On Wed, 12 May 2004, Henry Nelson wrote: > On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 11:34:47PM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I tested the patch on Linux today, and improved it. > > Do you intend on submitting "the patch" to lynx-dev, i.e., have it > incorporated into the code base?
As I wrote before, I'm not sure whether my patch's approach for translating between UTF-8 and Japanese encodings is good or not. More specifically, my patch let Lynx translate UTF-8 into Japanese encodings using iconv but translate UTF-8 into other encodings using included tables. Having big table, which includes between UTF-8 and Japanese, might be better than that. Or having no table and using iconv for all translation might be better (though it may need big change)... And there's one more problem that we may not be able to use iconv in all environment. However, I think it's not so bad idea to introduce a new configure option like --enable-exp-JapaneseUTF8-support. -- Takeshi Hataguchi E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Lynx-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev
