indeed thank you so much for this intersting work. All the best
--------------------------------------------
En date de : Mar 15.4.14, Anthony Hart <[email protected]> a écrit :

 Objet: [LUTE] Re: Lute sonatas of Antonino Reggio
 À: "Martyn Hodgson" <[email protected]>
 Cc: "Stephan Olbertz" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" 
<[email protected]>
 Date: Mardi 15 avril 2014, 4h51
 
    Thanks for the
 interest and discussion.
    Let me clarify some points:
    I took into account all earlier
 discussions and considered each one
    carefully. I apologise for not
 acknowledging each of you, but thanks
    for the comments.
    1) A  A I had considered a tabulature
 edition but, as it has been
    pointed out we are not sure what
 instrument they were intended for.
    Reggio just calls them "Sonatine a Liuto e
 Basso". There is nowhere
    (that I have so far discovered) any
 reference to these works other than
    the titles on the manuscript. The ms
 itself is Reggio's own draft
    written copies, this is clear from the
 crossings out and amendments on
    some of the pages and there is no "fair"
 copy.A
    So, because of this fact, I decided to
 reproduce Reggio's work as he
    wrote it (without the crossings out!).
 This would allow the performer
    to make is own assessment of the pieces.
 Also, hopefully to stimulate
    further discussion so that it might be
 possible to assess A the pieces
    more objectively.
    2) A  I also considered a facsimile
 edition but the copies available
    are very poor and it would not have been a
 successful undertaking. The
    library where the manuscripts are
 maintained do not have facilities for
    digitizing so therefore the copies are on
 microfische, also my copy is
    a copy of a copy of a copy...... I have
 invested in a good film scanner
    and have managed to produce a working copy
 to be able to copy, with
    great effort and strained eyes, them into
 a form that can be read.A
    My own humble ideas are that they written
 in the treble clef but
    sounding an octave lower. (the 8 is
 missing from the clef as these are
    sketches and Reggio has not indicated
 thus!). As he call the insrtument
    "Liuto" one can guesas that he might have
 meant the liuto attiobato,
    possible in G.
    We must also remember that Reggio was
 fundamentally a keyboard player
    and cellist. The lute sonatas are only 24
 works in his corpus of 158
    works. He possibly had a friend or
 colleague who played the lute and
    wrote them for him (her) with himself
 accompanying on the cello. Also,
    the question is: Where these actually
 played or just an excercise?A
    I hope that has answered some of your
 questions. I would welcome any
    feed back from you so, maybe, we can come
 to some better conclusions.
    After some 15 years searching for clues
 about Reggio and his works I
    feel I have exhausted the sources, however
 some small snippets have
    recently come to light, so maybe we might
 learn a bit more about these
    works.A
    As someone suggested some years ago that
 my work was a "labour of
    love", actually it became an obsession and
 a frustration that I have
    not been able to discover more. I hope
 that my work is appreciated
    I have kept the prices to a minimum
 considering the hours spent in
    transcribilng these works ( and the other
 134 works!). An artist friend
    of mine has produced a beautiful
 illustration for the cover and I hope
    some will purchase the printed version
 (Hint!). I am not looking for
    profit I just want the works to be known,
 played and appreciated.
    Thank you all for your interest over the
 years since I announced this
    find and I hope that Antonino Reggio
 becomes part of the lute
    repertoire in years to come.A
    Just to remind you you can find these
 works on
    [1]www.edizionear.com/lute.html (A not too
 subtle advert!!) and please
    I would welcome any comments and feedback
 on my work.
    Best wishes to allA
    Anthony
 
    On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Martyn
 Hodgson
    <[2][email protected]>
 wrote:
 
      A  A There's already been
 discussion with Anthony about the likely
      A  A instrument. I doubt a
 mandora since it was hardly, if at all,
      known in
      A  A Italy at this time.
 However I agree with you about the use of
      sharp
      A  A keys in this source and I
 suggested an instrument in the old
      tuning but
      A  A with the highest A course
 at a nominal a'.
      A  A I understand he was
 intending to transcribe the music into
      tablature
      A  A but have no idea of what
 he has actually done, A though I
      presume he
      A  A would not use the DM lute
 tuning.....
      A  A MH
 
    A  A
    A
 __________________________________________________________________
    A  A From: Stephan Olbertz <[3][email protected]>
 
      A  A To: "[4][email protected]"
 <[5][email protected]>
      A  A Sent: Monday, 14 April
 2014, 8:35
 
    A  A Subject: [LUTE] Re: Lute sonatas
 of Antonino Reggio
 
    A  A Ralf,
    A  A judged by the score of vol 1,
 the music would go up to the 17th
    fret on
    A  A an instrument in A. Examples of
 lute music in octave transposing
    clefs
    A  A are too many to cite here. I too
 thought of mandolin music, but
    the
    A  A tuning wouldn't seem to fit. As
 becomes clear from many chords of
    up to
    A  A five notes, the best tuning
 would be a mandora in E, especially
    since
    A  A sonata IV requires a third and
 sixth course "in effetto maggiore",
    A  A which means F sharp, judged by
 the music. A lute tuning in E would
    A  A already have that F sharp.
    A  A Maybe Anthony has a discussion
 of the possible instrumentation
    A  A somewhere?
    A  A >> as the lute sound was
 understood mainly as a 16'-register in
    the
    A  A >> 18th century, it is
 maybe not that much of a problem.
    A  A >
    A  A > Which 18th century source
 does state this explicitly?
    A  A None. That's my conclusion based
 on the surviving evidence.
    A  A Regards
    A  A Stephan
 
      A  A Am 13.04.2014, 23:09 Uhr,
 schrieb R. Mattes
      <[1][6][email protected]>:
 
    A  A > On Sun, 13 Apr 2014
 22:16:16 +0200, Stephan Olbertz wrote
    A  A >> Dear Christopher,
    A  A >>
    A  A >> I was a bit hasty, I'm
 afraid, and didn't look closely enough
    to
    A  A >> Anthony's sample,
 assuming it was all simple octaving basses. I
    A  A >> purchased a pdf and
 found several instances where indeed the
    lute
    A  A >> bass has a different,
 lower note than the violoncello.
    A  A >
    A  A > Only commenting the sample
 page: nowhere does the "liuto"-Bass
    play
    A  A > below the notated bass
 voice. Unless you follow the theory that
    the
    A  A > "liuto" voice is notated an
 ovtave higher than intended. But why
    A  A would
    A  A > one notate in the highest
 available key while much better
    fitting
    A  A clefs
    A  A > where widely in use (the
 combination F bass clef and C soprano
    clef,
    A  A > pretty much the standard
 combination for keyboard music for
    quite
    A  A some
    A  A > time in the 18th century,
 works extremly well for lute music).
    A  A > And let's not forget the
 possibility of an archiliuto tuned in
    A.
    A  A That
 
      A  A > would put the
 highest note of the minue on the 11th fret. Not
      too
 
    A  A > different from the demands
 of late german lute music.
    A  A > My first impression was
 actually: this looks and sound like
    music for
    A  A > mandolin or some similar
 (plectrum played) instrument ...
    A  A >
    A  A >
    A  A >> Now, as
    A  A >> Daniel remarked, this
 actually seems strange. But on the other
    hand,
    A  A >> as the lute sound was
 understood mainly as a 16'-register in
    the
    A  A >> 18th century, it is
 maybe not that much of a problem.
    A  A >
    A  A > Which 18th century source
 does state this explicitly?
    A  A >
    A  A > A Cheers, Ralf Mattes
    A  A >
    A  A >
    A  A --
 
      A  A Viele Gruesse
 
    A  A Best regards
    A  A Stephan Olbertz
    A  A To get on or off this list see
 list information at
 
      A  A [2][7]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
      A  A --
      References
      A  A 1. mailto:[8][email protected]
      A  A 2. [9]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
 
    --
 
 References
 
    1. http://www.edizionear.com/lute.html
    2. mailto:[email protected]
    3. mailto:[email protected]
    4. mailto:[email protected]
    5. mailto:[email protected]
    6. mailto:[email protected]
    7. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
    8. mailto:[email protected]
    9. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
 
 



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

Reply via email to