On Wed, 11 Sep 2013 09:24:36 AM Jobst Schmalenbach wrote:
> > > *FTTP* is the only economic solution, even if it did cost triple what > > > projected > > > > Why? FTTN is thought to be cheaper. You have to bend definitions quite a > > bit to end up with a system where price is not a part of economics. > > Personal note: I'm okay with copper gigabit to endpoint at work, same at > > home. If NBN will cost 44 billion and there will be some 11 million taxpayers [1] to pay for it each will have to provide $4,000. It does not look cheap to me - and no state funded enterprise ever ended without costing significantly more. [1] http://www.taxreview.treasury.gov.au/content/Paper.aspx?doc=html/publications/papers/report/section_2-03.htm Petr Baum -- <[email protected]> Petr Baum, P.O.Box 2364, Rowville 3178 fax +61-3-97643342 This message was created in naturally virus-free operating system: Linux _______________________________________________ luv-main mailing list [email protected] http://lists.luv.asn.au/listinfo/luv-main
