On 30-Mar-2000 Lars Gullik Bj�nnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>| This may of course be a function of my using lyxstring
>| rather than STL string? How much would I need to hack the
>| code base to remove those calls to string::clear() I wonder?
>
> I think we have to "bite i det sure eplet"� and ditch lyxstring, it
Well we have the same in German "In den sauren Apfel beissen" :)
> has served us well and it was fun to implement. std::string::clear ==
> std::string::erase(), so q tags-query-replace on all the code should
> be enough to fix that one. A harder problem is that on some
> implementations of std::sting (egcs's) the arguments to
> std::string::replace is in the wrong order so this need to be verified
> and investigated.
What I don't understand is why you want to ditch it right now?
J�rgen
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. J�rgen Vigna E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Italienallee 13/N Tel: +39-0471-450260
I-39100 Bozen Fax: +39-0471-450296
ITALY Web: http://www.sad.it/~jug
Well, Jim, I'm not much of an actor either.
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
