Transifex isn't without setup nor downsides. Polluting the git history is something we do not want to do on LXQt. If LXDE wants to move to transifex, I have no objections, but I cannot take care of it.
On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 12:11 AM, Alexey Loginov <loginov.alex.va...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I do not want to have bad translations for LXQT. LXDE and LXQT should > go to transifex. I could not translate 1 year, pootle was down again > and again. I translated 3 month ago and my translation is not in > upstream. Do you realy think pootle is workable? You see nothing how > you loose translators and users. > Transifex has synchronization with git - no barriers to use it. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140 _______________________________________________ Lxde-list mailing list Lxde-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxde-list
