Walter Lapchynski wrote: > > Maybe making clear those additional resources are not the best way to > get help would be good. In fact, putting them on a separate "external > links" page would probably be best. > > Also my primary experience with LXLE users seeking support is through > IRC. I checked today and there were 4 users on #lxle on Freenode, > there was no welcome message, and no topic. Every time someone comes > around to e.g. #Lubuntu, it's because they don't get any response at > #lxle. Maybe throwing some more resources that way, might be helpful. > > Oh and I neglected to answer before: LXQt is not ready to be default > in Lubuntu yet. Or, well, we're not ready. Or both. Plus we have > applications to pick out. My hope is we'll have an additional image to > test this cycle, but it depends on many things. I will say that there > has been some discussion of offering both the GTK and Qt options, but > it's premature to say anything definitive. > > @wxl | polka.bike > c563 cac5 8be1 2f22 a49d > 68f6 8b57 a48b c4f2 051a > > > On Nov 22, 2016 18:08, "Ronnie" <mrwi...@riseup.net > <mailto:mrwi...@riseup.net>> wrote: > > Walter Lapchynski wrote: > > > > LXLE uses the LXDE desktop, there is nothing 'misleading' about > > that. I'm not removing LXDE support areas simply > > because that is the only desktop the distro offers. Hence > making it a > > relevant resource. > > > > > > Agreed. I'll try to reiterate my original point: > > " > > One good way to resolve this would be to separate the primary > forms of > > support (those related specifically to LXLE) and additional > releases, > > perhaps making it clear that LXDE does not provide official support > > for the project. > > " > > > > tl;dr I didn't say remove them. I said rearrange them and make > them a > > little more clear. > > > > This will reduce the likelihood of someone coming to #lxde > looking for > > an LXLE ISO. > > > > For that matter, including Lubuntu as a resource isn't terrible, as > > long as you make it clear it shouldn't be the primary source of > support. > > > > So something like: > > > > LXLE SUPPORT > > ============= > > * LXLE OS Forums > > * LXLE OS Wiki > > * LXLE OS ML > > * LXLE OS IRC > > > > UPSTREAM RESOURCES > > ===================== > > * LXDE Forums > > * LXDE Wiki > > * LXDE ML > > * LXDE IRC > > * Lubuntu Forums > > * Lubuntu Wiki > > * Lubuntu ML > > * Lubuntu IRC > > -- > > @wxl | polka.bike > > C563 CAC5 8BE1 2F22 A49D > > 68F6 8B57 A48B C4F2 051A > Funny, as that is the way I had the support pages separated before and > you still had a problem with it.. If I get to it, I'll get to it. > So let me get this straight. The problem is people coming to Lubuntu/LXDE resources asking for help with LXLE, yet putting Lubuntu/LXDE support areas in an external resources area would be fine? If the Lubuntu/LXDE resources are listed, then LXLE users will continue to visit those areas for help. I'll get around to separating them but then I would argue that perhaps in the future, questions about LXLE in Lubuntu areas should be expected and not rejected.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Lxde-list mailing list Lxde-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxde-list
