lvs-users  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [lvs-users] keepalived+lvs Graeme Fowler
  • Re: [lvs-users] keepalived+lvs bedo
• [lvs-users] debugging ldirectord problem Ricardo Kleemann
  • Re: [lvs-users] debugging ldirectord problem Henrique Fernandes
  • Re: [lvs-users] debugging ldirectord problem Ricardo Kleemann
  • Re: [lvs-users] debugging ldirectord problem Henrique Fernandes
  • Re: [lvs-users] debugging ldirectord problem Ricardo Kleemann
  • Re: [lvs-users] debugging ldirectord problem Henrique Fernandes
  • Re: [lvs-users] debugging ldirectord problem Ricardo Kleemann
  • Re: [lvs-users] debugging ldirectord problem Henrique Fernandes
• [lvs-users] ldirectord and kerberos Mrvka Andreas
  • Re: [lvs-users] ldirectord and kerberos L.S. Keijser
  • Re: [lvs-users] ldirectord and kerberos Graeme Fowler
  • Re: [lvs-users] ldirectord and kerberos L.S. Keijser
  • Re: [lvs-users] ldirectord and kerberos Simon Horman
  • Re: [lvs-users] ldirectord and kerberos Mrvka Andreas
• [lvs-users] increase time wait for 504 gateway timeout MoroSwitie
  • Re: [lvs-users] increase time wait for 504 gateway timeout Graeme Fowler
  • Re: [lvs-users] increase time wait for 504 gateway timeout MoroSwitie
• [lvs-users] LVS hangs on 2.6.37 Simon Kirby
  • Re: [lvs-users] LVS hangs on 2.6.37 Julian Anastasov
  • Re: [lvs-users] LVS hangs on 2.6.37 Simon Kirby
  • Re: [lvs-users] LVS hangs on 2.6.37 Julian Anastasov
• [lvs-users] Could LVS/DR cause a bottleneck with media servers? Roger Littin
  • Re: [lvs-users] Could LVS/DR cause a bottleneck with media servers? Malcolm Turnbull
  • Re: [lvs-users] Could LVS/DR cause a bottleneck with media servers? Charlie Allom
  • Re: [lvs-users] Could LVS/DR cause a bottleneck with media servers? Roger Littin
• [lvs-users] net-snmp rpm for x86_64 available L.S. Keijser
  • Re: [lvs-users] net-snmp rpm for x86_64 available Michael Schwartzkopff
  • Re: [lvs-users] net-snmp rpm for x86_64 available L.S. Keijser
  • Re: [lvs-users] net-snmp rpm for x86_64 available Michael Schwartzkopff
  • Re: [lvs-users] net-snmp rpm for x86_64 available L.S. Keijser
  • Re: [lvs-users] net-snmp rpm for x86_64 available Michael Schwartzkopff
  • Re: [lvs-users] net-snmp rpm for x86_64 available Kobi Biton
• [lvs-users] IPv6 vs IPv4 fwmark services Ferenc Wagner
  • Re: [lvs-users] IPv6 vs IPv4 fwmark services Simon Horman
  • Re: [lvs-users] IPv6 vs IPv4 fwmark services Ferenc Wagner
  • Re: [lvs-users] IPv6 vs IPv4 fwmark services Sohgo Takeuchi
  • Re: [lvs-users] IPv6 vs IPv4 fwmark services Ferenc Wagner
  • Re: [lvs-users] IPv6 vs IPv4 fwmark services Sohgo Takeuchi
  • Re: [lvs-users] IPv6 vs IPv4 fwmark services Simon Horman
  • Re: [lvs-users] IPv6 vs IPv4 fwmark services Ferenc Wagner
  • Re: [lvs-users] IPv6 vs IPv4 fwmark services Simon Horman
  • Re: [lvs-users] IPv6 vs IPv4 fwmark services Sohgo Takeuchi
  • Re: [lvs-users] IPv6 vs IPv4 fwmark services Simon Horman
• [lvs-users] LVS-DR/ipvsadm displaying incorrect ActiveConn for custom TCP service Kon Wilms
  • Re: [lvs-users] LVS-DR/ipvsadm displaying incorrect ActiveConn for custom TCP service Simon Horman
  • Re: [lvs-users] LVS-DR/ipvsadm displaying incorrect ActiveConn for custom TCP service Simon Horman
  • Re: [lvs-users] LVS-DR/ipvsadm displaying incorrect ActiveConn for custom TCP service Kon Wilms
  • Re: [lvs-users] LVS-DR/ipvsadm displaying incorrect ActiveConn for custom TCP service Simon Horman
• [lvs-users] How to force real server weigth always be 1, although real server can't support workload? Suchada Pakapongpan
  • Re: [lvs-users] How to force real server weigth always be 1, although real server can't support workload? Graeme Fowler
• Re: [lvs-users] Ldirectord not respecting received text for https Colin Hines
  • Re: [lvs-users] Ldirectord not respecting received text for https Brent Jensen
• [lvs-users] LVS-DR capacity planning lvs list
  • Re: [lvs-users] LVS-DR capacity planning Malcolm Turnbull
  • Re: [lvs-users] LVS-DR capacity planning Simon Horman
  • Re: [lvs-users] LVS-DR capacity planning Joseph Mack NA3T
  • Re: [lvs-users] LVS-DR capacity planning Simon Horman
  • Re: [lvs-users] LVS-DR capacity planning lvs list
  • Re: [lvs-users] LVS-DR capacity planning Michael Ben-Nes
  • Re: [lvs-users] LVS-DR capacity planning Malcolm Turnbull
  • Re: [lvs-users] LVS-DR capacity planning Michael Schwartzkopff
  • Re: [lvs-users] LVS-DR capacity planning sagar patil
  • Re: [lvs-users] LVS-DR capacity planning Michael Schwartzkopff
  • Re: [lvs-users] LVS-DR capacity planning Joseph Mack NA3T
  • Re: [lvs-users] LVS-DR capacity planning Simon Horman
  • Re: [lvs-users] LVS-DR capacity planning Joseph Mack NA3T
  • Re: [lvs-users] LVS-DR capacity planning Graeme Fowler
• [lvs-users] net-snmp-lvs-module SRPM: 64-bit counters not showing up in snmpwalk of 1.3.6.1.4.1.8225.4711.17.1 David Warden
  • Re: [lvs-users] net-snmp-lvs-module SRPM: 64-bit counters not showing up in snmpwalk of 1.3.6.1.4.1.8225.4711.17.1 SOLVED David Warden
  • Re: [lvs-users] net-snmp-lvs-module SRPM: 64-bit counters not showing up in snmpwalk of 1.3.6.1.4.1.8225.4711.17.1 L.S. Keijser
  • Re: [lvs-users] net-snmp-lvs-module SRPM: 64-bit counters not showing up in snmpwalk of 1.3.6.1.4.1.8225.4711.17.1 Malcolm Turnbull
  • Re: [lvs-users] net-snmp-lvs-module SRPM: 64-bit counters not showing up in snmpwalk of 1.3.6.1.4.1.8225.4711.17.1 Michael Schwartzkopff
  • [lvs-users] LVS/DR Packet Loss Problem btinsley
  • Re: [lvs-users] LVS/DR Packet Loss Problem chchen
• [lvs-users] Fw: Is it possible to completely handoff the connection to the realserver? Roger Littin
  • Re: [lvs-users] Fw: Is it possible to completely handoff the connection to the realserver? Malcolm Turnbull
  • Re: [lvs-users] Fw: Is it possible to completely handoff the connection to the realserver? Joseph Mack NA3T
  • Re: [lvs-users] Fw: Is it possible to completely handoff the connection to the realserver? Roger Littin
  • Re: [lvs-users] Fw: Is it possible to completely handoff the connection to the realserver? Malte Geierhos
• [lvs-users] [ANNOUNCE] Keepalived 1.2.2 - IPv6 Ready Alexandre Cassen
• [lvs-users] LVS Arp-problem Humberto L Jucá
  • Re: [lvs-users] LVS Arp-problem Jay Faulkner
  • Re: [lvs-users] LVS Arp-problem Joseph Mack NA3T
• [lvs-users] loopback network vs IPv6 Ferenc Wagner
  • Re: [lvs-users] loopback network vs IPv6 Ferenc Wagner
• [lvs-users] Remove a real server from a virtual service: monitor requests continue on real server removed Lorenzo Cocchi
• [lvs-users] LVS changes in Linux 2.6.37 Simon Horman
• [lvs-users] LVS Client on director Michael Schwartzkopff
  • Re: [lvs-users] LVS Client on director L.S. Keijser
  • Re: [lvs-users] LVS Client on director Michael Schwartzkopff
  • Re: [lvs-users] LVS Client on director Charlie Allom
• [lvs-users] LVS-DR, squid & IPv6 Zeller, Jan (ID)
  • Re: [lvs-users] LVS-DR, squid & IPv6 Zeller, Jan (ID)
  • Re: [lvs-users] LVS-DR, squid & IPv6 Zeller, Jan (ID)
  • Re: [lvs-users] LVS-DR, squid & IPv6 Zeller, Jan (ID)
• [lvs-users] ldirectord fails to add a healthy server Kobi Biton
  • Re: [lvs-users] ldirectord fails to add a healthy server Simon Horman
  • Re: [lvs-users] ldirectord fails to add a healthy server Kobi Biton
  • Re: [lvs-users] ldirectord fails to add a healthy server Simon Horman
  • Re: [lvs-users] ldirectord fails to add a healthy server Kobi Biton
  • Re: [lvs-users] ldirectord fails to add a healthy server Simon Horman
  • Re: [lvs-users] ldirectord fails to add a healthy server Kobi Biton
• [lvs-users] LVS-NAT with Apache Reverse Proxy Robertson Dias
  • Re: [lvs-users] LVS-NAT with Apache Reverse Proxy Robertson Dias
• [lvs-users] Keepalived and LVS : invalid protocol and bad address Henri Storn
• [lvs-users] Loadbalacing (DR) without assigning the VIP to loadbalancer Ruben Laban
  • Re: [lvs-users] Loadbalacing (DR) without assigning the VIP to loadbalancer Graeme Fowler
  • Re: [lvs-users] Loadbalacing (DR) without assigning the VIP to loadbalancer Joseph Mack NA3T
  • Re: [lvs-users] Loadbalacing (DR) without assigning the VIP to loadbalancer Ruben Laban
• [lvs-users] ldirectord and tomcat cluster Mrvka Andreas
  • Re: [lvs-users] ldirectord and tomcat cluster Darren.Mansell
  • Re: [lvs-users] ldirectord and tomcat cluster Mrvka Andreas
  • Re: [lvs-users] ldirectord and tomcat cluster Darren.Mansell
• [lvs-users] problem with ipvs sync using two different interfaces as per keepalive config Patrick Schaaf
• [lvs-users] ipvs does not sync DNATted or fwmarked connection state Patrick Schaaf
  • Re: [lvs-users] ipvs does not sync DNATted or fwmarked connection state Simon Horman
  • Re: [lvs-users] ipvs does not sync DNATted or fwmarked connection state Patrick Schaaf
• [lvs-users] How to get number of active sessions for each RIP? Suchada Pakapongpan
• [lvs-users] LVS HA creates a big amount of log data Marco Passerini
• [lvs-users] In LVS-RD , The nginx cannot receive the request from LVS, while the real server receives the correct package . Allen He
  • [lvs-users] [FIXED, by echo 0>/proc/../conf/{all, default}/rp_filter]Re: In LVS-RD , The nginx cannot receive the request from LVS, while the real server receives the correct package . Allen He
• Re: [lvs-users] IPVS with SNAT support on the kernel 2.6.36 + iptables v1.4.10 Patrick Schaaf
  • Re: [lvs-users] IPVS with SNAT support on the kernel 2.6.36 + iptables v1.4.10 Patrick Schaaf
  • Re: [lvs-users] IPVS with SNAT support on the kernel 2.6.36 + iptables v1.4.10 Julian Anastasov
• [lvs-users] [ANNOUNCE] keepalived 1.2.1 Alexandre Cassen
  • Re: [lvs-users] [Keepalived-devel] [ANNOUNCE] keepalived 1.2.1 Jan Hugo Prins
  • Re: [lvs-users] [Keepalived-devel] [ANNOUNCE] keepalived 1.2.1 Alexandre Cassen
  • [lvs-users] Ldirectord not respecting received text for https Brent Jensen
  • Re: [lvs-users] Ldirectord not respecting received text for https Simon Horman
  • Re: [lvs-users] Ldirectord not respecting received text for https Brent Jensen
  • Re: [lvs-users] Ldirectord not respecting received text for https Brent Jensen
  • Re: [lvs-users] Ldirectord not respecting received text for https Sohgo Takeuchi
  • Re: [lvs-users] Ldirectord not respecting received text for https Brent Jensen
  • Re: [lvs-users] Ldirectord not respecting received text for https Malcolm Turnbull
  • Re: [lvs-users] Ldirectord not respecting received text for https Brent Jensen
  • Re: [lvs-users] Ldirectord not respecting received text for https Sohgo Takeuchi
  • Re: [lvs-users] [Keepalived-devel] [ANNOUNCE] keepalived 1.2.1 Jan Hugo Prins
• [lvs-users] bogus sync message size Hei Chan
  • Re: [lvs-users] bogus sync message size Simon Horman
  • Re: [lvs-users] bogus sync message size Hei Chan
• Re: [lvs-users] is it possible tohave ldirectorand realcluster server on same physical machine? Darren.Mansell
  • Re: [lvs-users] is it possible tohave ldirectorand realcluster server on same physical machine? Mrvka Andreas
• Re: [lvs-users] is it possible to have ldirectorand realcluster server on same physical machine? Darren.Mansell
  • Re: [lvs-users] is it possible to have ldirectorand realcluster server on same physical machine? Mrvka Andreas
• Re: [lvs-users] is it possible to have ldirector and realcluster server on same physical machine? Darren.Mansell
  • Re: [lvs-users] is it possible to have ldirector and realcluster server on same physical machine? Mrvka Andreas
• Re: [lvs-users] is it possible to have ldirector and real cluster server on same physical machine? Darren.Mansell
  • Re: [lvs-users] is it possible to have ldirector and real cluster server on same physical machine? Mrvka Andreas
  • Re: [lvs-users] is it possible to have ldirector and real cluster server on same physical machine? Darren.Mansell
• [lvs-users] is it possible to have ldirector and real cluster server on same physical machine? Mrvka Andreas
  • Re: [lvs-users] is it possible to have ldirector and real cluster server on same physical machine? Simon Horman
  • Re: [lvs-users] is it possible to have ldirector and real cluster server on same physical machine? Mrvka Andreas
  • Re: [lvs-users] is it possible to have ldirector and real cluster server on same physical machine? Mrvka Andreas
  • Re: [lvs-users] is it possible to have ldirector and real cluster server on same physical machine? Jeff Norguet
  • Re: [lvs-users] is it possible to have ldirector and real cluster server on same physical machine? Mrvka Andreas
  • Re: [lvs-users] is it possible to have ldirector and real cluster server on same physical machine? Mrvka Andreas
• [lvs-users] LVS-TUN with Debian and SIP duane . larson
• [lvs-users] Differences between ipvsadm and /proc/net/ip_vs David Donchez
  • Re: [lvs-users] Differences between ipvsadm and /proc/net/ip_vs Simon Horman
  • Re: [lvs-users] Differences between ipvsadm and /proc/net/ip_vs David Donchez
  • Re: [lvs-users] Differences between ipvsadm and /proc/net/ip_vs Graeme Fowler
• [lvs-users] Can't find IP_VS option on menuconfig when compiling 2.6.36 Chuanyong Teng
• [lvs-users] LVS / RHEL 5.3 / iptables problem devin
  • Re: [lvs-users] LVS / RHEL 5.3 / iptables problem Joseph Mack NA3T
• [lvs-users] not forwarding packets to a RS until all other RS gets down (spare mode) ademassougnes
  • Re: [lvs-users] not forwarding packets to a RS until all other RS gets down (spare mode) Simon Horman
  • Re: [lvs-users] not forwarding packets to a RS until all other RS gets down (spare mode) Willem de Groot
• [lvs-users] Check out my photos on Facebook Kosol Poka-anon
• [lvs-users] FW: [jmob] Re: Why RUBiS load not balance? Suchada Pakapongpan
  • Re: [lvs-users] FW: [jmob] Re: Why RUBiS load not balance? Simon Horman
• [lvs-users] Invitation to connect on LinkedIn Maeda Taqu
  • Re: [lvs-users] Invitation to connect on LinkedIn Graeme Fowler
  • Re: [lvs-users] Invitation to connect on LinkedIn Adrian Chapela
  • [lvs-users] Invitation to connect on LinkedIn lok yin
  • [lvs-users] Admin - Re: Invitation to connect on LinkedIn Graeme Fowler
• [lvs-users] syn flood strategies Willem de Groot
• [lvs-users] Got error when start real webserver during test time Suchada Pakapongpan
  • Re: [lvs-users] Got error when start real webserver during test time L.S. Keijser
  • Re: [lvs-users] Got error when start real webserver during test time Suchada Pakapongpan
  • Re: [lvs-users] Got error when start real webserver during test time L.S. Keijser
  • Re: [lvs-users] Got error when start real webserver during test time Suchada Pakapongpan
• [lvs-users] how to set default weight=100 Suchada Pakapongpan
  • Re: [lvs-users] how to set default weight=100 Simon Horman
• [lvs-users] how to get ActiveConn value Suchada Pakapongpan
  • Re: [lvs-users] how to get ActiveConn value Graeme Fowler
  • Re: [lvs-users] how to get ActiveConn value Suchada Pakapongpan
  • Re: [lvs-users] how to get ActiveConn value Himanshu Raina
• [lvs-users] AUTO: Jonathan Trott is out of the office (returning 01/12/2010) Jonathan Trott
• [lvs-users] IPVS with SNAT support on the kernel 2.6.36 + iptables v1.4.10 Ivan Havlicek
  • Re: [lvs-users] IPVS with SNAT support on the kernel 2.6.36 + iptables v1.4.10 Malcolm Turnbull
  • Re: [lvs-users] IPVS with SNAT support on the kernel 2.6.36 + iptables v1.4.10 Ivan Havlicek
  • Re: [lvs-users] IPVS with SNAT support on the kernel 2.6.36 + iptables v1.4.10 Julian Anastasov
  • Re: [lvs-users] IPVS with SNAT support on the kernel 2.6.36 + iptables v1.4.10 Ivan Havlicek
  • Re: [lvs-users] IPVS with SNAT support on the kernel 2.6.36 + iptables v1.4.10 sven _
  • Re: [lvs-users] IPVS with SNAT support on the kernel 2.6.36 + iptables v1.4.10 Julian Anastasov
  • Re: [lvs-users] IPVS with SNAT support on the kernel 2.6.36 + iptables v1.4.10 sven _
  • Re: [lvs-users] IPVS with SNAT support on the kernel 2.6.36 + iptables v1.4.10 Ivan Havlicek
  • Re: [lvs-users] IPVS with SNAT support on the kernel 2.6.36 + iptables v1.4.10 Julian Anastasov

• Earlier messages
• Later messages