I intend to find out! for moving 1.6MB into the M100/T200, I think it should make a difference.
My Rx loop reads a byte and places it directly in the target location. can't go much faster than that. On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 8:32 PM, John R. Hogerhuis <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 3:18 PM, Stephen Adolph <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I have an update. >> I ran 76800 baud from T200 to T200 successfully with no errors for 3 days >> of continual I/O. >> In this experiment, I had a small delay at the Tx end between >> transmissions. >> >> When I remove that delay, transmission corrupts right away. So, I think >> the problem in this case is receiver delay.. it cannot keep up with the >> transmitter. >> >> Overall it seems that 76800 does work, so long as you ensure your Rx >> function is fast. >> >> >> > So do you think with a tight ML receive loop (as opposed to the BASIC RX > queue and interpreter overhead) that 76800 should work on T200 without any > delays inserted? > > -- John. >
