> > > > *FTTP* is the only economic solution, even if it did cost triple what > it was > > projected > > Why? FTTN is thought to be cheaper. You have to bend definitions quite a > bit to end up with a system where price is not a part of economics. > Personal note: I'm okay with copper gigabit to endpoint at work, same at > home. >
Has the 'node' been properly defined here? Will there be a node per street? Per block? Per exchange? James _______________________________________________ luv-main mailing list [email protected] http://lists.luv.asn.au/listinfo/luv-main
