can do this, most lute players cannot do this. Yes, it
>>>   is harder on the lute. But the musical skills are the same and no
>>>   harder.
>>>   As far as the General Population of the Planet, the vast majority have
>>>   no idea what a lute is, and lute players would be regarded as an
>>>   historical oddity from movies and TV shows, e.g., cameo appearances of
>>>   "Game of Thrones" or "House."  Followers of Sting would have a very
>>>   hazy idea that it is the funny looking instrument from Sting's foray
>>>   into Early Music, but not much more. Certainly the YouTube boom has
>>>   marginally improved awareness, however, most of the YouTube videos are
>>>   not intended to be recordings in the sense of a produced recording.
>>>   There's no one playing the lute on YouTube who can even remotely
>>>   approach the chops of say for example the 14 year old girl who plays
>>>   the Vivaldi Four Seasons on the guitar. The GPOTP may not know much,
>>>   but they know raw talent.
>>>   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DIGfO2Dgc9Y
>>>   As far as other lute players, lute players are highly regarded. This
>>>   means we live in a bubble.
>>>   As far as other Early Music musicians, sadly, but undeniably, lute
>>>   players are regarded as the worst musicians. Bottom of the Barrel. That
>>>   is, there is no other instrument that has a lower reputation, with the
>>>   possible exception of the Krummhorn. The reason for this is
>>>   complicated, but basically has to do with anecdotal stories that
>>>   circulate about lute players in ensembles, basic sight reading, rhythm,
>>>   score reading, ensemble skills and so on. The situation has changed
>>>   slightly in the last few years, as more continuo players enter the
>>>   pool. However, recorder players, cornetto, harpsichord, organ, oboe and
>>>   viol players nowadays have advanced training, especially in notation
>>>   and ornamentation, but also in ensemble playing and rhythmic training,
>>>   that lute players just don't have. Their bar is higher.
>>>   Other Early Music musicians make constant and disparaging jokes about
>>>   the quality of the lute YouTube videos. They circulate them in groups
>>>   as joke emails, especially where two continuo players are playing the
>>>   same piece but playing different chords. Like major and minor at the
>>>   same time. It is one of the most common comments I hear in the pub
>>>   after an orchestra rehearsal. "Did you see this. OMG how could they not
>>>   know?" What they are saying is not only did they play the mistake, but
>>>   they are unaware that a mistake has been played. Of course, these same
>>>   commentators are not making their own solo videos, but still, it is a
>>>   litany.
>>>   I think the videos are a great thing, and of course many of them are
>>>   meant to be sharing, rather than comparing, but there is a PR downside.
>>>   As far as modern players, when I play with a modern orchestra like the,
>>>   the reception is normally warm and inviting. I don't get the reaction I
>>>   got thirty years ago. Orchestra players often have worked with
>>>   crossover conductors who are active in both worlds.
>>>   As far as academia, most people in a university environment will have
>>>   some idea of what a lute is, but not much more than "Game of Thrones".
>>>   Lute players are smart, talented people. There's no reason that they
>>>   can't have the same skill sets as the top musicians in the world, just
>>>   as they did in the renaissance.
>>>   dt
>>> 
>>>   --
>>> 
>>> 
>>> To get on or off this list see list information at
>>> http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 



Reply via email to