Maybe I wasn't clear enought - isn't that what beta releases are about: showing a (sometimes buggy) functionality that will be fully implemented with the final release (i.e. 3.0). So why not use 3.0beta for showing off Aqua functionality as one of the most awaited features for 3.0?
Lp, m. On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 3:35 PM, Martin Srebotnjak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If m2 or m3 is about to be made half-public, why not wait for > dev300beta? That gives enough time for testing and squashing most > annoying Aqua/OSX related bugs? Or would that mean too much of a > delay? > > Lp, m. > > > > On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 2:35 PM, Louis Suarez-Potts > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On 2008-03-18, at 09:02 , Florian Effenberger wrote: > > > > > Hi Shaun, > > > > > > I agree that we need to avoid problems with downloading of the files. > > > > Yes, I agree with that, too. > > > > > > > > > > > My proposal would be that we ALL wait with any announcement (may it > > > be press, blogs or website) until all download servers and torrents > > > work. > > > > All is a pretty big group, and so I assume you do not mean here all > > the flavours of OOo and all its localizations--? Because we've gone > > over this territory before, and anyway the best list to discuss > > release strategy is [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > Can we agree on this? > > > > I think we can agree on which builds to release and on the quality > > standards required for any release. > > > > > > > > > Florian > > > > best > > louis > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
