On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 05:16:55PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 28. Oktober 2015 um 11:45:46, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > <skost...@lyx.org> > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 04:36:26PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > > > We should also create a directory containing some uncompilable lyx-files > > > which are supposed > > > to compile in the future due to corrected handling in lyx. > > > > > > How about "development/attic/testdocs"? > > > > > > They would be the first to test with newly fixed lyx. If some of them > > > compile, they can be removed. > > > > Why removed? Don't we want to make sure they keep compiling? Or you mean > > that they should be moved back to the main documentation folder? > > Sorry for the confusion. I mean e.g. manual files which do not compile > because lyx creates erroneous tex file. > (No ERT or bad preamble code) > If such file now compiles, then we don't need it anymore. We have still the > manual.
Ah I see what you mean. > > I agree that we need a folder for documents that we don't want in our > > main documentation. I think we should have both documents that we expect > > to compile in there (e.g. to prevent regressions) and documents that we > > hope compile in the future. The reason for this mixing and not having > > e.g. two separate folders is because often one document will compile for > > one format and not for another. > > Under 'it compiles' I meant "document compiles for _all_ possible formats" OK. Scott
