On 09/11/2013 09:24 AM, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote: > What planet are you living on? > > I look after a bunch of ADSL/SHDSL connections at different > premises/exchanges - when they fail they fail (90%) on the LAST 300m - which > is what the FTTN will use. **WE** will pay for the FTTN, it is shortsided. > > Jobst > > > > On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 08:52:16PM +1000, Pidgorny, Slav (GEUS) > ([email protected]) wrote: >> G'day - >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] >>> On Behalf Of Andrew McGlashan >>> >>> *FTTP* is the only economic solution, even if it did cost triple what >> it was >>> projected >> Why? FTTN is thought to be cheaper. You have to bend definitions quite a >> bit to end up with a system where price is not a part of economics. >> Personal note: I'm okay with copper gigabit to endpoint at work, same at >> home. >> >> Regards >> >> Slav FTTN is nothing but personal opinion held only by Turnbull and a few politicians who truly have not got a clue, but touted it as an election issue. There are 100,000 signatures on the petition according to ABC Radio National this morning. This discussion between like minds on a small list like this is good but let's take it to millions of signatures. Roger
_______________________________________________ luv-main mailing list [email protected] http://lists.luv.asn.au/listinfo/luv-main
