So what do I know? the top of the bass extension appears to have at
   least two pegs mounted perpendicular to the others, coming out of or
   going behind the plane of the neck. If there are three arranged that
   way, it would account for all 9 string.
   To me, it looks like two strings on the lute are broken, and someone,
   the Lady, perhaps, has gathered the loose lengths up and tucked them
   under the string plane to keep them out of the way.
   Many portraits of this era made use of allegory: perhaps the artist was
   aware of, and painted into the picture, his assessment of the couple's
   relationship, the lady's pre-occupied look to the heavens and her
   instrument's broken strings being connected and a statement upon either
   her fidelity or comfort with her portrait-sharing partner?
   If I were asked to sit for a portrait with such an instrument, and
   told, by the artist, to sit on the right side of the other person, I
   would, politely and inappropriately-for-playing, rotate the lute in my
   lap to stick the neck off to the left. So I don't take any hints of
   handedness of the picture from that. The broken strings, the
   inattention or even ennui on her face, and the dog add up to unmusical
   indications of the Lady's status in the eyes of the painter, though.
   ray

   On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 8:53 AM, Martyn Hodgson
   <[1][email protected]> wrote:

        Dear Gary,
        I do agree: this is why I suggested that 'In short, the very act
     of
        posing for the picture was
         the statement rather than the playing of music'.
        regards,
        Martyn

     __________________________________________________________________
        From: Gary Boye <[2][email protected]>
        To: Martyn Hodgson <[3][email protected]>
        Cc: David Van Edwards <[4][email protected]>;
     "[5][email protected]"
        <[6][email protected]>
        Sent: Tuesday, 24 November 2015, 13:19
        Subject: Re: [LUTE] Re: Another lute picture?

      Martyn,
      There seems to be an inside joke we're not privy to here. It may
   just
      be that the artist liked the 90 degree angle created by the 2
      instruments when held this way. And/or if she held it in the normal
      position she would have risked obscuring the man's face and throwing
      off the composition.But look at the dog: he/she doesn't seem to be
      enjoying the lute playing and the reaction is aimed pointedly at the
      lute player. Something important is happening there.
      This borders on parody, seen apparently from the point of view of
   the
      male gamba player, who looks directly at us. Subtle; but barely . .
   .
      It seems to me to be a joke on the woman, whether or not she was
   "in"
      on it.
      Gary
      On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 6:14 AM, Martyn Hodgson
      <[1][7][email protected]> wrote:
           Very interesting David.
           It may be simply a fashionable couple wanting to be portrayed
           performing but in fact unable to play a note! Perhaps the
   painter
        who,
           as you point out, might be thought to have known better was
        laughing up
           his sleeve...
           Or perhaps, and maybe more likely (the painter might not have
        wished to
           be later seen to make fools of his rich clients), they had
        insisted on
           this sort of pose (it certainly looks very stylised especially
        with the
           young lady's eyes turned to heaven etc) and their insistence
        overcame
           any scruples the painter may have expressed about depicting
   them
           actually playing. In short, the very act of posing for the
        picture was
           the statement rather than the playing of music.
           regards
           Martyn
        __________________________________________________________________
           From: David Van Edwards <[2][8][email protected]>
           To: [3][9][email protected]
           Sent: Tuesday, 24 November 2015, 10:50
           Subject: [LUTE] Another lute picture?
             Dear All,
             My Lute of the Month series has dwindled to lute of the Year
        these
             days! It's because I've mainly been writng them for the Lute
           Society's
             newsletter, Lute News, now it has a nice full colour cover.
             But here is the latest, as it were more public, example up on
        the web
             at

   [1][4][10]http://www.vanedwards.co.uk/month/Nov%2015/month.htm
             I hope you find it fun! As usual please email me any
        corrections or
             comments
             Best wishes,
             David
           --
             The Smokehouse,
             6 Whitwell Road,
             Norwich,   NR1 4HB
             England.
             Telephone: [5][11]+ 44 (0)1603 629899
             Website: [2][6][12]http://www.vanedwards.co.uk
             --
           To get on or off this list see list information at

   [3][7][13]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
           --
        References
           1. [8][14]http://www.vanedwards.co.uk/month/Nov%2015/month.htm
           2. [9][15]http://www.vanedwards.co.uk/
           3.
   [10][16]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
      --
      Gary R. Boye, M.S.L.S., Ph.D.
      Erneston Music Library
      Appalachian State University
      --
   References
      1. mailto:[17][email protected]
      2. mailto:[18][email protected]
      3. mailto:[19][email protected]
      4. [20]http://www.vanedwards.co.uk/month/Nov%2015/month.htm

        5. file://localhost/net/people/lute-arc/L2144-3612TMP.html

      6. [21]http://www.vanedwards.co.uk/
      7. [22]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
      8. [23]http://www.vanedwards.co.uk/month/Nov%2015/month.htm
      9. [24]http://www.vanedwards.co.uk/
     10. [25]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --

References

   1. mailto:[email protected]
   2. mailto:[email protected]
   3. mailto:[email protected]
   4. mailto:[email protected]
   5. mailto:[email protected]
   6. mailto:[email protected]
   7. mailto:[email protected]
   8. mailto:[email protected]
   9. mailto:[email protected]
  10. http://www.vanedwards.co.uk/month/Nov%2015/month.htm
  11. tel:%2B%2044%20%280%291603%20629899
  12. http://www.vanedwards.co.uk/
  13. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
  14. http://www.vanedwards.co.uk/month/Nov%2015/month.htm
  15. http://www.vanedwards.co.uk/
  16. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
  17. mailto:[email protected]
  18. mailto:[email protected]
  19. mailto:[email protected]
  20. http://www.vanedwards.co.uk/month/Nov%2015/month.htm
  21. http://www.vanedwards.co.uk/
  22. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
  23. http://www.vanedwards.co.uk/month/Nov%2015/month.htm
  24. http://www.vanedwards.co.uk/
  25. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

Reply via email to