Give it a try! Note that a normal vt100 does ot work perfectly. As I say in the wiki page, a vt100 does not have certain commands that the model T needs.
On Friday, June 19, 2020, Dan Higdon <[email protected]> wrote: > Ah, perfect, I missed the vt100 driver for the ModelT last time I read > that page. Thank you. > Option 3 for right now, with my PC and PuTTY playing the role of a vt100 > terminal. > Hopefully Option 2 at some point. > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 3:09 PM Stephen Adolph <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >> http://bitchin100.com/wiki/index.php?title=VT100 >> >> Link to the page.. >> Hope that helps. >> >> Steve >> >> On Friday, June 19, 2020, Stephen Adolph <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Well what do you want screen 1 to be? >>> >>> Option 1. A real DVI, with original DVI software >>> >>> Option 2. Using my hack of the DVI software, and the MVT100 video >>> adapter >>> >>> Option 3. Using my hack of the DVI software plus an rs232 connected >>> terminal as the display >>> >>> I believe i have posted the software at bitchin100. MTV100 adapter is >>> still waiting for parts . Hopefully I will have kits soon. >>> >>> Steve >>> >>> >>> On Friday, June 19, 2020, Dan Higdon <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Where do I get whatever I need to add "screen 1" as a valid command? >>>> It occurs to me that I can actually use PuTTY to be my 80x25 display >>>> while I'm working my way up to building a vt100 connector. >>>> Thanks, >>>> Dan >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 10:11 PM Mike Stein <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Welcome to the list and the 'Model T' community! >>>>> >>>>> As a matter of fact several slightly different external 80x25 video >>>>> adapters do exist, although unlike the DVI which connects to the system >>>>> bus >>>>> these connect either to the RS-232 com port or, with a minor board mod, to >>>>> the BCR port. >>>>> >>>>> See >>>>> http://bitchin100.com/wiki/index.php?title=File:VT100_1.jpg >>>>> >>>>> and >>>>> http://bitchin100.com/wiki/index.php?title=BCR_TTL_SERIAL_HACK >>>>> >>>>> for a version adapted to the M100 by Steve Adolph, a list member, >>>>> currently awaiting production quantity parts. >>>>> >>>>> Note that the BCR port mod may be superseded by a different internal >>>>> connection. >>>>> >>>>> m >>>>> >>>>> ---- Original Message ----- >>>>> >>>>> *From:* David B <[email protected]> >>>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 17, 2020 7:48 PM >>>>> *Subject:* [M100] Video out adapter? >>>>> >>>>> Hi just got a (working!) model 100 off eBay and replaced the nicd >>>>> battery. So far, so good. >>>>> >>>>> Learning about this computer and just read there was a combined >>>>> external disk and video adapter. I'm interested in the external video >>>>> part. >>>>> Has anyone designed an external video adapter for this, that can be built >>>>> by a hobbyist? >>>>> >>>>> thanks, >>>>> David >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>> *From:* M100 <[email protected]> on behalf of >>>>> [email protected] <[email protected]> >>>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 17, 2020 1:39 PM >>>>> *To:* [email protected] <[email protected]> >>>>> *Subject:* M100 Digest, Vol 114, Issue 12 >>>>> >>>>> Send M100 mailing list submissions to >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> >>>>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >>>>> http://lists.bitchin100.com/listinfo.cgi/m100-bitchin100.com >>>>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> >>>>> You can reach the person managing the list at >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> >>>>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >>>>> than "Re: Contents of M100 digest..." >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Today's Topics: >>>>> >>>>> 1. Rexcpm update (Stephen Adolph) >>>>> 2. Re: Rexcpm update (David Rogers) >>>>> 3. Re: Noisy T102 (B 9) >>>>> 4. Re: Noisy T102 (Erik van der Tier) >>>>> 5. Re: Noisy T102 (Erik van der Tier) >>>>> 6. Re: Noisy T102 (Stephen Adolph) >>>>> 7. Re: Noisy T102 (Jim Toth) >>>>> 8. Re: Noisy T102 (Mike Stein) >>>>> 9. Re: Rexcpm update (Bert Put) >>>>> 10. Re: Noisy T102 (Alex ...) >>>>> 11. Annotated disassemble of T102 rom (Erik van der Tier) >>>>> 12. Re: Annotated disassemble of T102 rom (Stephen Adolph) >>>>> 13. Re: Annotated disassemble of T102 rom (Ken Pettit) >>>>> 14. Re: Annotated disassemble of T102 rom (Erik van der Tier) >>>>> 15. Re: Annotated disassemble of T102 rom (Erik van der Tier) >>>>> 16. Re: Annotated disassemble of T102 rom (Ken Pettit) >>>>> 17. Tandy 200 Black Screen (ethan saul) >>>>> 18. Re: Tandy 200 Black Screen (Stephen Adolph) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> >>>>> Message: 1 >>>>> Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 22:11:30 -0400 >>>>> From: Stephen Adolph <[email protected]> >>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>> Subject: [M100] Rexcpm update >>>>> Message-ID: >>>>> <CAMCMnV7XfUGfhuq2w+iNW9Qm77wVUhXzHew+ >>>>> [email protected]> >>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >>>>> >>>>> I am well into the 2nd build of REXCPM. All of the REXCPM modules are >>>>> built, untested, but I still need to build the adapters. >>>>> So good progress. I'm aiming to ship the next tranch in 2 weeks or >>>>> sooner. >>>>> Steve >>>>> -------------- next part -------------- >>>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >>>>> URL: <http://lists.bitchin100.com/private.cgi/m100-bitchin100. >>>>> com/attachments/20200616/892a2d16/attachment-0001.html> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>> >>>>> Message: 2 >>>>> Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 19:43:57 -0700 >>>>> From: David Rogers <[email protected]> >>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>> Subject: Re: [M100] Rexcpm update >>>>> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >>>>> >>>>> ???? >>>>> >>>>> David, WA7ZYQ >>>>> >>>>> C?est la vie, c?est la guerre, viva la salade de pommes de terre. >>>>> >>>>> > On Jun 16, 2020, at 7:11 PM, Stephen Adolph <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > I am well into the 2nd build of REXCPM. All of the REXCPM modules >>>>> are built, untested, but I still need to build the adapters. >>>>> > So good progress. I'm aiming to ship the next tranch in 2 weeks or >>>>> sooner. >>>>> > Steve >>>>> -------------- next part -------------- >>>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >>>>> URL: <http://lists.bitchin100.com/private.cgi/m100-bitchin100. >>>>> com/attachments/20200616/84e5c9e2/attachment-0001.html> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>> >>>>> Message: 3 >>>>> Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 19:52:31 -0700 >>>>> From: B 9 <[email protected]> >>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>> Subject: Re: [M100] Noisy T102 >>>>> Message-ID: >>>>> <CAG1tPetPsAurQtuc1dSaYoQBdhLSrTnKCBREhfVk7PzUxZrh2A@mail. >>>>> gmail.com> >>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 11:59 PM Erik van der Tier <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> > It?s the kind of noise where you can hear the processing of the CPU, >>>>> more >>>>> > when its busy and it seems to have clear ?structure? to it in >>>>> relation to >>>>> > what the T102 is doing. >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> That's actually kind of cool. >>>>> >>>>> But, if you want to get rid of it, maybe double check that you put your >>>>> electrolytics in with the right polarity. >>>>> >>>>> ?b9 >>>>> -------------- next part -------------- >>>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >>>>> URL: <http://lists.bitchin100.com/private.cgi/m100-bitchin100. >>>>> com/attachments/20200616/64f85f17/attachment-0001.html> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>> >>>>> Message: 4 >>>>> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 09:13:58 +0200 >>>>> From: Erik van der Tier <[email protected]> >>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>> Subject: Re: [M100] Noisy T102 >>>>> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >>>>> >>>>> Hehe, yeah, if it couldn?t be a sign of trouble it would definitely be >>>>> cool ;). I remember that other 80?s computers made these kinds of sounds >>>>> while processing. I know our Philips P2000T did and later our Amstrad >>>>> CPC464 as well?. Cheap analog electronics I guess? >>>>> >>>>> I did double and triple check the polarity of the caps, so I don?t >>>>> think that?s the problem. >>>>> >>>>> Erik >>>>> >>>>> > On 17 Jun 2020, at 04:52, B 9 <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 11:59 PM Erik van der Tier <[email protected] < >>>>> mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>>> wrote: >>>>> > It?s the kind of noise where you can hear the processing of the CPU, >>>>> more when its busy and it seems to have clear ?structure? to it in >>>>> relation >>>>> to what the T102 is doing. >>>>> > >>>>> > That's actually kind of cool. >>>>> > >>>>> > But, if you want to get rid of it, maybe double check that you put >>>>> your electrolytics in with the right polarity. >>>>> > >>>>> > ?b9 >>>>> >>>>> -------------- next part -------------- >>>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >>>>> URL: <http://lists.bitchin100.com/private.cgi/m100-bitchin100. >>>>> com/attachments/20200617/9dbcc183/attachment-0001.html> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>> >>>>> Message: 5 >>>>> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 09:15:52 +0200 >>>>> From: Erik van der Tier <[email protected]> >>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>> Subject: Re: [M100] Noisy T102 >>>>> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >>>>> >>>>> I have to open it up again, tonight to check on leaking anyway, so >>>>> I?ll look up the numbers of those caps. I really need to get myself a >>>>> decent desoldering station, it?s currently taking too much time to >>>>> desolder >>>>> these buggers. >>>>> >>>>> Erik >>>>> >>>>> > On 16 Jun 2020, at 13:31, Stephen Adolph <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > That's interesting! >>>>> > Could be that one of the caps you replaced on the +5V line is now >>>>> microphonic, or the transformer caps. >>>>> > Which ones did you replace? >>>>> > It would be interesting to see if you can isolate it. If you had >>>>> some alternative caps that you could try for the 3 you have changed, you >>>>> could try changing one at a time. >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 2:59 AM Erik van der Tier <[email protected] < >>>>> mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>>> wrote: >>>>> > Hi All, >>>>> > >>>>> > I?ve had to replace 3 caps on my trusty T102 as they were leaking >>>>> (nasty as they were fairly recent replacements). The surgery seemed to >>>>> have >>>>> worked, except for increase noise. It?s the kind of noise where you can >>>>> hear the processing of the CPU, more when its busy and it seems to have >>>>> clear ?structure? to it in relation to what the T102 is doing. >>>>> > Is this a sign that the same or other caps are not ok? Does anyone >>>>> have experience with this. I really want to get this capacitor business >>>>> over with for once and at least a bunch of years (I?m having too much fun >>>>> with the t102 to let it just die). >>>>> > Any thoughts on how to fix this? >>>>> > >>>>> > Cheers, >>>>> > Erik >>>>> >>>>> -------------- next part -------------- >>>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >>>>> URL: <http://lists.bitchin100.com/private.cgi/m100-bitchin100. >>>>> com/attachments/20200617/a2a35b3f/attachment-0001.html> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>> >>>>> Message: 6 >>>>> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 07:54:07 -0400 >>>>> From: Stephen Adolph <[email protected]> >>>>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>>>> Subject: Re: [M100] Noisy T102 >>>>> Message-ID: >>>>> <CAMCMnV5qbw3Jgivop_6qnypWqfap1+3TpeHHBH0oKQ_ >>>>> [email protected]> >>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >>>>> >>>>> Heres a tip. For leaded electrolytic caps I "walk" them out by heating >>>>> one >>>>> lead and leaning the cap to one side such that the loose lead can >>>>> slide out >>>>> a bit. Then I do the same for the other lead, alternating back and >>>>> forth >>>>> until it is fully out. >>>>> >>>>> On Wednesday, June 17, 2020, Erik van der Tier <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> > I have to open it up again, tonight to check on leaking anyway, so >>>>> I?ll >>>>> > look up the numbers of those caps. I really need to get myself a >>>>> decent >>>>> > desoldering station, it?s currently taking too much time to desolder >>>>> these >>>>> > buggers. >>>>> > >>>>> > Erik >>>>> > >>>>> > On 16 Jun 2020, at 13:31, Stephen Adolph <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > That's interesting! >>>>> > Could be that one of the caps you replaced on the +5V line is now >>>>> > microphonic, or the transformer caps. >>>>> > Which ones did you replace? >>>>> > It would be interesting to see if you can isolate it. If you had >>>>> some >>>>> > alternative caps that you could try for the 3 you have changed, you >>>>> could >>>>> > try changing one at a time. >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 2:59 AM Erik van der Tier <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> >> Hi All, >>>>> >> >>>>> >> I?ve had to replace 3 caps on my trusty T102 as they were leaking >>>>> (nasty >>>>> >> as they were fairly recent replacements). The surgery seemed to have >>>>> >> worked, except for increase noise. It?s the kind of noise where you >>>>> can >>>>> >> hear the processing of the CPU, more when its busy and it seems to >>>>> have >>>>> >> clear ?structure? to it in relation to what the T102 is doing. >>>>> >> Is this a sign that the same or other caps are not ok? Does anyone >>>>> have >>>>> >> experience with this. I really want to get this capacitor business >>>>> over >>>>> >> with for once and at least a bunch of years (I?m having too much >>>>> fun with >>>>> >> the t102 to let it just die). >>>>> >> Any thoughts on how to fix this? >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Cheers, >>>>> >> Erik >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> -------------- next part -------------- >>>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >>>>> URL: <http://lists.bitchin100.com/private.cgi/m100-bitchin100. >>>>> com/attachments/20200617/e8d55117/attachment-0001.html> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>> >>>>> Message: 7 >>>>> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 10:03:53 -0400 >>>>> From: "Jim Toth" <[email protected]> >>>>> To: <[email protected]> >>>>> Subject: Re: [M100] Noisy T102 >>>>> Message-ID: <9B4F59F15D46480A8F74D285D7462EB0@OWNER27B149584> >>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >>>>> >>>>> An AM radio near a Model T sounds like that, too. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>>> From: B 9 >>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 10:52 PM >>>>> Subject: Re: [M100] Noisy T102 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 11:59 PM Erik van der Tier <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> It?s the kind of noise where you can hear the processing of the >>>>> CPU, more when its busy and it seems to have clear ?structure? to it in >>>>> relation to what the T102 is doing. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> That's actually kind of cool. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> But, if you want to get rid of it, maybe double check that you put >>>>> your electrolytics in with the right polarity. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ?b9 >>>>> -------------- next part -------------- >>>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >>>>> URL: <http://lists.bitchin100.com/private.cgi/m100-bitchin100. >>>>> com/attachments/20200617/91116399/attachment-0001.html> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>> >>>>> Message: 8 >>>>> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 11:09:40 -0400 >>>>> From: "Mike Stein" <[email protected]> >>>>> To: <[email protected]> >>>>> Subject: Re: [M100] Noisy T102 >>>>> Message-ID: <625E81B6452F4D1DAC09F88BCACFEA36@310e2> >>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >>>>> >>>>> Have you tried disconnecting the beeper in case bus noise is leaking >>>>> across somehow? >>>>> >>>>> m >>>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>>> From: Erik van der Tier >>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>> Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2020 3:13 AM >>>>> Subject: Re: [M100] Noisy T102 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hehe, yeah, if it couldn?t be a sign of trouble it would definitely >>>>> be cool ;). I remember that other 80?s computers made these kinds of >>>>> sounds >>>>> while processing. I know our Philips P2000T did and later our Amstrad >>>>> CPC464 as well?. Cheap analog electronics I guess? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I did double and triple check the polarity of the caps, so I don?t >>>>> think that?s the problem. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Erik >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 17 Jun 2020, at 04:52, B 9 <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 11:59 PM Erik van der Tier <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> It?s the kind of noise where you can hear the processing of the >>>>> CPU, more when its busy and it seems to have clear ?structure? to it in >>>>> relation to what the T102 is doing. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> That's actually kind of cool. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> But, if you want to get rid of it, maybe double check that you put >>>>> your electrolytics in with the right polarity. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ?b9 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -------------- next part -------------- >>>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >>>>> URL: <http://lists.bitchin100.com/private.cgi/m100-bitchin100. >>>>> com/attachments/20200617/644dc186/attachment-0001.html> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>> >>>>> Message: 9 >>>>> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 10:26:59 -0500 >>>>> From: Bert Put <[email protected]> >>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>> Subject: Re: [M100] Rexcpm update >>>>> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 >>>>> >>>>> Thanks Steve, looking forward to getting mine. :-) >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, Bert >>>>> >>>>> On 6/16/20 9:11 PM, Stephen Adolph wrote: >>>>> > I am well into the 2nd build of REXCPM.? All of the REXCPM modules >>>>> are >>>>> > built, untested, but I still need to build the adapters. >>>>> > So good progress.? I'm aiming to ship the next tranch in 2 weeks or >>>>> sooner. >>>>> > Steve >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>> >>>>> Message: 10 >>>>> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 11:27:54 -0400 >>>>> From: "Alex ..." <[email protected]> >>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>> Subject: Re: [M100] Noisy T102 >>>>> Message-ID: >>>>> <CADB9QZm5soVvNTFOUqAKcDJt6iUws+3kpiJFYKi0n7-5fUNcoQ@mail. >>>>> gmail.com> >>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >>>>> >>>>> Jim, >>>>> Just yesterday I was thinking how my T102 would make a good PSK31 >>>>> terminal, >>>>> but hearing that I'm not so sure about that idea anymore... >>>>> ? >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 10:04 AM Jim Toth <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> > An AM radio near a Model T sounds like that, too. >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > ----- Original Message ----- >>>>> > *From:* B 9 <[email protected]> >>>>> > *To:* [email protected] >>>>> > *Sent:* Tuesday, June 16, 2020 10:52 PM >>>>> > *Subject:* Re: [M100] Noisy T102 >>>>> > >>>>> > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 11:59 PM Erik van der Tier <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> >> It?s the kind of noise where you can hear the processing of the >>>>> CPU, more >>>>> >> when its busy and it seems to have clear ?structure? to it in >>>>> relation to >>>>> >> what the T102 is doing. >>>>> >> >>>>> > >>>>> > That's actually kind of cool. >>>>> > >>>>> > But, if you want to get rid of it, maybe double check that you put >>>>> your >>>>> > electrolytics in with the right polarity. >>>>> > >>>>> > ?b9 >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Disclaimer: Any resemblance between the above views and those of my >>>>> employer, my terminal, or the view out my window are purely >>>>> coincidental. >>>>> Any resemblance between the above and my own views is >>>>> non-deterministic. >>>>> The question of the existence of views in the absence of anyone to hold >>>>> them is left as an exercise for the reader. >>>>> The question of the existence of the reader is left as an exercise for >>>>> the >>>>> second god coefficient. (A discussion of non-orthogonal, non-integral >>>>> polytheism is beyond the scope of this article.) Thanks >>>>> /usr/games/fortune >>>>> -------------- next part -------------- >>>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >>>>> URL: <http://lists.bitchin100.com/private.cgi/m100-bitchin100. >>>>> com/attachments/20200617/e65fa286/attachment-0001.html> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>> >>>>> Message: 11 >>>>> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 17:35:26 +0200 >>>>> From: Erik van der Tier <[email protected]> >>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>> Subject: [M100] Annotated disassemble of T102 rom >>>>> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I?m currently well on my way to merge the annotated M100 rom with a >>>>> disassemble of the T102 rom. This will include documentation of the >>>>> differences. I hope to create a working .asm file with labels and such >>>>> that >>>>> can be reassembled into a functioning Rom (I?m working my way towards a >>>>> custom os-rom for my 102). >>>>> >>>>> If anyone is interested I can put it up on my GitHub account so you >>>>> can get it. I can imagine this could be interesting for the VirtualT >>>>> emulator as it provides all the annotations on disassembling the M100 rom >>>>> but not the T102 currently (except for the RST opcodes). >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Erik >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>> >>>>> Message: 12 >>>>> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 12:06:00 -0400 >>>>> From: Stephen Adolph <[email protected]> >>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>> Subject: Re: [M100] Annotated disassemble of T102 rom >>>>> Message-ID: >>>>> <CAMCMnV6BTU6x6VOx9H33BOXBuYmeBU4FRg7_p7dBwxbML97ESQ@mail. >>>>> gmail.com> >>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >>>>> >>>>> Hi, it would be great to make this collaborative. I have a lot of my >>>>> own >>>>> notes on a disassembly, and I also have a paper disassembly that I >>>>> acquired >>>>> a while back. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 11:35 AM Erik van der Tier <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> > Hi, >>>>> > >>>>> > I?m currently well on my way to merge the annotated M100 rom with a >>>>> > disassemble of the T102 rom. This will include documentation of the >>>>> > differences. I hope to create a working .asm file with labels and >>>>> such that >>>>> > can be reassembled into a functioning Rom (I?m working my way >>>>> towards a >>>>> > custom os-rom for my 102). >>>>> > >>>>> > If anyone is interested I can put it up on my GitHub account so you >>>>> can >>>>> > get it. I can imagine this could be interesting for the VirtualT >>>>> emulator >>>>> > as it provides all the annotations on disassembling the M100 rom but >>>>> not >>>>> > the T102 currently (except for the RST opcodes). >>>>> > >>>>> > Cheers, >>>>> > Erik >>>>> -------------- next part -------------- >>>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >>>>> URL: <http://lists.bitchin100.com/private.cgi/m100-bitchin100. >>>>> com/attachments/20200617/6e646565/attachment-0001.html> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>> >>>>> Message: 13 >>>>> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 09:10:27 -0700 >>>>> From: Ken Pettit <[email protected]> >>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>> Subject: Re: [M100] Annotated disassemble of T102 rom >>>>> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed >>>>> >>>>> Hi Erik, >>>>> >>>>> I presume you are also referencing the additional M100 ROM annotations >>>>> I >>>>> did by hand which are not part of the VirtualT standard output (and >>>>> quite extensive)? >>>>> >>>>> Ken >>>>> >>>>> On 6/17/20 8:35 AM, Erik van der Tier wrote: >>>>> > Hi, >>>>> > >>>>> > I?m currently well on my way to merge the annotated M100 rom with a >>>>> disassemble of the T102 rom. This will include documentation of the >>>>> differences. I hope to create a working .asm file with labels and such >>>>> that >>>>> can be reassembled into a functioning Rom (I?m working my way towards a >>>>> custom os-rom for my 102). >>>>> > >>>>> > If anyone is interested I can put it up on my GitHub account so you >>>>> can get it. I can imagine this could be interesting for the VirtualT >>>>> emulator as it provides all the annotations on disassembling the M100 rom >>>>> but not the T102 currently (except for the RST opcodes). >>>>> > >>>>> > Cheers, >>>>> > Erik >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>> >>>>> Message: 14 >>>>> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 19:21:20 +0200 >>>>> From: Erik van der Tier <[email protected]> >>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>> Subject: Re: [M100] Annotated disassemble of T102 rom >>>>> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >>>>> >>>>> Sounds like a plan, I?m currently doing a first pass getting the >>>>> routine headercomments in and translating the none sense opcodes into db >>>>> and dw?s from the m100 dis. I?ll set up a github repo once I?m through >>>>> this >>>>> first pass. Next pass will be find and replace on all standard addresses >>>>> and known rom functions. That way the m100 and t102 should be mostly >>>>> identical which should help adding the other comments that are available. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Erik >>>>> >>>>> > On 17 Jun 2020, at 18:06, Stephen Adolph <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > ? >>>>> > Hi, it would be great to make this collaborative. I have a lot of my >>>>> own notes on a disassembly, and I also have a paper disassembly that I >>>>> acquired a while back. >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> >> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 11:35 AM Erik van der Tier <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >> Hi, >>>>> >> >>>>> >> I?m currently well on my way to merge the annotated M100 rom with a >>>>> disassemble of the T102 rom. This will include documentation of the >>>>> differences. I hope to create a working .asm file with labels and such >>>>> that >>>>> can be reassembled into a functioning Rom (I?m working my way towards a >>>>> custom os-rom for my 102). >>>>> >> >>>>> >> If anyone is interested I can put it up on my GitHub account so you >>>>> can get it. I can imagine this could be interesting for the VirtualT >>>>> emulator as it provides all the annotations on disassembling the M100 rom >>>>> but not the T102 currently (except for the RST opcodes). >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Cheers, >>>>> >> Erik >>>>> -------------- next part -------------- >>>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >>>>> URL: <http://lists.bitchin100.com/private.cgi/m100-bitchin100. >>>>> com/attachments/20200617/09e3442f/attachment-0001.html> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>> >>>>> Message: 15 >>>>> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 19:22:27 +0200 >>>>> From: Erik van der Tier <[email protected]> >>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>> Subject: Re: [M100] Annotated disassemble of T102 rom >>>>> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 >>>>> >>>>> I?m currently merging the standard virtual-t output, but any >>>>> additional notes and comments would be great to add in! >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Erik >>>>> >>>>> > On 17 Jun 2020, at 18:10, Ken Pettit <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > ?Hi Erik, >>>>> > >>>>> > I presume you are also referencing the additional M100 ROM >>>>> annotations I did by hand which are not part of the VirtualT standard >>>>> output (and quite extensive)? >>>>> > >>>>> > Ken >>>>> > >>>>> >> On 6/17/20 8:35 AM, Erik van der Tier wrote: >>>>> >> Hi, >>>>> >> >>>>> >> I?m currently well on my way to merge the annotated M100 rom with a >>>>> disassemble of the T102 rom. This will include documentation of the >>>>> differences. I hope to create a working .asm file with labels and such >>>>> that >>>>> can be reassembled into a functioning Rom (I?m working my way towards a >>>>> custom os-rom for my 102). >>>>> >> >>>>> >> If anyone is interested I can put it up on my GitHub account so you >>>>> can get it. I can imagine this could be interesting for the VirtualT >>>>> emulator as it provides all the annotations on disassembling the M100 rom >>>>> but not the T102 currently (except for the RST opcodes). >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Cheers, >>>>> >> Erik >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>> >>>>> Message: 16 >>>>> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 10:28:38 -0700 >>>>> From: Ken Pettit <[email protected]> >>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>> Subject: Re: [M100] Annotated disassemble of T102 rom >>>>> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed >>>>> >>>>> Erik, >>>>> >>>>> I have MANY, MANY more lines commented here: >>>>> >>>>> http://www.club100.org/memfiles/index.php?&direction= >>>>> 0&order=&directory=Ken%20Pettit/M100%20ROM%20Disassembly >>>>> >>>>> Ken >>>>> >>>>> On 6/17/20 10:22 AM, Erik van der Tier wrote: >>>>> > I?m currently merging the standard virtual-t output, but any >>>>> additional notes and comments would be great to add in! >>>>> > >>>>> > Cheers, >>>>> > Erik >>>>> > >>>>> >> On 17 Jun 2020, at 18:10, Ken Pettit <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >> >>>>> >> ?Hi Erik, >>>>> >> >>>>> >> I presume you are also referencing the additional M100 ROM >>>>> annotations I did by hand which are not part of the VirtualT standard >>>>> output (and quite extensive)? >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Ken >>>>> >> >>>>> >>> On 6/17/20 8:35 AM, Erik van der Tier wrote: >>>>> >>> Hi, >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> I?m currently well on my way to merge the annotated M100 rom with >>>>> a disassemble of the T102 rom. This will include documentation of the >>>>> differences. I hope to create a working .asm file with labels and such >>>>> that >>>>> can be reassembled into a functioning Rom (I?m working my way towards a >>>>> custom os-rom for my 102). >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> If anyone is interested I can put it up on my GitHub account so >>>>> you can get it. I can imagine this could be interesting for the VirtualT >>>>> emulator as it provides all the annotations on disassembling the M100 rom >>>>> but not the T102 currently (except for the RST opcodes). >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> Cheers, >>>>> >>> Erik >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>> >>>>> Message: 17 >>>>> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 20:31:36 +0000 >>>>> From: ethan saul <[email protected]> >>>>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>>>> Subject: [M100] Tandy 200 Black Screen >>>>> Message-ID: >>>>> <VI1PR0701MB6768E80573A4C2B02837210A8F9A0@VI1PR0701MB6768. >>>>> eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> >>>>> >>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" >>>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> Anyone know anything about Tandy 200 black screen of death? I have >>>>> changed the CMOS battery and tried a cold start using >>>>> CTRL+SHIFT+BREAK+RESET. >>>>> When I power it on I hear a click from the speaker and the screen goes >>>>> black the contrast knob doesn't dim or darken the screen. >>>>> I have also tried getting it to go into basic and beeping the speaker >>>>> with no luck. The machine was working before the battery change however >>>>> the >>>>> old battery was leaking so I had to change it. >>>>> There was no corrosion and the battery area was cleaned with >>>>> Isopropanol. >>>>> Also the Power button turns the computer off and then back on straight >>>>> after every time I push it and when there is power from either the >>>>> battery?s and the ac adapter. >>>>> Any Ideas what could be the problem? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Ethan >>>>> -------------- next part -------------- >>>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >>>>> URL: <http://lists.bitchin100.com/private.cgi/m100-bitchin100. >>>>> com/attachments/20200617/68382e4e/attachment-0001.html> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>> >>>>> Message: 18 >>>>> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 16:36:00 -0400 >>>>> From: Stephen Adolph <[email protected]> >>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>> Subject: Re: [M100] Tandy 200 Black Screen >>>>> Message-ID: >>>>> <CAMCMnV7cK2=LMb2O1ccb=buJwgsaSdNgRsUzp74pvYEvLoWmeA@mail. >>>>> gmail.com> >>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >>>>> >>>>> Did you double check the polarity of the new battery? >>>>> If the CMOS battery was flat on install, it will take some time to >>>>> charge >>>>> up. >>>>> It has to be charged or the T200 won't work. >>>>> ..Steve >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 4:31 PM ethan saul <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> > Hi all, >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > Anyone know anything about Tandy 200 black screen of death? I have >>>>> changed >>>>> > the CMOS battery and tried a cold start using CTRL+SHIFT+BREAK+RESET. >>>>> > >>>>> > When I power it on I hear a click from the speaker and the screen >>>>> goes >>>>> > black the contrast knob doesn't dim or darken the screen. >>>>> > >>>>> > I have also tried getting it to go into basic and beeping the >>>>> speaker with >>>>> > no luck. The machine was working before the battery change however >>>>> the old >>>>> > battery was leaking so I had to change it. >>>>> > >>>>> > There was no corrosion and the battery area was cleaned with >>>>> Isopropanol. >>>>> > >>>>> > Also the Power button turns the computer off and then back on >>>>> straight >>>>> > after every time I push it and when there is power from either the >>>>> > battery?s and the ac adapter. >>>>> > >>>>> > Any Ideas what could be the problem? >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > Thanks, >>>>> > >>>>> > Ethan >>>>> > >>>>> -------------- next part -------------- >>>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >>>>> URL: <http://lists.bitchin100.com/private.cgi/m100-bitchin100. >>>>> com/attachments/20200617/d0bbfdd8/attachment-0001.html> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>> >>>>> Subject: Digest Footer >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> M100 mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://lists.bitchin100.com/listinfo.cgi/m100-bitchin100.com >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>> >>>>> End of M100 Digest, Vol 114, Issue 12 >>>>> ************************************* >>>>> >>>>>
