Walter Lapchynski wrote: > On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Ronnie <mrwi...@riseup.net > <mailto:mrwi...@riseup.net>>wrote: > > Your insistence on trying to back seat drive this project only > encouraged me to readd the lubuntu resources that I removed out of > courtesy. Some times you should quit while your ahead... > > > The only reason I have ever made suggestions regarding LXLE's support > resources is because LXLE ends up with disappointed users. LXLE users > come to non-LXLE support areas because either of misleading > information (thus my suggestions) ​and/or because they get no response > at LXLE support areas. This is not going to negatively affect me or > any of your upstreams— it will negatively affect your users. If your > users are not something you care about, please continue. > > -- > @wxl | polka.bike > C563 CAC5 8BE1 2F22 A49D > 68F6 8B57 A48B C4F2 051A LXLE uses the LXDE desktop, there is nothing 'misleading' about that. I removed the Lubuntu resources even though they were listed as 'external resources' just to play nice. I'm not removing LXDE support areas simply because that is the only desktop the distro offers. Hence making it a relevant resource. The forum users always get a reply, unless they are simply making a statement. As far as LXLE users asking for help in non LXLE areas. People ask for help with lots of things in many places that aren't exactly 'appropriate'. If everyone went to the 'proper' places, site like stackexchange wouldn't exist. I can't control what other people do or where they go...
BTW, is LXQT ever making it to the default desktop...? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Lxde-list mailing list Lxde-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxde-list