On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 03:13:12PM -0500, Richard Heck wrote: > On 11/24/2015 03:05 PM, Georg Baum wrote: > > Of course tex2lyx should either do a perfect roundtrip, or create > > proper ERT for the new feature. If it does not, then this has to be > > fixed. However, if there is a bug in tex2lyx that makes it produce > > invalid output for the new feature, which can also be triggered > > without the new feature, then I'd see this as completely independent > > and would even allow the new feature without a tex2lyx fix > > I was thinking that LyX's own support for the feature might mean the bug > becomes easier to trigger.
Good point. If we decide on anything it would be nice to add it back into Development.lyx. Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
