I see from the docs that the vt100 driver isn't REX compatible. Should I remove REX's hooks first, and can I restore REX with the usual call afterwards?
On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 4:37 PM Stephen Adolph <[email protected]> wrote: > Give it a try! Note that a normal vt100 does ot work perfectly. As I > say in the wiki page, a vt100 does not have certain commands that the model > T needs. > > On Friday, June 19, 2020, Dan Higdon <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Ah, perfect, I missed the vt100 driver for the ModelT last time I read >> that page. Thank you. >> Option 3 for right now, with my PC and PuTTY playing the role of a vt100 >> terminal. >> Hopefully Option 2 at some point. >> >> On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 3:09 PM Stephen Adolph <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> http://bitchin100.com/wiki/index.php?title=VT100 >>> >>> Link to the page.. >>> Hope that helps. >>> >>> Steve >>> >>> On Friday, June 19, 2020, Stephen Adolph <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Well what do you want screen 1 to be? >>>> >>>> Option 1. A real DVI, with original DVI software >>>> >>>> Option 2. Using my hack of the DVI software, and the MVT100 video >>>> adapter >>>> >>>> Option 3. Using my hack of the DVI software plus an rs232 connected >>>> terminal as the display >>>> >>>> I believe i have posted the software at bitchin100. MTV100 adapter is >>>> still waiting for parts . Hopefully I will have kits soon. >>>> >>>> Steve >>>> >>>> >>>> On Friday, June 19, 2020, Dan Higdon <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Where do I get whatever I need to add "screen 1" as a valid command? >>>>> It occurs to me that I can actually use PuTTY to be my 80x25 display >>>>> while I'm working my way up to building a vt100 connector. >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Dan >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 10:11 PM Mike Stein <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Welcome to the list and the 'Model T' community! >>>>>> >>>>>> As a matter of fact several slightly different external 80x25 video >>>>>> adapters do exist, although unlike the DVI which connects to the system >>>>>> bus >>>>>> these connect either to the RS-232 com port or, with a minor board mod, >>>>>> to >>>>>> the BCR port. >>>>>> >>>>>> See >>>>>> http://bitchin100.com/wiki/index.php?title=File:VT100_1.jpg >>>>>> >>>>>> and >>>>>> http://bitchin100.com/wiki/index.php?title=BCR_TTL_SERIAL_HACK >>>>>> >>>>>> for a version adapted to the M100 by Steve Adolph, a list member, >>>>>> currently awaiting production quantity parts. >>>>>> >>>>>> Note that the BCR port mod may be superseded by a different internal >>>>>> connection. >>>>>> >>>>>> m >>>>>> >>>>>> ---- Original Message ----- >>>>>> >>>>>> *From:* David B <[email protected]> >>>>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 17, 2020 7:48 PM >>>>>> *Subject:* [M100] Video out adapter? >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi just got a (working!) model 100 off eBay and replaced the nicd >>>>>> battery. So far, so good. >>>>>> >>>>>> Learning about this computer and just read there was a combined >>>>>> external disk and video adapter. I'm interested in the external video >>>>>> part. >>>>>> Has anyone designed an external video adapter for this, that can be built >>>>>> by a hobbyist? >>>>>> >>>>>> thanks, >>>>>> David >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>> *From:* M100 <[email protected]> on behalf of >>>>>> [email protected] <[email protected]> >>>>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 17, 2020 1:39 PM >>>>>> *To:* [email protected] <[email protected]> >>>>>> *Subject:* M100 Digest, Vol 114, Issue 12 >>>>>> >>>>>> Send M100 mailing list submissions to >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> >>>>>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >>>>>> http://lists.bitchin100.com/listinfo.cgi/m100-bitchin100.com >>>>>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> >>>>>> You can reach the person managing the list at >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> >>>>>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >>>>>> than "Re: Contents of M100 digest..." >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Today's Topics: >>>>>> >>>>>> 1. Rexcpm update (Stephen Adolph) >>>>>> 2. Re: Rexcpm update (David Rogers) >>>>>> 3. Re: Noisy T102 (B 9) >>>>>> 4. Re: Noisy T102 (Erik van der Tier) >>>>>> 5. Re: Noisy T102 (Erik van der Tier) >>>>>> 6. Re: Noisy T102 (Stephen Adolph) >>>>>> 7. Re: Noisy T102 (Jim Toth) >>>>>> 8. Re: Noisy T102 (Mike Stein) >>>>>> 9. Re: Rexcpm update (Bert Put) >>>>>> 10. Re: Noisy T102 (Alex ...) >>>>>> 11. Annotated disassemble of T102 rom (Erik van der Tier) >>>>>> 12. Re: Annotated disassemble of T102 rom (Stephen Adolph) >>>>>> 13. Re: Annotated disassemble of T102 rom (Ken Pettit) >>>>>> 14. Re: Annotated disassemble of T102 rom (Erik van der Tier) >>>>>> 15. Re: Annotated disassemble of T102 rom (Erik van der Tier) >>>>>> 16. Re: Annotated disassemble of T102 rom (Ken Pettit) >>>>>> 17. Tandy 200 Black Screen (ethan saul) >>>>>> 18. Re: Tandy 200 Black Screen (Stephen Adolph) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> >>>>>> Message: 1 >>>>>> Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 22:11:30 -0400 >>>>>> From: Stephen Adolph <[email protected]> >>>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>>> Subject: [M100] Rexcpm update >>>>>> Message-ID: >>>>>> < >>>>>> camcmnv7xfugfhuq2w+inw9qm77wvuhxzhew+qodgaz2adgz...@mail.gmail.com> >>>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >>>>>> >>>>>> I am well into the 2nd build of REXCPM. All of the REXCPM modules are >>>>>> built, untested, but I still need to build the adapters. >>>>>> So good progress. I'm aiming to ship the next tranch in 2 weeks or >>>>>> sooner. >>>>>> Steve >>>>>> -------------- next part -------------- >>>>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >>>>>> URL: < >>>>>> http://lists.bitchin100.com/private.cgi/m100-bitchin100.com/attachments/20200616/892a2d16/attachment-0001.html >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>> >>>>>> Message: 2 >>>>>> Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 19:43:57 -0700 >>>>>> From: David Rogers <[email protected]> >>>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>>> Subject: Re: [M100] Rexcpm update >>>>>> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >>>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >>>>>> >>>>>> ???? >>>>>> >>>>>> David, WA7ZYQ >>>>>> >>>>>> C?est la vie, c?est la guerre, viva la salade de pommes de terre. >>>>>> >>>>>> > On Jun 16, 2020, at 7:11 PM, Stephen Adolph <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> > >>>>>> > I am well into the 2nd build of REXCPM. All of the REXCPM modules >>>>>> are built, untested, but I still need to build the adapters. >>>>>> > So good progress. I'm aiming to ship the next tranch in 2 weeks or >>>>>> sooner. >>>>>> > Steve >>>>>> -------------- next part -------------- >>>>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >>>>>> URL: < >>>>>> http://lists.bitchin100.com/private.cgi/m100-bitchin100.com/attachments/20200616/84e5c9e2/attachment-0001.html >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>> >>>>>> Message: 3 >>>>>> Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 19:52:31 -0700 >>>>>> From: B 9 <[email protected]> >>>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>>> Subject: Re: [M100] Noisy T102 >>>>>> Message-ID: >>>>>> < >>>>>> cag1tpetpsaurqtuc1dsayoqbdhlsrtnkcbrehfvk7pzuxzr...@mail.gmail.com> >>>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 11:59 PM Erik van der Tier <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> > It?s the kind of noise where you can hear the processing of the >>>>>> CPU, more >>>>>> > when its busy and it seems to have clear ?structure? to it in >>>>>> relation to >>>>>> > what the T102 is doing. >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>> That's actually kind of cool. >>>>>> >>>>>> But, if you want to get rid of it, maybe double check that you put >>>>>> your >>>>>> electrolytics in with the right polarity. >>>>>> >>>>>> ?b9 >>>>>> -------------- next part -------------- >>>>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >>>>>> URL: < >>>>>> http://lists.bitchin100.com/private.cgi/m100-bitchin100.com/attachments/20200616/64f85f17/attachment-0001.html >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>> >>>>>> Message: 4 >>>>>> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 09:13:58 +0200 >>>>>> From: Erik van der Tier <[email protected]> >>>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>>> Subject: Re: [M100] Noisy T102 >>>>>> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >>>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >>>>>> >>>>>> Hehe, yeah, if it couldn?t be a sign of trouble it would definitely >>>>>> be cool ;). I remember that other 80?s computers made these kinds of >>>>>> sounds >>>>>> while processing. I know our Philips P2000T did and later our Amstrad >>>>>> CPC464 as well?. Cheap analog electronics I guess? >>>>>> >>>>>> I did double and triple check the polarity of the caps, so I don?t >>>>>> think that?s the problem. >>>>>> >>>>>> Erik >>>>>> >>>>>> > On 17 Jun 2020, at 04:52, B 9 <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> > >>>>>> > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 11:59 PM Erik van der Tier <[email protected] >>>>>> <mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>>> wrote: >>>>>> > It?s the kind of noise where you can hear the processing of the >>>>>> CPU, more when its busy and it seems to have clear ?structure? to it in >>>>>> relation to what the T102 is doing. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > That's actually kind of cool. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > But, if you want to get rid of it, maybe double check that you put >>>>>> your electrolytics in with the right polarity. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > ?b9 >>>>>> >>>>>> -------------- next part -------------- >>>>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >>>>>> URL: < >>>>>> http://lists.bitchin100.com/private.cgi/m100-bitchin100.com/attachments/20200617/9dbcc183/attachment-0001.html >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>> >>>>>> Message: 5 >>>>>> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 09:15:52 +0200 >>>>>> From: Erik van der Tier <[email protected]> >>>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>>> Subject: Re: [M100] Noisy T102 >>>>>> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >>>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >>>>>> >>>>>> I have to open it up again, tonight to check on leaking anyway, so >>>>>> I?ll look up the numbers of those caps. I really need to get myself a >>>>>> decent desoldering station, it?s currently taking too much time to >>>>>> desolder >>>>>> these buggers. >>>>>> >>>>>> Erik >>>>>> >>>>>> > On 16 Jun 2020, at 13:31, Stephen Adolph <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> > >>>>>> > That's interesting! >>>>>> > Could be that one of the caps you replaced on the +5V line is now >>>>>> microphonic, or the transformer caps. >>>>>> > Which ones did you replace? >>>>>> > It would be interesting to see if you can isolate it. If you had >>>>>> some alternative caps that you could try for the 3 you have changed, you >>>>>> could try changing one at a time. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 2:59 AM Erik van der Tier <[email protected] < >>>>>> mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>>> wrote: >>>>>> > Hi All, >>>>>> > >>>>>> > I?ve had to replace 3 caps on my trusty T102 as they were leaking >>>>>> (nasty as they were fairly recent replacements). The surgery seemed to >>>>>> have >>>>>> worked, except for increase noise. It?s the kind of noise where you can >>>>>> hear the processing of the CPU, more when its busy and it seems to have >>>>>> clear ?structure? to it in relation to what the T102 is doing. >>>>>> > Is this a sign that the same or other caps are not ok? Does anyone >>>>>> have experience with this. I really want to get this capacitor business >>>>>> over with for once and at least a bunch of years (I?m having too much fun >>>>>> with the t102 to let it just die). >>>>>> > Any thoughts on how to fix this? >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Cheers, >>>>>> > Erik >>>>>> >>>>>> -------------- next part -------------- >>>>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >>>>>> URL: < >>>>>> http://lists.bitchin100.com/private.cgi/m100-bitchin100.com/attachments/20200617/a2a35b3f/attachment-0001.html >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>> >>>>>> Message: 6 >>>>>> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 07:54:07 -0400 >>>>>> From: Stephen Adolph <[email protected]> >>>>>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>>>>> Subject: Re: [M100] Noisy T102 >>>>>> Message-ID: >>>>>> < >>>>>> camcmnv5qbw3jgivop_6qnypwqfap1+3tpehhbh0okq_n5ss...@mail.gmail.com> >>>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >>>>>> >>>>>> Heres a tip. For leaded electrolytic caps I "walk" them out by >>>>>> heating one >>>>>> lead and leaning the cap to one side such that the loose lead can >>>>>> slide out >>>>>> a bit. Then I do the same for the other lead, alternating back and >>>>>> forth >>>>>> until it is fully out. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wednesday, June 17, 2020, Erik van der Tier <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> > I have to open it up again, tonight to check on leaking anyway, so >>>>>> I?ll >>>>>> > look up the numbers of those caps. I really need to get myself a >>>>>> decent >>>>>> > desoldering station, it?s currently taking too much time to >>>>>> desolder these >>>>>> > buggers. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Erik >>>>>> > >>>>>> > On 16 Jun 2020, at 13:31, Stephen Adolph <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> > >>>>>> > That's interesting! >>>>>> > Could be that one of the caps you replaced on the +5V line is now >>>>>> > microphonic, or the transformer caps. >>>>>> > Which ones did you replace? >>>>>> > It would be interesting to see if you can isolate it. If you had >>>>>> some >>>>>> > alternative caps that you could try for the 3 you have changed, you >>>>>> could >>>>>> > try changing one at a time. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 2:59 AM Erik van der Tier <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> > >>>>>> >> Hi All, >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> I?ve had to replace 3 caps on my trusty T102 as they were leaking >>>>>> (nasty >>>>>> >> as they were fairly recent replacements). The surgery seemed to >>>>>> have >>>>>> >> worked, except for increase noise. It?s the kind of noise where >>>>>> you can >>>>>> >> hear the processing of the CPU, more when its busy and it seems to >>>>>> have >>>>>> >> clear ?structure? to it in relation to what the T102 is doing. >>>>>> >> Is this a sign that the same or other caps are not ok? Does anyone >>>>>> have >>>>>> >> experience with this. I really want to get this capacitor business >>>>>> over >>>>>> >> with for once and at least a bunch of years (I?m having too much >>>>>> fun with >>>>>> >> the t102 to let it just die). >>>>>> >> Any thoughts on how to fix this? >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> Cheers, >>>>>> >> Erik >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -------------- next part -------------- >>>>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >>>>>> URL: < >>>>>> http://lists.bitchin100.com/private.cgi/m100-bitchin100.com/attachments/20200617/e8d55117/attachment-0001.html >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>> >>>>>> Message: 7 >>>>>> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 10:03:53 -0400 >>>>>> From: "Jim Toth" <[email protected]> >>>>>> To: <[email protected]> >>>>>> Subject: Re: [M100] Noisy T102 >>>>>> Message-ID: <9B4F59F15D46480A8F74D285D7462EB0@OWNER27B149584> >>>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >>>>>> >>>>>> An AM radio near a Model T sounds like that, too. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>>>> From: B 9 >>>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 10:52 PM >>>>>> Subject: Re: [M100] Noisy T102 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 11:59 PM Erik van der Tier <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> It?s the kind of noise where you can hear the processing of the >>>>>> CPU, more when its busy and it seems to have clear ?structure? to it in >>>>>> relation to what the T102 is doing. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> That's actually kind of cool. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> But, if you want to get rid of it, maybe double check that you put >>>>>> your electrolytics in with the right polarity. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ?b9 >>>>>> -------------- next part -------------- >>>>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >>>>>> URL: < >>>>>> http://lists.bitchin100.com/private.cgi/m100-bitchin100.com/attachments/20200617/91116399/attachment-0001.html >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>> >>>>>> Message: 8 >>>>>> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 11:09:40 -0400 >>>>>> From: "Mike Stein" <[email protected]> >>>>>> To: <[email protected]> >>>>>> Subject: Re: [M100] Noisy T102 >>>>>> Message-ID: <625E81B6452F4D1DAC09F88BCACFEA36@310e2> >>>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >>>>>> >>>>>> Have you tried disconnecting the beeper in case bus noise is leaking >>>>>> across somehow? >>>>>> >>>>>> m >>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>>>> From: Erik van der Tier >>>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2020 3:13 AM >>>>>> Subject: Re: [M100] Noisy T102 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Hehe, yeah, if it couldn?t be a sign of trouble it would definitely >>>>>> be cool ;). I remember that other 80?s computers made these kinds of >>>>>> sounds >>>>>> while processing. I know our Philips P2000T did and later our Amstrad >>>>>> CPC464 as well?. Cheap analog electronics I guess? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I did double and triple check the polarity of the caps, so I don?t >>>>>> think that?s the problem. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Erik >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 17 Jun 2020, at 04:52, B 9 <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 11:59 PM Erik van der Tier < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> It?s the kind of noise where you can hear the processing of the >>>>>> CPU, more when its busy and it seems to have clear ?structure? to it in >>>>>> relation to what the T102 is doing. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> That's actually kind of cool. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> But, if you want to get rid of it, maybe double check that you >>>>>> put your electrolytics in with the right polarity. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ?b9 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -------------- next part -------------- >>>>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >>>>>> URL: < >>>>>> http://lists.bitchin100.com/private.cgi/m100-bitchin100.com/attachments/20200617/644dc186/attachment-0001.html >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>> >>>>>> Message: 9 >>>>>> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 10:26:59 -0500 >>>>>> From: Bert Put <[email protected]> >>>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>>> Subject: Re: [M100] Rexcpm update >>>>>> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >>>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks Steve, looking forward to getting mine. :-) >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, Bert >>>>>> >>>>>> On 6/16/20 9:11 PM, Stephen Adolph wrote: >>>>>> > I am well into the 2nd build of REXCPM.? All of the REXCPM modules >>>>>> are >>>>>> > built, untested, but I still need to build the adapters. >>>>>> > So good progress.? I'm aiming to ship the next tranch in 2 weeks or >>>>>> sooner. >>>>>> > Steve >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>> >>>>>> Message: 10 >>>>>> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 11:27:54 -0400 >>>>>> From: "Alex ..." <[email protected]> >>>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>>> Subject: Re: [M100] Noisy T102 >>>>>> Message-ID: >>>>>> < >>>>>> cadb9qzm5sovvntfouqakcdjt6iuws+3kpijfyki0n7-5fun...@mail.gmail.com> >>>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >>>>>> >>>>>> Jim, >>>>>> Just yesterday I was thinking how my T102 would make a good PSK31 >>>>>> terminal, >>>>>> but hearing that I'm not so sure about that idea anymore... >>>>>> ? >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 10:04 AM Jim Toth <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> > An AM radio near a Model T sounds like that, too. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > ----- Original Message ----- >>>>>> > *From:* B 9 <[email protected]> >>>>>> > *To:* [email protected] >>>>>> > *Sent:* Tuesday, June 16, 2020 10:52 PM >>>>>> > *Subject:* Re: [M100] Noisy T102 >>>>>> > >>>>>> > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 11:59 PM Erik van der Tier <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> > >>>>>> >> It?s the kind of noise where you can hear the processing of the >>>>>> CPU, more >>>>>> >> when its busy and it seems to have clear ?structure? to it in >>>>>> relation to >>>>>> >> what the T102 is doing. >>>>>> >> >>>>>> > >>>>>> > That's actually kind of cool. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > But, if you want to get rid of it, maybe double check that you put >>>>>> your >>>>>> > electrolytics in with the right polarity. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > ?b9 >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Disclaimer: Any resemblance between the above views and those of my >>>>>> employer, my terminal, or the view out my window are purely >>>>>> coincidental. >>>>>> Any resemblance between the above and my own views is >>>>>> non-deterministic. >>>>>> The question of the existence of views in the absence of anyone to >>>>>> hold >>>>>> them is left as an exercise for the reader. >>>>>> The question of the existence of the reader is left as an exercise >>>>>> for the >>>>>> second god coefficient. (A discussion of non-orthogonal, non-integral >>>>>> polytheism is beyond the scope of this article.) Thanks >>>>>> /usr/games/fortune >>>>>> -------------- next part -------------- >>>>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >>>>>> URL: < >>>>>> http://lists.bitchin100.com/private.cgi/m100-bitchin100.com/attachments/20200617/e65fa286/attachment-0001.html >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>> >>>>>> Message: 11 >>>>>> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 17:35:26 +0200 >>>>>> From: Erik van der Tier <[email protected]> >>>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>>> Subject: [M100] Annotated disassemble of T102 rom >>>>>> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >>>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> I?m currently well on my way to merge the annotated M100 rom with a >>>>>> disassemble of the T102 rom. This will include documentation of the >>>>>> differences. I hope to create a working .asm file with labels and such >>>>>> that >>>>>> can be reassembled into a functioning Rom (I?m working my way towards a >>>>>> custom os-rom for my 102). >>>>>> >>>>>> If anyone is interested I can put it up on my GitHub account so you >>>>>> can get it. I can imagine this could be interesting for the VirtualT >>>>>> emulator as it provides all the annotations on disassembling the M100 rom >>>>>> but not the T102 currently (except for the RST opcodes). >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> Erik >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>> >>>>>> Message: 12 >>>>>> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 12:06:00 -0400 >>>>>> From: Stephen Adolph <[email protected]> >>>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>>> Subject: Re: [M100] Annotated disassemble of T102 rom >>>>>> Message-ID: >>>>>> < >>>>>> camcmnv6btu6x6vox9h33boxbuymebu4frg7_p7dbwxbml97...@mail.gmail.com> >>>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi, it would be great to make this collaborative. I have a lot of my >>>>>> own >>>>>> notes on a disassembly, and I also have a paper disassembly that I >>>>>> acquired >>>>>> a while back. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 11:35 AM Erik van der Tier <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> > Hi, >>>>>> > >>>>>> > I?m currently well on my way to merge the annotated M100 rom with a >>>>>> > disassemble of the T102 rom. This will include documentation of the >>>>>> > differences. I hope to create a working .asm file with labels and >>>>>> such that >>>>>> > can be reassembled into a functioning Rom (I?m working my way >>>>>> towards a >>>>>> > custom os-rom for my 102). >>>>>> > >>>>>> > If anyone is interested I can put it up on my GitHub account so you >>>>>> can >>>>>> > get it. I can imagine this could be interesting for the VirtualT >>>>>> emulator >>>>>> > as it provides all the annotations on disassembling the M100 rom >>>>>> but not >>>>>> > the T102 currently (except for the RST opcodes). >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Cheers, >>>>>> > Erik >>>>>> -------------- next part -------------- >>>>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >>>>>> URL: < >>>>>> http://lists.bitchin100.com/private.cgi/m100-bitchin100.com/attachments/20200617/6e646565/attachment-0001.html >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>> >>>>>> Message: 13 >>>>>> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 09:10:27 -0700 >>>>>> From: Ken Pettit <[email protected]> >>>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>>> Subject: Re: [M100] Annotated disassemble of T102 rom >>>>>> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >>>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Erik, >>>>>> >>>>>> I presume you are also referencing the additional M100 ROM >>>>>> annotations I >>>>>> did by hand which are not part of the VirtualT standard output (and >>>>>> quite extensive)? >>>>>> >>>>>> Ken >>>>>> >>>>>> On 6/17/20 8:35 AM, Erik van der Tier wrote: >>>>>> > Hi, >>>>>> > >>>>>> > I?m currently well on my way to merge the annotated M100 rom with a >>>>>> disassemble of the T102 rom. This will include documentation of the >>>>>> differences. I hope to create a working .asm file with labels and such >>>>>> that >>>>>> can be reassembled into a functioning Rom (I?m working my way towards a >>>>>> custom os-rom for my 102). >>>>>> > >>>>>> > If anyone is interested I can put it up on my GitHub account so you >>>>>> can get it. I can imagine this could be interesting for the VirtualT >>>>>> emulator as it provides all the annotations on disassembling the M100 rom >>>>>> but not the T102 currently (except for the RST opcodes). >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Cheers, >>>>>> > Erik >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>> >>>>>> Message: 14 >>>>>> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 19:21:20 +0200 >>>>>> From: Erik van der Tier <[email protected]> >>>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>>> Subject: Re: [M100] Annotated disassemble of T102 rom >>>>>> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >>>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >>>>>> >>>>>> Sounds like a plan, I?m currently doing a first pass getting the >>>>>> routine headercomments in and translating the none sense opcodes into db >>>>>> and dw?s from the m100 dis. I?ll set up a github repo once I?m through >>>>>> this >>>>>> first pass. Next pass will be find and replace on all standard addresses >>>>>> and known rom functions. That way the m100 and t102 should be mostly >>>>>> identical which should help adding the other comments that are available. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> Erik >>>>>> >>>>>> > On 17 Jun 2020, at 18:06, Stephen Adolph <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> > >>>>>> > ? >>>>>> > Hi, it would be great to make this collaborative. I have a lot of >>>>>> my own notes on a disassembly, and I also have a paper disassembly that I >>>>>> acquired a while back. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> >> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 11:35 AM Erik van der Tier <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >> Hi, >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> I?m currently well on my way to merge the annotated M100 rom with >>>>>> a disassemble of the T102 rom. This will include documentation of the >>>>>> differences. I hope to create a working .asm file with labels and such >>>>>> that >>>>>> can be reassembled into a functioning Rom (I?m working my way towards a >>>>>> custom os-rom for my 102). >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> If anyone is interested I can put it up on my GitHub account so >>>>>> you can get it. I can imagine this could be interesting for the VirtualT >>>>>> emulator as it provides all the annotations on disassembling the M100 rom >>>>>> but not the T102 currently (except for the RST opcodes). >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> Cheers, >>>>>> >> Erik >>>>>> -------------- next part -------------- >>>>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >>>>>> URL: < >>>>>> http://lists.bitchin100.com/private.cgi/m100-bitchin100.com/attachments/20200617/09e3442f/attachment-0001.html >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>> >>>>>> Message: 15 >>>>>> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 19:22:27 +0200 >>>>>> From: Erik van der Tier <[email protected]> >>>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>>> Subject: Re: [M100] Annotated disassemble of T102 rom >>>>>> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >>>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 >>>>>> >>>>>> I?m currently merging the standard virtual-t output, but any >>>>>> additional notes and comments would be great to add in! >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> Erik >>>>>> >>>>>> > On 17 Jun 2020, at 18:10, Ken Pettit <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> > >>>>>> > ?Hi Erik, >>>>>> > >>>>>> > I presume you are also referencing the additional M100 ROM >>>>>> annotations I did by hand which are not part of the VirtualT standard >>>>>> output (and quite extensive)? >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Ken >>>>>> > >>>>>> >> On 6/17/20 8:35 AM, Erik van der Tier wrote: >>>>>> >> Hi, >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> I?m currently well on my way to merge the annotated M100 rom with >>>>>> a disassemble of the T102 rom. This will include documentation of the >>>>>> differences. I hope to create a working .asm file with labels and such >>>>>> that >>>>>> can be reassembled into a functioning Rom (I?m working my way towards a >>>>>> custom os-rom for my 102). >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> If anyone is interested I can put it up on my GitHub account so >>>>>> you can get it. I can imagine this could be interesting for the VirtualT >>>>>> emulator as it provides all the annotations on disassembling the M100 rom >>>>>> but not the T102 currently (except for the RST opcodes). >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> Cheers, >>>>>> >> Erik >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>> >>>>>> Message: 16 >>>>>> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 10:28:38 -0700 >>>>>> From: Ken Pettit <[email protected]> >>>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>>> Subject: Re: [M100] Annotated disassemble of T102 rom >>>>>> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >>>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed >>>>>> >>>>>> Erik, >>>>>> >>>>>> I have MANY, MANY more lines commented here: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.club100.org/memfiles/index.php?&direction=0&order=&directory=Ken%20Pettit/M100%20ROM%20Disassembly >>>>>> >>>>>> Ken >>>>>> >>>>>> On 6/17/20 10:22 AM, Erik van der Tier wrote: >>>>>> > I?m currently merging the standard virtual-t output, but any >>>>>> additional notes and comments would be great to add in! >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Cheers, >>>>>> > Erik >>>>>> > >>>>>> >> On 17 Jun 2020, at 18:10, Ken Pettit <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> ?Hi Erik, >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> I presume you are also referencing the additional M100 ROM >>>>>> annotations I did by hand which are not part of the VirtualT standard >>>>>> output (and quite extensive)? >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> Ken >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >>> On 6/17/20 8:35 AM, Erik van der Tier wrote: >>>>>> >>> Hi, >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> I?m currently well on my way to merge the annotated M100 rom with >>>>>> a disassemble of the T102 rom. This will include documentation of the >>>>>> differences. I hope to create a working .asm file with labels and such >>>>>> that >>>>>> can be reassembled into a functioning Rom (I?m working my way towards a >>>>>> custom os-rom for my 102). >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> If anyone is interested I can put it up on my GitHub account so >>>>>> you can get it. I can imagine this could be interesting for the VirtualT >>>>>> emulator as it provides all the annotations on disassembling the M100 rom >>>>>> but not the T102 currently (except for the RST opcodes). >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> Cheers, >>>>>> >>> Erik >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>> >>>>>> Message: 17 >>>>>> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 20:31:36 +0000 >>>>>> From: ethan saul <[email protected]> >>>>>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>>>>> Subject: [M100] Tandy 200 Black Screen >>>>>> Message-ID: >>>>>> < >>>>>> vi1pr0701mb6768e80573a4c2b02837210a8f...@vi1pr0701mb6768.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>> >>>>>> Anyone know anything about Tandy 200 black screen of death? I have >>>>>> changed the CMOS battery and tried a cold start using >>>>>> CTRL+SHIFT+BREAK+RESET. >>>>>> When I power it on I hear a click from the speaker and the screen >>>>>> goes black the contrast knob doesn't dim or darken the screen. >>>>>> I have also tried getting it to go into basic and beeping the speaker >>>>>> with no luck. The machine was working before the battery change however >>>>>> the >>>>>> old battery was leaking so I had to change it. >>>>>> There was no corrosion and the battery area was cleaned with >>>>>> Isopropanol. >>>>>> Also the Power button turns the computer off and then back on >>>>>> straight after every time I push it and when there is power from either >>>>>> the >>>>>> battery?s and the ac adapter. >>>>>> Any Ideas what could be the problem? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Ethan >>>>>> -------------- next part -------------- >>>>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >>>>>> URL: < >>>>>> http://lists.bitchin100.com/private.cgi/m100-bitchin100.com/attachments/20200617/68382e4e/attachment-0001.html >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>> >>>>>> Message: 18 >>>>>> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 16:36:00 -0400 >>>>>> From: Stephen Adolph <[email protected]> >>>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>>> Subject: Re: [M100] Tandy 200 Black Screen >>>>>> Message-ID: >>>>>> <CAMCMnV7cK2=LMb2O1ccb= >>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >>>>>> >>>>>> Did you double check the polarity of the new battery? >>>>>> If the CMOS battery was flat on install, it will take some time to >>>>>> charge >>>>>> up. >>>>>> It has to be charged or the T200 won't work. >>>>>> ..Steve >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 4:31 PM ethan saul <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> > Hi all, >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Anyone know anything about Tandy 200 black screen of death? I have >>>>>> changed >>>>>> > the CMOS battery and tried a cold start using >>>>>> CTRL+SHIFT+BREAK+RESET. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > When I power it on I hear a click from the speaker and the screen >>>>>> goes >>>>>> > black the contrast knob doesn't dim or darken the screen. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > I have also tried getting it to go into basic and beeping the >>>>>> speaker with >>>>>> > no luck. The machine was working before the battery change however >>>>>> the old >>>>>> > battery was leaking so I had to change it. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > There was no corrosion and the battery area was cleaned with >>>>>> Isopropanol. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Also the Power button turns the computer off and then back on >>>>>> straight >>>>>> > after every time I push it and when there is power from either the >>>>>> > battery?s and the ac adapter. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Any Ideas what could be the problem? >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Thanks, >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Ethan >>>>>> > >>>>>> -------------- next part -------------- >>>>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >>>>>> URL: < >>>>>> http://lists.bitchin100.com/private.cgi/m100-bitchin100.com/attachments/20200617/d0bbfdd8/attachment-0001.html >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>> >>>>>> Subject: Digest Footer >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> M100 mailing list >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> http://lists.bitchin100.com/listinfo.cgi/m100-bitchin100.com >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>> >>>>>> End of M100 Digest, Vol 114, Issue 12 >>>>>> ************************************* >>>>>> >>>>>>
