No problem. If we follow the OpenOffice.org way, it will take some times.
But we are OpenOffice.org!
BTW, this is not the first personal attack against me. Last was when I asked for money for the WWDC, where you wrote bad things about me.
You take everything too personally... Sending people who signed NDA and thus (at least you systematically tells so) can't share the contents of sessions at WWDC is nonsense for the project. I won't pay someone to go somewhere and NOT tell me about the visit!!! And yes, it is not about you. It applies in general. I just want to effectively use the money donated by our users.
What is the difference, for the end user, between two assembled cws, and the same in a milestone ?
He gets something predictable?
I disagree again : my patches are only what will be soon added, and they are public : http://eric.bachard.free.fr/mac/aquavcl/patches/ salframe/may07/aquavcl01_ericb.diff
Good - prepare them for aquavcl01 cws please and it will be in the next dev. snapshot of aquavcl01...
*We have* aquavcl01 + aquafilepicker01 and for the ui, we have that too.
Yes, we have two separate child workspaces. There is no defined way to get a build of two cwses in one build. And if they conflict, it is impossible to do -> it doesn't make sense to mix them together.
The point is : better provide what we have *now* instead of wait a long time to finally have the same thing, but later.
Isn't it easier to regularly and automatically provide what we *really* have and work on integrating other pieces of stuff we have elsewhere to our playground so it will be, automatically, in the next round? Say in one day later?
What you propose will add at least two weeks. OpenOffice.org is an adminsitrative monster.
And why two weeks matter when we were working on it for three years? This is funny. Two weeks or month more. Who rushes to get something out even if it is not ready? Why two additional weeks matter?
Yes, and I think they are finally right ( I was not hot at the begining) : it's time to provide something
OK, good that we agreed at the end ;-) So lets work on it now so it is properly done.
Of course we will. We all agree with that, and that's the main reason why I asked to prepare things before to anounce anything.
Do you think we will have them all prepared sooner than in two weeks? ;-)
-- Pavel Janík --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
