Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I can compile out of the box with egcs-1.1.2 and gcc-2.95.2 using this STL
| implementation. They also use a different string implementation to just
| about everyone on the planet (same interface different philosophy).
And this is because they (falsely) claim that a reference counted
string cannot be thread safe if implemented in the obvious way, they
use this as a marketing trick to get people to use their rope
implementation.
Lgb
- Re: Unaligned access question Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Unaligned access question Angus Leeming
- Re: Unaligned access question Lars Gullik Bj�nnes
- Re: Unaligned access question Angus Leeming
- Re: Unaligned access question Garst R. Reese
- Re: Unaligned access question Angus Leeming
- Re: Unaligned access question Lars Gullik Bj�nnes
- Re: Unaligned access question Martin Vermeer
- Re: Unaligned access questi... Allan Rae
- Re: Unaligned access question Allan Rae
- Re: Unaligned access question Lars Gullik Bj�nnes
- Re: Unaligned access question Juergen Vigna
- Re: Unaligned access question Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Unaligned access question Angus Leeming
- Re: Unaligned access question Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Unaligned access question Angus Leeming
- Re: Unaligned access question Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Unaligned access question Lars Gullik Bj�nnes
- Re: Unaligned access question Angus Leeming
