Le 14/02/2018 à 00:12, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
I think the sections in Additional.lyx about obsolete document classes
should be removed. I propose the create a new LyX file in Git's attic folder
which will contain the deleted sections.
When you delete the sections, please do t for all language versions of
Additional.lyx in branch an master.
Jean-Pierre, did you finish the work that you planned on 2.3.x regarding
I'm almost done with the documentation part, I have edited all Additional.lyx
files and moved AGUTeX.lyx in templates/obsolete. I see that I should have put
an original version of Additional.lyx in the attic, I will do it with
appropriate LyX notes.
I'm going to delete jgrga.layout and agums.layout, which were used by pre-2008
agutex.cls and reused by aguplus.cls (which is still in TeXLive, but obsolete in
CTAN, so I think it will not be part anymore of TeXLive2018).
aguplus (1999) was in turn obsoleted by post-2008 agutex.cls, which included
jgrga and agums (and others) as class options coded in the class file instead of
external .sty files.
Currently, here I can compile successfully AGUTeX.lyx which used agutex.layout
and post-2008 agutex.cls, that I have installed in my texmf-local tree in 2013
when it was available.
As it is now impossible to find the agutex.cls class (agujournal.cls is the
current AGU class), the template/obsolete/AGUTeX.lyx can only be compiled if one
has kept the class file in one's texmf-local tree, and this only for the sake of
recreation of the pdf of an old paper, any new paper needing agujournal.
So should I remove also template/obsolete/AGUTeX.lyx? What is the compilation
status of other obsoleted templates?
As for EGS, I'm going to remove egs.layout as well, the class is obsolete since
2001, and there is no template.
I do not think that it is feasible to build a layout and template for the new
agujournal.cls and copernicus.cls classes for 2.3.0, it will involve strings
The AGUTeX wiki page
is completely out of date for Linux, I will edit that also.