USB to serial converter with a 6ft cable can be ordered directly from the
OEM of the chip for a reasonable price. See
http://www.ftdichip.com/Products/Cables/USBRS232.htm#UC232R-10. Just a DB25
connector w/housing has to be fitted to it.

Georg
Am 02.12.2015 21:28 schrieb "Kurt McCullum" <kurt.mccul...@att.net>:

> Thanks for the confirmation Don,
>
> There was suggestion to use two low profile gender changers, one male/male
> and one female/female to make it work on with he M100.
>
> The $45 price tag is a bit steep. I'm not sure when it went up but that
> was the closest thing I found to the perfect off the shelf USB cable.
>
> Kurt
>
> On 12/2/2015 10:17 AM, Donald Kyllo wrote:
>
>> Hi Kurt,
>> I have one of these cables and yes, the housing is too thick for the
>> M100.  It works fine for the 102 and 200.
>>
>> Don
>>
>> On 12/02/2015 09:50 AM, Kurt McCullum wrote:
>>
>>> I can't check all the details right now but I believe this is the USB to
>>> db25 male null modem cable I posted about a few months back. Though the
>>> price at that time was $25 not $45.
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.ebay.com/itm/FTDI-USB-DB-25-Male-Serial-RS-232-Null-Modem-with-Full-Modem-Handshake-Cable-/161782416490?hash=item25aafbc46a:g:U84AAOSwyQtV2kfV
>>>
>>> Also, I think the housing is too thick for the M100 but there was
>>> somebody on the list that tested it with both the 102 and 200 and it worked
>>> fine.
>>>
>>> Kurt
>>>
>>> On 12/2/2015 9:00 AM, John R. Hogerhuis wrote:
>>>
>>>> If you were building one I would recommend an all in one cable that
>>>> hooks straight from a USB port to any model t particularly the model 100
>>>> with no adapters necessary.
>>>>
>>>> Also it should be full null rather than defeating flow control as the
>>>> old complink cable did in order to support programs like HTERM which rely
>>>> on flow control.
>>>>
>>>> And ftdi is the only way to go on Windows.
>>>>
>>>> Maybe a very small pcb that can be built into a thin hood shell with a
>>>> surface mounted ftdi chip and max232?
>>>>
>>>> All that said you could accomplish mostly the same thing by simply
>>>> aggregating the proper OTS parts and software and offering it for sale as a
>>>> package with documentation. That way it takes out all the research and
>>>> guesswork and that's the real trouble.
>>>>
>>>> -- John.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to