Ah, perfect, I missed the vt100 driver for the ModelT last time I read that page. Thank you. Option 3 for right now, with my PC and PuTTY playing the role of a vt100 terminal. Hopefully Option 2 at some point.
On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 3:09 PM Stephen Adolph <[email protected]> wrote: > > http://bitchin100.com/wiki/index.php?title=VT100 > > Link to the page.. > Hope that helps. > > Steve > > On Friday, June 19, 2020, Stephen Adolph <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Well what do you want screen 1 to be? >> >> Option 1. A real DVI, with original DVI software >> >> Option 2. Using my hack of the DVI software, and the MVT100 video >> adapter >> >> Option 3. Using my hack of the DVI software plus an rs232 connected >> terminal as the display >> >> I believe i have posted the software at bitchin100. MTV100 adapter is >> still waiting for parts . Hopefully I will have kits soon. >> >> Steve >> >> >> On Friday, June 19, 2020, Dan Higdon <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Where do I get whatever I need to add "screen 1" as a valid command? >>> It occurs to me that I can actually use PuTTY to be my 80x25 display >>> while I'm working my way up to building a vt100 connector. >>> Thanks, >>> Dan >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 10:11 PM Mike Stein <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Welcome to the list and the 'Model T' community! >>>> >>>> As a matter of fact several slightly different external 80x25 video >>>> adapters do exist, although unlike the DVI which connects to the system bus >>>> these connect either to the RS-232 com port or, with a minor board mod, to >>>> the BCR port. >>>> >>>> See >>>> http://bitchin100.com/wiki/index.php?title=File:VT100_1.jpg >>>> >>>> and >>>> http://bitchin100.com/wiki/index.php?title=BCR_TTL_SERIAL_HACK >>>> >>>> for a version adapted to the M100 by Steve Adolph, a list member, >>>> currently awaiting production quantity parts. >>>> >>>> Note that the BCR port mod may be superseded by a different internal >>>> connection. >>>> >>>> m >>>> >>>> ---- Original Message ----- >>>> >>>> *From:* David B <[email protected]> >>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 17, 2020 7:48 PM >>>> *Subject:* [M100] Video out adapter? >>>> >>>> Hi just got a (working!) model 100 off eBay and replaced the nicd >>>> battery. So far, so good. >>>> >>>> Learning about this computer and just read there was a combined >>>> external disk and video adapter. I'm interested in the external video part. >>>> Has anyone designed an external video adapter for this, that can be built >>>> by a hobbyist? >>>> >>>> thanks, >>>> David >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> *From:* M100 <[email protected]> on behalf of >>>> [email protected] <[email protected]> >>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 17, 2020 1:39 PM >>>> *To:* [email protected] <[email protected]> >>>> *Subject:* M100 Digest, Vol 114, Issue 12 >>>> >>>> Send M100 mailing list submissions to >>>> [email protected] >>>> >>>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >>>> http://lists.bitchin100.com/listinfo.cgi/m100-bitchin100.com >>>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >>>> [email protected] >>>> >>>> You can reach the person managing the list at >>>> [email protected] >>>> >>>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >>>> than "Re: Contents of M100 digest..." >>>> >>>> >>>> Today's Topics: >>>> >>>> 1. Rexcpm update (Stephen Adolph) >>>> 2. Re: Rexcpm update (David Rogers) >>>> 3. Re: Noisy T102 (B 9) >>>> 4. Re: Noisy T102 (Erik van der Tier) >>>> 5. Re: Noisy T102 (Erik van der Tier) >>>> 6. Re: Noisy T102 (Stephen Adolph) >>>> 7. Re: Noisy T102 (Jim Toth) >>>> 8. Re: Noisy T102 (Mike Stein) >>>> 9. Re: Rexcpm update (Bert Put) >>>> 10. Re: Noisy T102 (Alex ...) >>>> 11. Annotated disassemble of T102 rom (Erik van der Tier) >>>> 12. Re: Annotated disassemble of T102 rom (Stephen Adolph) >>>> 13. Re: Annotated disassemble of T102 rom (Ken Pettit) >>>> 14. Re: Annotated disassemble of T102 rom (Erik van der Tier) >>>> 15. Re: Annotated disassemble of T102 rom (Erik van der Tier) >>>> 16. Re: Annotated disassemble of T102 rom (Ken Pettit) >>>> 17. Tandy 200 Black Screen (ethan saul) >>>> 18. Re: Tandy 200 Black Screen (Stephen Adolph) >>>> >>>> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >>>> Message: 1 >>>> Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 22:11:30 -0400 >>>> From: Stephen Adolph <[email protected]> >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Subject: [M100] Rexcpm update >>>> Message-ID: >>>> < >>>> camcmnv7xfugfhuq2w+inw9qm77wvuhxzhew+qodgaz2adgz...@mail.gmail.com> >>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >>>> >>>> I am well into the 2nd build of REXCPM. All of the REXCPM modules are >>>> built, untested, but I still need to build the adapters. >>>> So good progress. I'm aiming to ship the next tranch in 2 weeks or >>>> sooner. >>>> Steve >>>> -------------- next part -------------- >>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >>>> URL: < >>>> http://lists.bitchin100.com/private.cgi/m100-bitchin100.com/attachments/20200616/892a2d16/attachment-0001.html >>>> > >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> >>>> Message: 2 >>>> Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 19:43:57 -0700 >>>> From: David Rogers <[email protected]> >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Subject: Re: [M100] Rexcpm update >>>> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >>>> >>>> ???? >>>> >>>> David, WA7ZYQ >>>> >>>> C?est la vie, c?est la guerre, viva la salade de pommes de terre. >>>> >>>> > On Jun 16, 2020, at 7:11 PM, Stephen Adolph <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > I am well into the 2nd build of REXCPM. All of the REXCPM modules >>>> are built, untested, but I still need to build the adapters. >>>> > So good progress. I'm aiming to ship the next tranch in 2 weeks or >>>> sooner. >>>> > Steve >>>> -------------- next part -------------- >>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >>>> URL: < >>>> http://lists.bitchin100.com/private.cgi/m100-bitchin100.com/attachments/20200616/84e5c9e2/attachment-0001.html >>>> > >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> >>>> Message: 3 >>>> Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 19:52:31 -0700 >>>> From: B 9 <[email protected]> >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Subject: Re: [M100] Noisy T102 >>>> Message-ID: >>>> < >>>> cag1tpetpsaurqtuc1dsayoqbdhlsrtnkcbrehfvk7pzuxzr...@mail.gmail.com> >>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 11:59 PM Erik van der Tier <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> > It?s the kind of noise where you can hear the processing of the CPU, >>>> more >>>> > when its busy and it seems to have clear ?structure? to it in >>>> relation to >>>> > what the T102 is doing. >>>> > >>>> >>>> That's actually kind of cool. >>>> >>>> But, if you want to get rid of it, maybe double check that you put your >>>> electrolytics in with the right polarity. >>>> >>>> ?b9 >>>> -------------- next part -------------- >>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >>>> URL: < >>>> http://lists.bitchin100.com/private.cgi/m100-bitchin100.com/attachments/20200616/64f85f17/attachment-0001.html >>>> > >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> >>>> Message: 4 >>>> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 09:13:58 +0200 >>>> From: Erik van der Tier <[email protected]> >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Subject: Re: [M100] Noisy T102 >>>> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >>>> >>>> Hehe, yeah, if it couldn?t be a sign of trouble it would definitely be >>>> cool ;). I remember that other 80?s computers made these kinds of sounds >>>> while processing. I know our Philips P2000T did and later our Amstrad >>>> CPC464 as well?. Cheap analog electronics I guess? >>>> >>>> I did double and triple check the polarity of the caps, so I don?t >>>> think that?s the problem. >>>> >>>> Erik >>>> >>>> > On 17 Jun 2020, at 04:52, B 9 <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 11:59 PM Erik van der Tier <[email protected] < >>>> mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>>> wrote: >>>> > It?s the kind of noise where you can hear the processing of the CPU, >>>> more when its busy and it seems to have clear ?structure? to it in relation >>>> to what the T102 is doing. >>>> > >>>> > That's actually kind of cool. >>>> > >>>> > But, if you want to get rid of it, maybe double check that you put >>>> your electrolytics in with the right polarity. >>>> > >>>> > ?b9 >>>> >>>> -------------- next part -------------- >>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >>>> URL: < >>>> http://lists.bitchin100.com/private.cgi/m100-bitchin100.com/attachments/20200617/9dbcc183/attachment-0001.html >>>> > >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> >>>> Message: 5 >>>> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 09:15:52 +0200 >>>> From: Erik van der Tier <[email protected]> >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Subject: Re: [M100] Noisy T102 >>>> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >>>> >>>> I have to open it up again, tonight to check on leaking anyway, so I?ll >>>> look up the numbers of those caps. I really need to get myself a decent >>>> desoldering station, it?s currently taking too much time to desolder these >>>> buggers. >>>> >>>> Erik >>>> >>>> > On 16 Jun 2020, at 13:31, Stephen Adolph <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > That's interesting! >>>> > Could be that one of the caps you replaced on the +5V line is now >>>> microphonic, or the transformer caps. >>>> > Which ones did you replace? >>>> > It would be interesting to see if you can isolate it. If you had >>>> some alternative caps that you could try for the 3 you have changed, you >>>> could try changing one at a time. >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 2:59 AM Erik van der Tier <[email protected] < >>>> mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>>> wrote: >>>> > Hi All, >>>> > >>>> > I?ve had to replace 3 caps on my trusty T102 as they were leaking >>>> (nasty as they were fairly recent replacements). The surgery seemed to have >>>> worked, except for increase noise. It?s the kind of noise where you can >>>> hear the processing of the CPU, more when its busy and it seems to have >>>> clear ?structure? to it in relation to what the T102 is doing. >>>> > Is this a sign that the same or other caps are not ok? Does anyone >>>> have experience with this. I really want to get this capacitor business >>>> over with for once and at least a bunch of years (I?m having too much fun >>>> with the t102 to let it just die). >>>> > Any thoughts on how to fix this? >>>> > >>>> > Cheers, >>>> > Erik >>>> >>>> -------------- next part -------------- >>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >>>> URL: < >>>> http://lists.bitchin100.com/private.cgi/m100-bitchin100.com/attachments/20200617/a2a35b3f/attachment-0001.html >>>> > >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> >>>> Message: 6 >>>> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 07:54:07 -0400 >>>> From: Stephen Adolph <[email protected]> >>>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>>> Subject: Re: [M100] Noisy T102 >>>> Message-ID: >>>> < >>>> camcmnv5qbw3jgivop_6qnypwqfap1+3tpehhbh0okq_n5ss...@mail.gmail.com> >>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >>>> >>>> Heres a tip. For leaded electrolytic caps I "walk" them out by heating >>>> one >>>> lead and leaning the cap to one side such that the loose lead can slide >>>> out >>>> a bit. Then I do the same for the other lead, alternating back and >>>> forth >>>> until it is fully out. >>>> >>>> On Wednesday, June 17, 2020, Erik van der Tier <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> > I have to open it up again, tonight to check on leaking anyway, so >>>> I?ll >>>> > look up the numbers of those caps. I really need to get myself a >>>> decent >>>> > desoldering station, it?s currently taking too much time to desolder >>>> these >>>> > buggers. >>>> > >>>> > Erik >>>> > >>>> > On 16 Jun 2020, at 13:31, Stephen Adolph <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > That's interesting! >>>> > Could be that one of the caps you replaced on the +5V line is now >>>> > microphonic, or the transformer caps. >>>> > Which ones did you replace? >>>> > It would be interesting to see if you can isolate it. If you had some >>>> > alternative caps that you could try for the 3 you have changed, you >>>> could >>>> > try changing one at a time. >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 2:59 AM Erik van der Tier <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> > >>>> >> Hi All, >>>> >> >>>> >> I?ve had to replace 3 caps on my trusty T102 as they were leaking >>>> (nasty >>>> >> as they were fairly recent replacements). The surgery seemed to have >>>> >> worked, except for increase noise. It?s the kind of noise where you >>>> can >>>> >> hear the processing of the CPU, more when its busy and it seems to >>>> have >>>> >> clear ?structure? to it in relation to what the T102 is doing. >>>> >> Is this a sign that the same or other caps are not ok? Does anyone >>>> have >>>> >> experience with this. I really want to get this capacitor business >>>> over >>>> >> with for once and at least a bunch of years (I?m having too much fun >>>> with >>>> >> the t102 to let it just die). >>>> >> Any thoughts on how to fix this? >>>> >> >>>> >> Cheers, >>>> >> Erik >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -------------- next part -------------- >>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >>>> URL: < >>>> http://lists.bitchin100.com/private.cgi/m100-bitchin100.com/attachments/20200617/e8d55117/attachment-0001.html >>>> > >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> >>>> Message: 7 >>>> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 10:03:53 -0400 >>>> From: "Jim Toth" <[email protected]> >>>> To: <[email protected]> >>>> Subject: Re: [M100] Noisy T102 >>>> Message-ID: <9B4F59F15D46480A8F74D285D7462EB0@OWNER27B149584> >>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >>>> >>>> An AM radio near a Model T sounds like that, too. >>>> >>>> >>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>> From: B 9 >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 10:52 PM >>>> Subject: Re: [M100] Noisy T102 >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 11:59 PM Erik van der Tier <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> It?s the kind of noise where you can hear the processing of the >>>> CPU, more when its busy and it seems to have clear ?structure? to it in >>>> relation to what the T102 is doing. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> That's actually kind of cool. >>>> >>>> >>>> But, if you want to get rid of it, maybe double check that you put >>>> your electrolytics in with the right polarity. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ?b9 >>>> -------------- next part -------------- >>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >>>> URL: < >>>> http://lists.bitchin100.com/private.cgi/m100-bitchin100.com/attachments/20200617/91116399/attachment-0001.html >>>> > >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> >>>> Message: 8 >>>> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 11:09:40 -0400 >>>> From: "Mike Stein" <[email protected]> >>>> To: <[email protected]> >>>> Subject: Re: [M100] Noisy T102 >>>> Message-ID: <625E81B6452F4D1DAC09F88BCACFEA36@310e2> >>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >>>> >>>> Have you tried disconnecting the beeper in case bus noise is leaking >>>> across somehow? >>>> >>>> m >>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>> From: Erik van der Tier >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2020 3:13 AM >>>> Subject: Re: [M100] Noisy T102 >>>> >>>> >>>> Hehe, yeah, if it couldn?t be a sign of trouble it would definitely >>>> be cool ;). I remember that other 80?s computers made these kinds of sounds >>>> while processing. I know our Philips P2000T did and later our Amstrad >>>> CPC464 as well?. Cheap analog electronics I guess? >>>> >>>> >>>> I did double and triple check the polarity of the caps, so I don?t >>>> think that?s the problem. >>>> >>>> >>>> Erik >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 17 Jun 2020, at 04:52, B 9 <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 11:59 PM Erik van der Tier <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> It?s the kind of noise where you can hear the processing of the >>>> CPU, more when its busy and it seems to have clear ?structure? to it in >>>> relation to what the T102 is doing. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> That's actually kind of cool. >>>> >>>> >>>> But, if you want to get rid of it, maybe double check that you put >>>> your electrolytics in with the right polarity. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ?b9 >>>> >>>> >>>> -------------- next part -------------- >>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >>>> URL: < >>>> http://lists.bitchin100.com/private.cgi/m100-bitchin100.com/attachments/20200617/644dc186/attachment-0001.html >>>> > >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> >>>> Message: 9 >>>> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 10:26:59 -0500 >>>> From: Bert Put <[email protected]> >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Subject: Re: [M100] Rexcpm update >>>> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 >>>> >>>> Thanks Steve, looking forward to getting mine. :-) >>>> >>>> Cheers, Bert >>>> >>>> On 6/16/20 9:11 PM, Stephen Adolph wrote: >>>> > I am well into the 2nd build of REXCPM.? All of the REXCPM modules are >>>> > built, untested, but I still need to build the adapters. >>>> > So good progress.? I'm aiming to ship the next tranch in 2 weeks or >>>> sooner. >>>> > Steve >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> >>>> Message: 10 >>>> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 11:27:54 -0400 >>>> From: "Alex ..." <[email protected]> >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Subject: Re: [M100] Noisy T102 >>>> Message-ID: >>>> < >>>> cadb9qzm5sovvntfouqakcdjt6iuws+3kpijfyki0n7-5fun...@mail.gmail.com> >>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >>>> >>>> Jim, >>>> Just yesterday I was thinking how my T102 would make a good PSK31 >>>> terminal, >>>> but hearing that I'm not so sure about that idea anymore... >>>> ? >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 10:04 AM Jim Toth <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> > An AM radio near a Model T sounds like that, too. >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > ----- Original Message ----- >>>> > *From:* B 9 <[email protected]> >>>> > *To:* [email protected] >>>> > *Sent:* Tuesday, June 16, 2020 10:52 PM >>>> > *Subject:* Re: [M100] Noisy T102 >>>> > >>>> > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 11:59 PM Erik van der Tier <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> > >>>> >> It?s the kind of noise where you can hear the processing of the CPU, >>>> more >>>> >> when its busy and it seems to have clear ?structure? to it in >>>> relation to >>>> >> what the T102 is doing. >>>> >> >>>> > >>>> > That's actually kind of cool. >>>> > >>>> > But, if you want to get rid of it, maybe double check that you put >>>> your >>>> > electrolytics in with the right polarity. >>>> > >>>> > ?b9 >>>> > >>>> > >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Disclaimer: Any resemblance between the above views and those of my >>>> employer, my terminal, or the view out my window are purely >>>> coincidental. >>>> Any resemblance between the above and my own views is non-deterministic. >>>> The question of the existence of views in the absence of anyone to hold >>>> them is left as an exercise for the reader. >>>> The question of the existence of the reader is left as an exercise for >>>> the >>>> second god coefficient. (A discussion of non-orthogonal, non-integral >>>> polytheism is beyond the scope of this article.) Thanks >>>> /usr/games/fortune >>>> -------------- next part -------------- >>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >>>> URL: < >>>> http://lists.bitchin100.com/private.cgi/m100-bitchin100.com/attachments/20200617/e65fa286/attachment-0001.html >>>> > >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> >>>> Message: 11 >>>> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 17:35:26 +0200 >>>> From: Erik van der Tier <[email protected]> >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Subject: [M100] Annotated disassemble of T102 rom >>>> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I?m currently well on my way to merge the annotated M100 rom with a >>>> disassemble of the T102 rom. This will include documentation of the >>>> differences. I hope to create a working .asm file with labels and such that >>>> can be reassembled into a functioning Rom (I?m working my way towards a >>>> custom os-rom for my 102). >>>> >>>> If anyone is interested I can put it up on my GitHub account so you can >>>> get it. I can imagine this could be interesting for the VirtualT emulator >>>> as it provides all the annotations on disassembling the M100 rom but not >>>> the T102 currently (except for the RST opcodes). >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Erik >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> >>>> Message: 12 >>>> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 12:06:00 -0400 >>>> From: Stephen Adolph <[email protected]> >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Subject: Re: [M100] Annotated disassemble of T102 rom >>>> Message-ID: >>>> < >>>> camcmnv6btu6x6vox9h33boxbuymebu4frg7_p7dbwxbml97...@mail.gmail.com> >>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >>>> >>>> Hi, it would be great to make this collaborative. I have a lot of my own >>>> notes on a disassembly, and I also have a paper disassembly that I >>>> acquired >>>> a while back. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 11:35 AM Erik van der Tier <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> > Hi, >>>> > >>>> > I?m currently well on my way to merge the annotated M100 rom with a >>>> > disassemble of the T102 rom. This will include documentation of the >>>> > differences. I hope to create a working .asm file with labels and >>>> such that >>>> > can be reassembled into a functioning Rom (I?m working my way towards >>>> a >>>> > custom os-rom for my 102). >>>> > >>>> > If anyone is interested I can put it up on my GitHub account so you >>>> can >>>> > get it. I can imagine this could be interesting for the VirtualT >>>> emulator >>>> > as it provides all the annotations on disassembling the M100 rom but >>>> not >>>> > the T102 currently (except for the RST opcodes). >>>> > >>>> > Cheers, >>>> > Erik >>>> -------------- next part -------------- >>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >>>> URL: < >>>> http://lists.bitchin100.com/private.cgi/m100-bitchin100.com/attachments/20200617/6e646565/attachment-0001.html >>>> > >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> >>>> Message: 13 >>>> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 09:10:27 -0700 >>>> From: Ken Pettit <[email protected]> >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Subject: Re: [M100] Annotated disassemble of T102 rom >>>> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed >>>> >>>> Hi Erik, >>>> >>>> I presume you are also referencing the additional M100 ROM annotations >>>> I >>>> did by hand which are not part of the VirtualT standard output (and >>>> quite extensive)? >>>> >>>> Ken >>>> >>>> On 6/17/20 8:35 AM, Erik van der Tier wrote: >>>> > Hi, >>>> > >>>> > I?m currently well on my way to merge the annotated M100 rom with a >>>> disassemble of the T102 rom. This will include documentation of the >>>> differences. I hope to create a working .asm file with labels and such that >>>> can be reassembled into a functioning Rom (I?m working my way towards a >>>> custom os-rom for my 102). >>>> > >>>> > If anyone is interested I can put it up on my GitHub account so you >>>> can get it. I can imagine this could be interesting for the VirtualT >>>> emulator as it provides all the annotations on disassembling the M100 rom >>>> but not the T102 currently (except for the RST opcodes). >>>> > >>>> > Cheers, >>>> > Erik >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> >>>> Message: 14 >>>> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 19:21:20 +0200 >>>> From: Erik van der Tier <[email protected]> >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Subject: Re: [M100] Annotated disassemble of T102 rom >>>> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >>>> >>>> Sounds like a plan, I?m currently doing a first pass getting the >>>> routine headercomments in and translating the none sense opcodes into db >>>> and dw?s from the m100 dis. I?ll set up a github repo once I?m through this >>>> first pass. Next pass will be find and replace on all standard addresses >>>> and known rom functions. That way the m100 and t102 should be mostly >>>> identical which should help adding the other comments that are available. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Erik >>>> >>>> > On 17 Jun 2020, at 18:06, Stephen Adolph <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > ? >>>> > Hi, it would be great to make this collaborative. I have a lot of my >>>> own notes on a disassembly, and I also have a paper disassembly that I >>>> acquired a while back. >>>> > >>>> > >>>> >> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 11:35 AM Erik van der Tier <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >> Hi, >>>> >> >>>> >> I?m currently well on my way to merge the annotated M100 rom with a >>>> disassemble of the T102 rom. This will include documentation of the >>>> differences. I hope to create a working .asm file with labels and such that >>>> can be reassembled into a functioning Rom (I?m working my way towards a >>>> custom os-rom for my 102). >>>> >> >>>> >> If anyone is interested I can put it up on my GitHub account so you >>>> can get it. I can imagine this could be interesting for the VirtualT >>>> emulator as it provides all the annotations on disassembling the M100 rom >>>> but not the T102 currently (except for the RST opcodes). >>>> >> >>>> >> Cheers, >>>> >> Erik >>>> -------------- next part -------------- >>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >>>> URL: < >>>> http://lists.bitchin100.com/private.cgi/m100-bitchin100.com/attachments/20200617/09e3442f/attachment-0001.html >>>> > >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> >>>> Message: 15 >>>> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 19:22:27 +0200 >>>> From: Erik van der Tier <[email protected]> >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Subject: Re: [M100] Annotated disassemble of T102 rom >>>> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 >>>> >>>> I?m currently merging the standard virtual-t output, but any additional >>>> notes and comments would be great to add in! >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Erik >>>> >>>> > On 17 Jun 2020, at 18:10, Ken Pettit <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > ?Hi Erik, >>>> > >>>> > I presume you are also referencing the additional M100 ROM >>>> annotations I did by hand which are not part of the VirtualT standard >>>> output (and quite extensive)? >>>> > >>>> > Ken >>>> > >>>> >> On 6/17/20 8:35 AM, Erik van der Tier wrote: >>>> >> Hi, >>>> >> >>>> >> I?m currently well on my way to merge the annotated M100 rom with a >>>> disassemble of the T102 rom. This will include documentation of the >>>> differences. I hope to create a working .asm file with labels and such that >>>> can be reassembled into a functioning Rom (I?m working my way towards a >>>> custom os-rom for my 102). >>>> >> >>>> >> If anyone is interested I can put it up on my GitHub account so you >>>> can get it. I can imagine this could be interesting for the VirtualT >>>> emulator as it provides all the annotations on disassembling the M100 rom >>>> but not the T102 currently (except for the RST opcodes). >>>> >> >>>> >> Cheers, >>>> >> Erik >>>> > >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> >>>> Message: 16 >>>> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 10:28:38 -0700 >>>> From: Ken Pettit <[email protected]> >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Subject: Re: [M100] Annotated disassemble of T102 rom >>>> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed >>>> >>>> Erik, >>>> >>>> I have MANY, MANY more lines commented here: >>>> >>>> >>>> http://www.club100.org/memfiles/index.php?&direction=0&order=&directory=Ken%20Pettit/M100%20ROM%20Disassembly >>>> >>>> Ken >>>> >>>> On 6/17/20 10:22 AM, Erik van der Tier wrote: >>>> > I?m currently merging the standard virtual-t output, but any >>>> additional notes and comments would be great to add in! >>>> > >>>> > Cheers, >>>> > Erik >>>> > >>>> >> On 17 Jun 2020, at 18:10, Ken Pettit <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >> ?Hi Erik, >>>> >> >>>> >> I presume you are also referencing the additional M100 ROM >>>> annotations I did by hand which are not part of the VirtualT standard >>>> output (and quite extensive)? >>>> >> >>>> >> Ken >>>> >> >>>> >>> On 6/17/20 8:35 AM, Erik van der Tier wrote: >>>> >>> Hi, >>>> >>> >>>> >>> I?m currently well on my way to merge the annotated M100 rom with a >>>> disassemble of the T102 rom. This will include documentation of the >>>> differences. I hope to create a working .asm file with labels and such that >>>> can be reassembled into a functioning Rom (I?m working my way towards a >>>> custom os-rom for my 102). >>>> >>> >>>> >>> If anyone is interested I can put it up on my GitHub account so you >>>> can get it. I can imagine this could be interesting for the VirtualT >>>> emulator as it provides all the annotations on disassembling the M100 rom >>>> but not the T102 currently (except for the RST opcodes). >>>> >>> >>>> >>> Cheers, >>>> >>> Erik >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> >>>> Message: 17 >>>> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 20:31:36 +0000 >>>> From: ethan saul <[email protected]> >>>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>>> Subject: [M100] Tandy 200 Black Screen >>>> Message-ID: >>>> < >>>> vi1pr0701mb6768e80573a4c2b02837210a8f...@vi1pr0701mb6768.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com >>>> > >>>> >>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" >>>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> Anyone know anything about Tandy 200 black screen of death? I have >>>> changed the CMOS battery and tried a cold start using >>>> CTRL+SHIFT+BREAK+RESET. >>>> When I power it on I hear a click from the speaker and the screen goes >>>> black the contrast knob doesn't dim or darken the screen. >>>> I have also tried getting it to go into basic and beeping the speaker >>>> with no luck. The machine was working before the battery change however the >>>> old battery was leaking so I had to change it. >>>> There was no corrosion and the battery area was cleaned with >>>> Isopropanol. >>>> Also the Power button turns the computer off and then back on straight >>>> after every time I push it and when there is power from either the >>>> battery?s and the ac adapter. >>>> Any Ideas what could be the problem? >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Ethan >>>> -------------- next part -------------- >>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >>>> URL: < >>>> http://lists.bitchin100.com/private.cgi/m100-bitchin100.com/attachments/20200617/68382e4e/attachment-0001.html >>>> > >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> >>>> Message: 18 >>>> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 16:36:00 -0400 >>>> From: Stephen Adolph <[email protected]> >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Subject: Re: [M100] Tandy 200 Black Screen >>>> Message-ID: >>>> <CAMCMnV7cK2=LMb2O1ccb= >>>> [email protected]> >>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >>>> >>>> Did you double check the polarity of the new battery? >>>> If the CMOS battery was flat on install, it will take some time to >>>> charge >>>> up. >>>> It has to be charged or the T200 won't work. >>>> ..Steve >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 4:31 PM ethan saul <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> > Hi all, >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > Anyone know anything about Tandy 200 black screen of death? I have >>>> changed >>>> > the CMOS battery and tried a cold start using CTRL+SHIFT+BREAK+RESET. >>>> > >>>> > When I power it on I hear a click from the speaker and the screen goes >>>> > black the contrast knob doesn't dim or darken the screen. >>>> > >>>> > I have also tried getting it to go into basic and beeping the speaker >>>> with >>>> > no luck. The machine was working before the battery change however >>>> the old >>>> > battery was leaking so I had to change it. >>>> > >>>> > There was no corrosion and the battery area was cleaned with >>>> Isopropanol. >>>> > >>>> > Also the Power button turns the computer off and then back on straight >>>> > after every time I push it and when there is power from either the >>>> > battery?s and the ac adapter. >>>> > >>>> > Any Ideas what could be the problem? >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > Thanks, >>>> > >>>> > Ethan >>>> > >>>> -------------- next part -------------- >>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >>>> URL: < >>>> http://lists.bitchin100.com/private.cgi/m100-bitchin100.com/attachments/20200617/d0bbfdd8/attachment-0001.html >>>> > >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> >>>> Subject: Digest Footer >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> M100 mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://lists.bitchin100.com/listinfo.cgi/m100-bitchin100.com >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> >>>> End of M100 Digest, Vol 114, Issue 12 >>>> ************************************* >>>> >>>>
