On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 9:49 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann
<engelm...@uni-tuebingen.de> wrote:
> I try to use ClassicThesis under Lyx.
> I unpacked this:
> (classicthesis-v4.2 is a bugfix release of the classic thesis template that
> for the first time introduces BibLaTeX, a powerful package for formatting
> citations and references. Due to lacking support in LyX, several hacks have
> been applied (wiki.lyx.org/BibTeX/Biblatex) so that standard LyX dialogs
> could be used for citation input, and bibliography databases found during
> compilation. BibLaTeX is capable of employing several backends for
> bibliography management; we provide two: biber, the preferred and most
> capable one (but still immature and sometimes glitchy), and bibtex8. If both
> fail for you, revert to the old bibliography management with BibTeX.)
> and followed this:
> Test the template by opening and compiling ClassicThesis.lyx in this order:
> 1-classicthesis-LyX-v4.2_biblatex_biber/ (tested and worked with TeX Live
> 2014 on Fedora Linux 22)
> 2-classicthesis-LyX-v4.2_biblatex_bibtex8/ (tested and worked with MikTeX
> 2.9 on Windows as well)
> 3-classicthesis-LyX-v4.1_bugfix/
> Note that this is the same template set up in three different ways - you
> will be using only one of the folders.
> Under Kubuntu (14. ) and using Lyx2.2.0 (of 23.5.2016)
> I get the following errors:
> 1- csquotes.sty not found
> 2- csquotes.sty not found
> 3- mparlack.sty not found

Use Search the contents of packages:

A quick search shows you need to install texlive-latex-extra. Not sure
about mparlack.sty, though.

> Under Debian (GNU/Linux 8.4 (jessie) Release: 8.4) and using Lyx2.2.0 (of
> 23.5.2016) I get the following errors:
> 1- biblatex.sty not found
> 2- biblatex.sty not found
> 3- beramono.sty not found

Here it should probably be texlive-bibtex-extra and texlive-fonts-extra.


> What do I have to do to get it working (especially the one under Kubuntu)?
> Could it be a texlive issue?
> Wolfgang

Do you think you know what math is?
Or what it means to be intelligent?
Think again:

Reply via email to