Dear Herbert,
I have completed the piece now (hopefully without too much mistakes):

The voices had to be transposed one quint lower to fit the lute.
The music fits perfectly (with some diminutions, passing notes and slight variations etc. - in the Vihuela part the low a is flat in opposite to the voices) - In measure 8 I had to prolongen the first 2 notes in the Vihuela part to fit to the chant. The last measures of the Vihuela are a repetition only.

https://musescore.com/user/4275446/scores/1918286


Best regards
Markus

Am 26.03.2016 um 04:17 schrieb Herbert Ward:

Besides different rhythmic organization and key, there are also some inserted
notes.  For example, the first interval in the tablature is a major second, and
that in the vocal score is a minor third.

I would never have found the score without help.  Thanks.



On Thu, 24 Mar 2016, AJN wrote:


Here is the page in Valdrrabano:

http://bdh-rd.bne.es/viewer.vm?pid=d-3510057

And the score (in G tuning a fifth higher than the tablature):

http://www1.cpdl.org/wiki/images/3/39/Des_Prez-Per_illud_ave.pdf




On 03/24/16, Ron Andrico<[email protected]> wrote:
I think it is in fact the same music, just in a different "key" and with 
different rhythmic organization, particularly at the opening. What you are
seeing in the tablature is a version adapted for plucked strings with idiomatic 
changes in rhythm, a very common characteristic of intabulated
vocal music. It's actually very interesting to see the way intabulators 
modified the music, for instance in Fuenllana's many duos for which we can
find vocal scores. I think Fuenllana's adaptation of the Benedictus duo from 
Josquin's Missa Pange lingua is much better music than Josquin's
original.

Herbert, I imagine your questions arise in attempting to sort out the several 
points of dissonance in Valderrabano's tablature. The best thing you
can do to gain an understanding of the piece is transcribe the tablature into 
notation on two staves.

RA

________________________________________
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Herbert Ward 
<[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2016 8:29 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [LUTE] Per illud ave does not match.

I appreciate the recent help with "Per illud ave".

But the piece suggested by the people here in this
forum does not match the piece in Damiani's book.

Here is an illustration showing everything:
https://classwk.pw/Jos_Da_2016_11.gif

What would be the next step in searching for
the vocal score?

-- Herbert



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html




--



--

Markus Lutz
Schulstraße 11

88422 Bad Buchau

Tel  0 75 82 / 92 62 89
Fax  0 75 82 / 92 62 90
Mail [email protected]


Reply via email to