On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 02:21:43PM +0200, Ralf wrote: > > I'll have a look. There is certainly something fishy there.... > > I could live with that. I had to before (defining something like > \Lim=\lim\limits), but as I said in version 1.2.0 I can't even change the > position of the limits not even in displayed formulas! That's a big problem.
M-m l cycles between the three options '\limits', '\nolimits' and '', so maybe you just have to press M-m l twice to see some effect. It seems to work in 1.3.0cvs and I think there have been no change in this area since 1.2.0 > As for this there is no need to do anything. It is enough to put "intlimits" > or "sumlimit" into the extra document options and use amsmath. And it works. > As far as I know there is no amsmath option that does the same for inline > formulas. That's why I thought it could be provided by LyX, in a similar way > like the float options. They are also used for the whole document. so why not > have a check box that, if checked, would lead to the insertion of \limits > after every inlined \lim command (or \int or \sum) The float options interface is not exactly nice and I don't think it is a good idea to have more of it... Andre' PS: Posts containing a full name have a better chance to get through my spam prevention machinery (as in "look at the sender/subject line and only if this triggers positive feelings do not press 'd'"). I understand that the netiquette do not require a full name outside the de.* but I thought I should mention this nevertheless...) -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
