It may not be about having an integrated desktop or manpower or even 
comparing with the many features of other desktop environment.  Maybe it 
would be better to have a specific objective and then use that for 
marketing and for responding to questions.  I'd suggest that the 
objective to be "good performance on slow hardware and small memory 
environments". Even that matches the name, the current description, and 
the original representations: "simple", "fast", "lightweight", 
"resource-careful", "low memory usage", "suitable for older machines ... 
or ... restricted environments."

It would be nice if LXDE didn't try to be as featureful as the 
competition if it will become as slow or inefficient as they are. Even 
some studies have shown that the smaller XFCE to be actually more a 
resource hog than GNOME. (Note I have not researched that myself or 
checked if it is still true.)

It may be good for the core LXDE developers (or even survey much of 
audience) to define the limited hardware goals periodically (maybe every 
two years re-evaluate it) and then provide some real tests to prove that 
the system is practical with those restrictions. (For example: maybe 500 
MHz processor with 256MB memory.)  Whenever new features are suggested 
compare the results with the requirements.  If the "lightweight" system 
continues to be bloated it will just become like the rest and may not 
have any distinguishing purpose.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single
web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware,
SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial.
Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov
_______________________________________________
Lxde-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxde-list

Reply via email to