Imho i would release ist in the 0.11.x seriese - the changes might be sufficient for a new minor number butto be true - it remains minor ...
So i would suggest to release it as 0.11.x - i did not think that the software will be better with a higher number. As i wrote last time - the time for releases is right now, if the packages are release ready - we put lxqt-build-tools in place so the new pcmanfm-qt and libfm-qt will not depend any longer on liblxqt - and that ease more frequent releases a lot .. Beside of that i planning to release the "simple" components of our project that not depend on liblxqt today or tomorrow - same reason, drop the liblxqt dependency and use our new and shiny build tools. For the upcoming 0.12.x release series i would like to have some improvements in all of our components - first of all a cli-interface with a least -h --help, -v --version and if feaseble a usage cli output. Esp. the --version thing could help us a lot if we put the liblxqt-version, Qt-Version and other relevant data in it. Cheers Alf On 10.12.2016 16:44, PCMan wrote: > I plan to release pcmanfm-qt and libfm-qt recently. > This can be a major release since it brings several new features and > API changes. > About libfm, when to release is up to its current maintainer Andriy > and I don't plan to touch it. > Having the same release cycle with the whole LXQt seems to be a good idea. > We can try to do that later. > If we can make new releases of the whole LXQt more often that will > even be better. > > Cheers! > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms. With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE. Training and support from Colfax. Order your platform today.http://sdm.link/xeonphi _______________________________________________ Lxde-list mailing list Lxde-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxde-list
