Walter Lapchynski wrote: > > LXLE uses the LXDE desktop, there is nothing 'misleading' about > that. I'm not removing LXDE support areas simply > because that is the only desktop the distro offers. Hence making it a > relevant resource. > > > Agreed. I'll try to reiterate my original point: > " > One good way to resolve this would be to separate the primary forms of > support (those related specifically to LXLE) and additional releases, > perhaps making it clear that LXDE does not provide official support > for the project. > " > > tl;dr I didn't say remove them. I said rearrange them and make them a > little more clear. > > This will reduce the likelihood of someone coming to #lxde looking for > an LXLE ISO. > > For that matter, including Lubuntu as a resource isn't terrible, as > long as you make it clear it shouldn't be the primary source of support. > > So something like: > > LXLE SUPPORT > ============= > * LXLE OS Forums > * LXLE OS Wiki > * LXLE OS ML > * LXLE OS IRC > > UPSTREAM RESOURCES > ===================== > * LXDE Forums > * LXDE Wiki > * LXDE ML > * LXDE IRC > * Lubuntu Forums > * Lubuntu Wiki > * Lubuntu ML > * Lubuntu IRC > -- > @wxl | polka.bike > C563 CAC5 8BE1 2F22 A49D > 68F6 8B57 A48B C4F2 051A Funny, as that is the way I had the support pages separated before and you still had a problem with it.. If I get to it, I'll get to it.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Lxde-list mailing list Lxde-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxde-list
