But the psalm settings are beautiful! I play a lot of Vallet in my
   concerts, and the preludes and psalms from the Regia Pietas are among
   my - and I hope my audience's - favorites.
   David
   On Sat, 13 Jan 2018 at 18:34, Rainer <[1][email protected]>
   wrote:

     Why do you "reply to all"?
     On 13.01.2018 17:41, Ron Andrico wrote:
     >      Rainer, if your object is to create a complete edition of
     Vallet's lute
     >      works, of course you should include the quartets.   I hope
     you're also
     >      including all the psalm settings with variations from Regia
     Pietas as
     >      well.
     no, I won't. I am not interested in psalm settings and I don't think
     anybody wants to see an edition with 700 pages.
     Anyway, that would take two more years.
     I am too sick for such a task.
     >
     >      As I recall there aren't that many misprints in Vallet's
     quartets, and
     >      passing dissonance in music for plucked strings was not
     written to be
     >      judged by a standard created by 20th- and 21st-century
     musicologists.
     Well, have a look at duets from English sources. You won't find such
     errors in English duets - apart from false relations between a
     ground an a trebele.
     The duets by Robinson are a bit too polished, though :)
     >      This is what I posted ten days ago:
     >
     >      Dissonance in 16th- and 17th-century improvisational ensemble
     music was
     >      the norm rather than the exception.   This statement can be
     verified
     >      simply by reading historical ensemble music with parts
     intabulated for
     >      lutes. For instance, one's first reaction in reading through
     Besard's
     >      lute duets (1603) and ensemble music (1617) is that he was a
     complete
     >      hack and didn't know the first thing about composing.   But
     the same
     >      bountiful cross-relations and clashes can be found in duets
     published
     >      by Phalese (1552) all the way up to the quartets published by
     Vallet
     >      (1616).   Sure, there were misprints and mistakes, but
     passing
     >      dissonances were acceptable.
     Somebody said that the trios by Pacoloni were composed part by part
     ignoring the other parts.
     I believe the main problem with Vallet's quartets simply is that it
     is certainly very difficult to compose such music for 4 different
     lutes.
     Rainer
     To get on or off this list see list information at
     [2]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --

   *******************************
   David van Ooijen
   [3][email protected]
   [4]www.davidvanooijen.nl
   *******************************

   --

References

   1. mailto:[email protected]
   2. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   3. mailto:[email protected]
   4. http://www.davidvanooijen.nl/

Reply via email to