Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> It is, but it seems that this was the reason, why we don't have it yet, so
> lets make a decision now and implement it.

These are two additional lines of code. I doubt that this stopped someone from 
implementing it.

>  >> That would indeed be useful. Richard's todays new InTOC feature will
> make >> this possible as far as I saw.
>  >
>  > I'm not sure. That would mean that *matter and appendix should be
> implemented > as insets. I don't think this is the way to go, technically.
>
> Why not? Everything that currently appears in the TOC is an inset or
> environment. 

But this is conceptually different than everything else in the TOC. It's not a 
paragraph style.

> What else do you have in mind?

As already written: the same as we have for appendix.

Jürgen

Reply via email to