http://bitchin100.com/wiki/index.php?title=VT100
Link to the page.. Hope that helps. Steve On Friday, June 19, 2020, Stephen Adolph <[email protected]> wrote: > Well what do you want screen 1 to be? > > Option 1. A real DVI, with original DVI software > > Option 2. Using my hack of the DVI software, and the MVT100 video adapter > > Option 3. Using my hack of the DVI software plus an rs232 connected > terminal as the display > > I believe i have posted the software at bitchin100. MTV100 adapter is > still waiting for parts . Hopefully I will have kits soon. > > Steve > > > On Friday, June 19, 2020, Dan Higdon <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Where do I get whatever I need to add "screen 1" as a valid command? >> It occurs to me that I can actually use PuTTY to be my 80x25 display >> while I'm working my way up to building a vt100 connector. >> Thanks, >> Dan >> >> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 10:11 PM Mike Stein <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Welcome to the list and the 'Model T' community! >>> >>> As a matter of fact several slightly different external 80x25 video >>> adapters do exist, although unlike the DVI which connects to the system bus >>> these connect either to the RS-232 com port or, with a minor board mod, to >>> the BCR port. >>> >>> See >>> http://bitchin100.com/wiki/index.php?title=File:VT100_1.jpg >>> >>> and >>> http://bitchin100.com/wiki/index.php?title=BCR_TTL_SERIAL_HACK >>> >>> for a version adapted to the M100 by Steve Adolph, a list member, >>> currently awaiting production quantity parts. >>> >>> Note that the BCR port mod may be superseded by a different internal >>> connection. >>> >>> m >>> >>> ---- Original Message ----- >>> >>> *From:* David B <[email protected]> >>> *To:* [email protected] >>> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 17, 2020 7:48 PM >>> *Subject:* [M100] Video out adapter? >>> >>> Hi just got a (working!) model 100 off eBay and replaced the nicd >>> battery. So far, so good. >>> >>> Learning about this computer and just read there was a combined external >>> disk and video adapter. I'm interested in the external video part. Has >>> anyone designed an external video adapter for this, that can be built by a >>> hobbyist? >>> >>> thanks, >>> David >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> *From:* M100 <[email protected]> on behalf of >>> [email protected] <[email protected]> >>> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 17, 2020 1:39 PM >>> *To:* [email protected] <[email protected]> >>> *Subject:* M100 Digest, Vol 114, Issue 12 >>> >>> Send M100 mailing list submissions to >>> [email protected] >>> >>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >>> http://lists.bitchin100.com/listinfo.cgi/m100-bitchin100.com >>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >>> [email protected] >>> >>> You can reach the person managing the list at >>> [email protected] >>> >>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >>> than "Re: Contents of M100 digest..." >>> >>> >>> Today's Topics: >>> >>> 1. Rexcpm update (Stephen Adolph) >>> 2. Re: Rexcpm update (David Rogers) >>> 3. Re: Noisy T102 (B 9) >>> 4. Re: Noisy T102 (Erik van der Tier) >>> 5. Re: Noisy T102 (Erik van der Tier) >>> 6. Re: Noisy T102 (Stephen Adolph) >>> 7. Re: Noisy T102 (Jim Toth) >>> 8. Re: Noisy T102 (Mike Stein) >>> 9. Re: Rexcpm update (Bert Put) >>> 10. Re: Noisy T102 (Alex ...) >>> 11. Annotated disassemble of T102 rom (Erik van der Tier) >>> 12. Re: Annotated disassemble of T102 rom (Stephen Adolph) >>> 13. Re: Annotated disassemble of T102 rom (Ken Pettit) >>> 14. Re: Annotated disassemble of T102 rom (Erik van der Tier) >>> 15. Re: Annotated disassemble of T102 rom (Erik van der Tier) >>> 16. Re: Annotated disassemble of T102 rom (Ken Pettit) >>> 17. Tandy 200 Black Screen (ethan saul) >>> 18. Re: Tandy 200 Black Screen (Stephen Adolph) >>> >>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> Message: 1 >>> Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 22:11:30 -0400 >>> From: Stephen Adolph <[email protected]> >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: [M100] Rexcpm update >>> Message-ID: >>> <CAMCMnV7XfUGfhuq2w+iNW9Qm77wVUhXzHew+QOdGAZ2adgzobg@mail. >>> gmail.com> >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >>> >>> I am well into the 2nd build of REXCPM. All of the REXCPM modules are >>> built, untested, but I still need to build the adapters. >>> So good progress. I'm aiming to ship the next tranch in 2 weeks or >>> sooner. >>> Steve >>> -------------- next part -------------- >>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >>> URL: <http://lists.bitchin100.com/private.cgi/m100-bitchin100.com >>> /attachments/20200616/892a2d16/attachment-0001.html> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> Message: 2 >>> Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 19:43:57 -0700 >>> From: David Rogers <[email protected]> >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [M100] Rexcpm update >>> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >>> >>> ???? >>> >>> David, WA7ZYQ >>> >>> C?est la vie, c?est la guerre, viva la salade de pommes de terre. >>> >>> > On Jun 16, 2020, at 7:11 PM, Stephen Adolph <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > I am well into the 2nd build of REXCPM. All of the REXCPM modules are >>> built, untested, but I still need to build the adapters. >>> > So good progress. I'm aiming to ship the next tranch in 2 weeks or >>> sooner. >>> > Steve >>> -------------- next part -------------- >>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >>> URL: <http://lists.bitchin100.com/private.cgi/m100-bitchin100.com >>> /attachments/20200616/84e5c9e2/attachment-0001.html> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> Message: 3 >>> Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 19:52:31 -0700 >>> From: B 9 <[email protected]> >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [M100] Noisy T102 >>> Message-ID: >>> <[email protected] >>> ail.com> >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >>> >>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 11:59 PM Erik van der Tier <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> > It?s the kind of noise where you can hear the processing of the CPU, >>> more >>> > when its busy and it seems to have clear ?structure? to it in relation >>> to >>> > what the T102 is doing. >>> > >>> >>> That's actually kind of cool. >>> >>> But, if you want to get rid of it, maybe double check that you put your >>> electrolytics in with the right polarity. >>> >>> ?b9 >>> -------------- next part -------------- >>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >>> URL: <http://lists.bitchin100.com/private.cgi/m100-bitchin100.com >>> /attachments/20200616/64f85f17/attachment-0001.html> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> Message: 4 >>> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 09:13:58 +0200 >>> From: Erik van der Tier <[email protected]> >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [M100] Noisy T102 >>> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >>> >>> Hehe, yeah, if it couldn?t be a sign of trouble it would definitely be >>> cool ;). I remember that other 80?s computers made these kinds of sounds >>> while processing. I know our Philips P2000T did and later our Amstrad >>> CPC464 as well?. Cheap analog electronics I guess? >>> >>> I did double and triple check the polarity of the caps, so I don?t think >>> that?s the problem. >>> >>> Erik >>> >>> > On 17 Jun 2020, at 04:52, B 9 <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 11:59 PM Erik van der Tier <[email protected] < >>> mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>>> wrote: >>> > It?s the kind of noise where you can hear the processing of the CPU, >>> more when its busy and it seems to have clear ?structure? to it in relation >>> to what the T102 is doing. >>> > >>> > That's actually kind of cool. >>> > >>> > But, if you want to get rid of it, maybe double check that you put >>> your electrolytics in with the right polarity. >>> > >>> > ?b9 >>> >>> -------------- next part -------------- >>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >>> URL: <http://lists.bitchin100.com/private.cgi/m100-bitchin100.com >>> /attachments/20200617/9dbcc183/attachment-0001.html> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> Message: 5 >>> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 09:15:52 +0200 >>> From: Erik van der Tier <[email protected]> >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [M100] Noisy T102 >>> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >>> >>> I have to open it up again, tonight to check on leaking anyway, so I?ll >>> look up the numbers of those caps. I really need to get myself a decent >>> desoldering station, it?s currently taking too much time to desolder these >>> buggers. >>> >>> Erik >>> >>> > On 16 Jun 2020, at 13:31, Stephen Adolph <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> > That's interesting! >>> > Could be that one of the caps you replaced on the +5V line is now >>> microphonic, or the transformer caps. >>> > Which ones did you replace? >>> > It would be interesting to see if you can isolate it. If you had some >>> alternative caps that you could try for the 3 you have changed, you could >>> try changing one at a time. >>> > >>> > >>> > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 2:59 AM Erik van der Tier <[email protected] < >>> mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>>> wrote: >>> > Hi All, >>> > >>> > I?ve had to replace 3 caps on my trusty T102 as they were leaking >>> (nasty as they were fairly recent replacements). The surgery seemed to have >>> worked, except for increase noise. It?s the kind of noise where you can >>> hear the processing of the CPU, more when its busy and it seems to have >>> clear ?structure? to it in relation to what the T102 is doing. >>> > Is this a sign that the same or other caps are not ok? Does anyone >>> have experience with this. I really want to get this capacitor business >>> over with for once and at least a bunch of years (I?m having too much fun >>> with the t102 to let it just die). >>> > Any thoughts on how to fix this? >>> > >>> > Cheers, >>> > Erik >>> >>> -------------- next part -------------- >>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >>> URL: <http://lists.bitchin100.com/private.cgi/m100-bitchin100.com >>> /attachments/20200617/a2a35b3f/attachment-0001.html> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> Message: 6 >>> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 07:54:07 -0400 >>> From: Stephen Adolph <[email protected]> >>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>> Subject: Re: [M100] Noisy T102 >>> Message-ID: >>> <CAMCMnV5qbw3Jgivop_6qnypWqfap1+3TpeHHBH0oKQ_n5SSGGg@mail. >>> gmail.com> >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >>> >>> Heres a tip. For leaded electrolytic caps I "walk" them out by heating >>> one >>> lead and leaning the cap to one side such that the loose lead can slide >>> out >>> a bit. Then I do the same for the other lead, alternating back and forth >>> until it is fully out. >>> >>> On Wednesday, June 17, 2020, Erik van der Tier <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> > I have to open it up again, tonight to check on leaking anyway, so I?ll >>> > look up the numbers of those caps. I really need to get myself a decent >>> > desoldering station, it?s currently taking too much time to desolder >>> these >>> > buggers. >>> > >>> > Erik >>> > >>> > On 16 Jun 2020, at 13:31, Stephen Adolph <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> > That's interesting! >>> > Could be that one of the caps you replaced on the +5V line is now >>> > microphonic, or the transformer caps. >>> > Which ones did you replace? >>> > It would be interesting to see if you can isolate it. If you had some >>> > alternative caps that you could try for the 3 you have changed, you >>> could >>> > try changing one at a time. >>> > >>> > >>> > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 2:59 AM Erik van der Tier <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> >> Hi All, >>> >> >>> >> I?ve had to replace 3 caps on my trusty T102 as they were leaking >>> (nasty >>> >> as they were fairly recent replacements). The surgery seemed to have >>> >> worked, except for increase noise. It?s the kind of noise where you >>> can >>> >> hear the processing of the CPU, more when its busy and it seems to >>> have >>> >> clear ?structure? to it in relation to what the T102 is doing. >>> >> Is this a sign that the same or other caps are not ok? Does anyone >>> have >>> >> experience with this. I really want to get this capacitor business >>> over >>> >> with for once and at least a bunch of years (I?m having too much fun >>> with >>> >> the t102 to let it just die). >>> >> Any thoughts on how to fix this? >>> >> >>> >> Cheers, >>> >> Erik >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -------------- next part -------------- >>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >>> URL: <http://lists.bitchin100.com/private.cgi/m100-bitchin100.com >>> /attachments/20200617/e8d55117/attachment-0001.html> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> Message: 7 >>> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 10:03:53 -0400 >>> From: "Jim Toth" <[email protected]> >>> To: <[email protected]> >>> Subject: Re: [M100] Noisy T102 >>> Message-ID: <9B4F59F15D46480A8F74D285D7462EB0@OWNER27B149584> >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >>> >>> An AM radio near a Model T sounds like that, too. >>> >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: B 9 >>> To: [email protected] >>> Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 10:52 PM >>> Subject: Re: [M100] Noisy T102 >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 11:59 PM Erik van der Tier <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> It?s the kind of noise where you can hear the processing of the CPU, >>> more when its busy and it seems to have clear ?structure? to it in relation >>> to what the T102 is doing. >>> >>> >>> >>> That's actually kind of cool. >>> >>> >>> But, if you want to get rid of it, maybe double check that you put >>> your electrolytics in with the right polarity. >>> >>> >>> >>> ?b9 >>> -------------- next part -------------- >>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >>> URL: <http://lists.bitchin100.com/private.cgi/m100-bitchin100.com >>> /attachments/20200617/91116399/attachment-0001.html> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> Message: 8 >>> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 11:09:40 -0400 >>> From: "Mike Stein" <[email protected]> >>> To: <[email protected]> >>> Subject: Re: [M100] Noisy T102 >>> Message-ID: <625E81B6452F4D1DAC09F88BCACFEA36@310e2> >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >>> >>> Have you tried disconnecting the beeper in case bus noise is leaking >>> across somehow? >>> >>> m >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: Erik van der Tier >>> To: [email protected] >>> Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2020 3:13 AM >>> Subject: Re: [M100] Noisy T102 >>> >>> >>> Hehe, yeah, if it couldn?t be a sign of trouble it would definitely be >>> cool ;). I remember that other 80?s computers made these kinds of sounds >>> while processing. I know our Philips P2000T did and later our Amstrad >>> CPC464 as well?. Cheap analog electronics I guess? >>> >>> >>> I did double and triple check the polarity of the caps, so I don?t >>> think that?s the problem. >>> >>> >>> Erik >>> >>> >>> >>> On 17 Jun 2020, at 04:52, B 9 <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 11:59 PM Erik van der Tier <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> It?s the kind of noise where you can hear the processing of the >>> CPU, more when its busy and it seems to have clear ?structure? to it in >>> relation to what the T102 is doing. >>> >>> >>> >>> That's actually kind of cool. >>> >>> >>> But, if you want to get rid of it, maybe double check that you put >>> your electrolytics in with the right polarity. >>> >>> >>> >>> ?b9 >>> >>> >>> -------------- next part -------------- >>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >>> URL: <http://lists.bitchin100.com/private.cgi/m100-bitchin100.com >>> /attachments/20200617/644dc186/attachment-0001.html> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> Message: 9 >>> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 10:26:59 -0500 >>> From: Bert Put <[email protected]> >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [M100] Rexcpm update >>> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 >>> >>> Thanks Steve, looking forward to getting mine. :-) >>> >>> Cheers, Bert >>> >>> On 6/16/20 9:11 PM, Stephen Adolph wrote: >>> > I am well into the 2nd build of REXCPM.? All of the REXCPM modules are >>> > built, untested, but I still need to build the adapters. >>> > So good progress.? I'm aiming to ship the next tranch in 2 weeks or >>> sooner. >>> > Steve >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> Message: 10 >>> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 11:27:54 -0400 >>> From: "Alex ..." <[email protected]> >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [M100] Noisy T102 >>> Message-ID: >>> <[email protected] >>> ail.com> >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >>> >>> Jim, >>> Just yesterday I was thinking how my T102 would make a good PSK31 >>> terminal, >>> but hearing that I'm not so sure about that idea anymore... >>> ? >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 10:04 AM Jim Toth <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> > An AM radio near a Model T sounds like that, too. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > ----- Original Message ----- >>> > *From:* B 9 <[email protected]> >>> > *To:* [email protected] >>> > *Sent:* Tuesday, June 16, 2020 10:52 PM >>> > *Subject:* Re: [M100] Noisy T102 >>> > >>> > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 11:59 PM Erik van der Tier <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> >> It?s the kind of noise where you can hear the processing of the CPU, >>> more >>> >> when its busy and it seems to have clear ?structure? to it in >>> relation to >>> >> what the T102 is doing. >>> >> >>> > >>> > That's actually kind of cool. >>> > >>> > But, if you want to get rid of it, maybe double check that you put your >>> > electrolytics in with the right polarity. >>> > >>> > ?b9 >>> > >>> > >>> >>> -- >>> Disclaimer: Any resemblance between the above views and those of my >>> employer, my terminal, or the view out my window are purely coincidental. >>> Any resemblance between the above and my own views is non-deterministic. >>> The question of the existence of views in the absence of anyone to hold >>> them is left as an exercise for the reader. >>> The question of the existence of the reader is left as an exercise for >>> the >>> second god coefficient. (A discussion of non-orthogonal, non-integral >>> polytheism is beyond the scope of this article.) Thanks >>> /usr/games/fortune >>> -------------- next part -------------- >>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >>> URL: <http://lists.bitchin100.com/private.cgi/m100-bitchin100.com >>> /attachments/20200617/e65fa286/attachment-0001.html> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> Message: 11 >>> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 17:35:26 +0200 >>> From: Erik van der Tier <[email protected]> >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: [M100] Annotated disassemble of T102 rom >>> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I?m currently well on my way to merge the annotated M100 rom with a >>> disassemble of the T102 rom. This will include documentation of the >>> differences. I hope to create a working .asm file with labels and such that >>> can be reassembled into a functioning Rom (I?m working my way towards a >>> custom os-rom for my 102). >>> >>> If anyone is interested I can put it up on my GitHub account so you can >>> get it. I can imagine this could be interesting for the VirtualT emulator >>> as it provides all the annotations on disassembling the M100 rom but not >>> the T102 currently (except for the RST opcodes). >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Erik >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> Message: 12 >>> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 12:06:00 -0400 >>> From: Stephen Adolph <[email protected]> >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [M100] Annotated disassemble of T102 rom >>> Message-ID: >>> <[email protected] >>> ail.com> >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >>> >>> Hi, it would be great to make this collaborative. I have a lot of my own >>> notes on a disassembly, and I also have a paper disassembly that I >>> acquired >>> a while back. >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 11:35 AM Erik van der Tier <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> > Hi, >>> > >>> > I?m currently well on my way to merge the annotated M100 rom with a >>> > disassemble of the T102 rom. This will include documentation of the >>> > differences. I hope to create a working .asm file with labels and such >>> that >>> > can be reassembled into a functioning Rom (I?m working my way towards a >>> > custom os-rom for my 102). >>> > >>> > If anyone is interested I can put it up on my GitHub account so you can >>> > get it. I can imagine this could be interesting for the VirtualT >>> emulator >>> > as it provides all the annotations on disassembling the M100 rom but >>> not >>> > the T102 currently (except for the RST opcodes). >>> > >>> > Cheers, >>> > Erik >>> -------------- next part -------------- >>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >>> URL: <http://lists.bitchin100.com/private.cgi/m100-bitchin100.com >>> /attachments/20200617/6e646565/attachment-0001.html> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> Message: 13 >>> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 09:10:27 -0700 >>> From: Ken Pettit <[email protected]> >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [M100] Annotated disassemble of T102 rom >>> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed >>> >>> Hi Erik, >>> >>> I presume you are also referencing the additional M100 ROM annotations I >>> did by hand which are not part of the VirtualT standard output (and >>> quite extensive)? >>> >>> Ken >>> >>> On 6/17/20 8:35 AM, Erik van der Tier wrote: >>> > Hi, >>> > >>> > I?m currently well on my way to merge the annotated M100 rom with a >>> disassemble of the T102 rom. This will include documentation of the >>> differences. I hope to create a working .asm file with labels and such that >>> can be reassembled into a functioning Rom (I?m working my way towards a >>> custom os-rom for my 102). >>> > >>> > If anyone is interested I can put it up on my GitHub account so you >>> can get it. I can imagine this could be interesting for the VirtualT >>> emulator as it provides all the annotations on disassembling the M100 rom >>> but not the T102 currently (except for the RST opcodes). >>> > >>> > Cheers, >>> > Erik >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> Message: 14 >>> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 19:21:20 +0200 >>> From: Erik van der Tier <[email protected]> >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [M100] Annotated disassemble of T102 rom >>> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >>> >>> Sounds like a plan, I?m currently doing a first pass getting the routine >>> headercomments in and translating the none sense opcodes into db and dw?s >>> from the m100 dis. I?ll set up a github repo once I?m through this first >>> pass. Next pass will be find and replace on all standard addresses and >>> known rom functions. That way the m100 and t102 should be mostly identical >>> which should help adding the other comments that are available. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Erik >>> >>> > On 17 Jun 2020, at 18:06, Stephen Adolph <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> > ? >>> > Hi, it would be great to make this collaborative. I have a lot of my >>> own notes on a disassembly, and I also have a paper disassembly that I >>> acquired a while back. >>> > >>> > >>> >> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 11:35 AM Erik van der Tier <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >> Hi, >>> >> >>> >> I?m currently well on my way to merge the annotated M100 rom with a >>> disassemble of the T102 rom. This will include documentation of the >>> differences. I hope to create a working .asm file with labels and such that >>> can be reassembled into a functioning Rom (I?m working my way towards a >>> custom os-rom for my 102). >>> >> >>> >> If anyone is interested I can put it up on my GitHub account so you >>> can get it. I can imagine this could be interesting for the VirtualT >>> emulator as it provides all the annotations on disassembling the M100 rom >>> but not the T102 currently (except for the RST opcodes). >>> >> >>> >> Cheers, >>> >> Erik >>> -------------- next part -------------- >>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >>> URL: <http://lists.bitchin100.com/private.cgi/m100-bitchin100.com >>> /attachments/20200617/09e3442f/attachment-0001.html> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> Message: 15 >>> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 19:22:27 +0200 >>> From: Erik van der Tier <[email protected]> >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [M100] Annotated disassemble of T102 rom >>> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 >>> >>> I?m currently merging the standard virtual-t output, but any additional >>> notes and comments would be great to add in! >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Erik >>> >>> > On 17 Jun 2020, at 18:10, Ken Pettit <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> > ?Hi Erik, >>> > >>> > I presume you are also referencing the additional M100 ROM annotations >>> I did by hand which are not part of the VirtualT standard output (and quite >>> extensive)? >>> > >>> > Ken >>> > >>> >> On 6/17/20 8:35 AM, Erik van der Tier wrote: >>> >> Hi, >>> >> >>> >> I?m currently well on my way to merge the annotated M100 rom with a >>> disassemble of the T102 rom. This will include documentation of the >>> differences. I hope to create a working .asm file with labels and such that >>> can be reassembled into a functioning Rom (I?m working my way towards a >>> custom os-rom for my 102). >>> >> >>> >> If anyone is interested I can put it up on my GitHub account so you >>> can get it. I can imagine this could be interesting for the VirtualT >>> emulator as it provides all the annotations on disassembling the M100 rom >>> but not the T102 currently (except for the RST opcodes). >>> >> >>> >> Cheers, >>> >> Erik >>> > >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> Message: 16 >>> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 10:28:38 -0700 >>> From: Ken Pettit <[email protected]> >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [M100] Annotated disassemble of T102 rom >>> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed >>> >>> Erik, >>> >>> I have MANY, MANY more lines commented here: >>> >>> http://www.club100.org/memfiles/index.php?&direction=0&; >>> order=&directory=Ken%20Pettit/M100%20ROM%20Disassembly >>> >>> Ken >>> >>> On 6/17/20 10:22 AM, Erik van der Tier wrote: >>> > I?m currently merging the standard virtual-t output, but any >>> additional notes and comments would be great to add in! >>> > >>> > Cheers, >>> > Erik >>> > >>> >> On 17 Jun 2020, at 18:10, Ken Pettit <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> ?Hi Erik, >>> >> >>> >> I presume you are also referencing the additional M100 ROM >>> annotations I did by hand which are not part of the VirtualT standard >>> output (and quite extensive)? >>> >> >>> >> Ken >>> >> >>> >>> On 6/17/20 8:35 AM, Erik van der Tier wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> >>> >>> I?m currently well on my way to merge the annotated M100 rom with a >>> disassemble of the T102 rom. This will include documentation of the >>> differences. I hope to create a working .asm file with labels and such that >>> can be reassembled into a functioning Rom (I?m working my way towards a >>> custom os-rom for my 102). >>> >>> >>> >>> If anyone is interested I can put it up on my GitHub account so you >>> can get it. I can imagine this could be interesting for the VirtualT >>> emulator as it provides all the annotations on disassembling the M100 rom >>> but not the T102 currently (except for the RST opcodes). >>> >>> >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Erik >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> Message: 17 >>> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 20:31:36 +0000 >>> From: ethan saul <[email protected]> >>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>> Subject: [M100] Tandy 200 Black Screen >>> Message-ID: >>> <[email protected] >>> rprd07.prod.outlook.com> >>> >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Anyone know anything about Tandy 200 black screen of death? I have >>> changed the CMOS battery and tried a cold start using >>> CTRL+SHIFT+BREAK+RESET. >>> When I power it on I hear a click from the speaker and the screen goes >>> black the contrast knob doesn't dim or darken the screen. >>> I have also tried getting it to go into basic and beeping the speaker >>> with no luck. The machine was working before the battery change however the >>> old battery was leaking so I had to change it. >>> There was no corrosion and the battery area was cleaned with Isopropanol. >>> Also the Power button turns the computer off and then back on straight >>> after every time I push it and when there is power from either the >>> battery?s and the ac adapter. >>> Any Ideas what could be the problem? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Ethan >>> -------------- next part -------------- >>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >>> URL: <http://lists.bitchin100.com/private.cgi/m100-bitchin100.com >>> /attachments/20200617/68382e4e/attachment-0001.html> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> Message: 18 >>> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 16:36:00 -0400 >>> From: Stephen Adolph <[email protected]> >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [M100] Tandy 200 Black Screen >>> Message-ID: >>> <[email protected] >>> ail.com> >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >>> >>> Did you double check the polarity of the new battery? >>> If the CMOS battery was flat on install, it will take some time to charge >>> up. >>> It has to be charged or the T200 won't work. >>> ..Steve >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 4:31 PM ethan saul <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> > Hi all, >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > Anyone know anything about Tandy 200 black screen of death? I have >>> changed >>> > the CMOS battery and tried a cold start using CTRL+SHIFT+BREAK+RESET. >>> > >>> > When I power it on I hear a click from the speaker and the screen goes >>> > black the contrast knob doesn't dim or darken the screen. >>> > >>> > I have also tried getting it to go into basic and beeping the speaker >>> with >>> > no luck. The machine was working before the battery change however the >>> old >>> > battery was leaking so I had to change it. >>> > >>> > There was no corrosion and the battery area was cleaned with >>> Isopropanol. >>> > >>> > Also the Power button turns the computer off and then back on straight >>> > after every time I push it and when there is power from either the >>> > battery?s and the ac adapter. >>> > >>> > Any Ideas what could be the problem? >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > Thanks, >>> > >>> > Ethan >>> > >>> -------------- next part -------------- >>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >>> URL: <http://lists.bitchin100.com/private.cgi/m100-bitchin100.com >>> /attachments/20200617/d0bbfdd8/attachment-0001.html> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> Subject: Digest Footer >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> M100 mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.bitchin100.com/listinfo.cgi/m100-bitchin100.com >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> End of M100 Digest, Vol 114, Issue 12 >>> ************************************* >>> >>>
