On 2016-09-20, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 01:24:02AM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
>> > > * change the comment from ERT to comment >> > >> > I did not think of this possibility. I like it. >> > >> > > * invert the test (we already have several cases of inverted:ERT) >> I'd say, since it is ERT, which means 'latex', use the suggested \'{e}. However, with default output (pdflatex), the ERT compiles fine, even with all other export routes except the "exotic" XeTeX+TeX-fonts (because of the special encoding-restriction of this combination)! > I was at first against this because I thought the ERT inset was meant to > be read by French readers of the LyX beamer manual, and \'{e} looks ugly > (don't we use LyX to avoid backslashes and brackets?). Yes. > But at the same time I don't think it makes sense to deviate from the > original (English) version, where ERT is used. Yes. > So I think you are right that is the way to go, unless we want to > change all versions of the Beamer manual to a comment or note inset, > and that seems like more work than should be done for this trivial > issue. Yes. -> invert the test (pdf4_texF) > Changed to \'{e} in stable at 9f3518bc and cherry-picked to master at > 1c7835c0. > Thanks for the discussion. I now have a better idea of how to deal with > this for similar issues when they come up. I don't think this is the right way. The documentation is for documentation, test-use is secondary and "exotic tests" don't merit changes that make the documentation more difficult to read. Günter