Hi Chris,

You are absolutely right.

However, I think _minimal_ cooperation --like updating the project home to 
reflect the project status-- is something the original project owner or Google 
could help the world with.
The web is full of links directing people here, who will not find the 
information they need.

A simple note on the project home saying that 
* macfuse is not being actively maintained anymore, and 
* the list archive contains links to alternatives 
could have saved some time for me, and maybe for a lot of other people... not 
to mention the guys answering the Lion compatibility question twice a week :-).

Best Regards,
 Péter


On 2011.11.17., at 19:45, Chris DiBona wrote:

>> I don't list any of the others because I personally only track one
>> list, OSXFUSE, whilst I know there are quite a few alternatives out
>> there that are better documented elsewhere on this increasingly spam
>> filled list. I'd rather people make their own mind up on which fork to
>> follow as each has their own ethos and objectives.
> 
> Ok. So it's okay for people to fork, good!
> 
>> And a project in a stalled state for three years actively blocking
>> those who wish to make it work on an operating system that is now a
>> couple of months old and for the 64-bit native versions of the prior
>> release of said operating system (2009, around the same era as the
>> last release really) is rather much a PITA. One year? Sure, ok, busy.
> 
> After a year, someone should have forked it, obviously. What's the
> problem with this? This isn't about good vs evil.
> 
>> Two years? Perhaps time to look at things. Three years? Accept you're
>> not going to get back to it and move on or support those who wish to
>> help you out. I don't think forking after trying to recover a project
>> and having a company that prides itself on doing no evil and open
>> source step in the way instead of helping to facilitate the
>> improvement of that open source venture.
> 
> Again, open source doesn't mean 'we do whatever Sam Moffat wants' or
> even 'we maintain a piece of software for x years' it doesn't even
> mean that we commit to naming successor projects. It does mean that
> people can fork the software if they don't like how it runs or how the
> project is being run. There isn't anything wrong with that and that's
> why we release under real open source licenses.
> 
> Similarly, It isn't an open source 'venture'. It's a project. We've
> released something like 3k of them, not all of them are successful,
> fewer are under continuous development and fewer still are popular
> enough to warrant restaffing after a developer has moved on. Open
> sourcing something doesn't mean that the original developer has to
> continue to work on it until their last dying breath. It's okay for
> developers to move on, and it is similarly okay to ask that the
> project that is left behind isn't handed over to another and that they
> can fork if they don't like it.
> 
>> Realistically the point of this place at the moment is to keep people
>> up and running with the lights on answering the posts directing
>> traffic and to continue to defend that Google didn't maliciously put
>> this software on their computer secret but most likely some other
>> application did it but just never told you or to explain why
>> com.google.macfuse is crashing on their system after upgrading to
>> Lion. Oh and to get spam because that never gets old
> 
> I'm not going to begin to parse this, or reply further to this thread.
> Please fork this project and tell people where to find it.
> 
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> 
>> Sam Moffatt
>> http://pasamio.id.au
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 12:15 AM, Chris DiBona <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> It's not evil for a developer to wish to maintain a project even in a
>>> stalled state. Nor is it evil to fork a project you see as being dead.
>>> So, please fork the code, and do wonderful work with it. Why don't you
>>> list some of the lists so that those who are interested can go check
>>> out those lists?
>>> 
>>> Chris
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Sam Moffatt <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> MacFUSE has been abandoned by it's owner for quite a long time. An
>>>> attempt to recover the project was made but Google in their infinite
>>>> wisdom reverted this because it was originally developed by a Googler
>>>> and returned the project back to said Googler ensuring that MacFUSE as
>>>> a name will die due to lack of interest from the owner. Do no evil
>>>> right?
>>>> 
>>>> If you don't want spam, I'd suggest signing up to the lists of one of
>>>> the forked projects instead which are actively maintained and not
>>>> being ignored.
>>>> 
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> 
>>>> Sam Moffatt
>>>> http://pasamio.id.au
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 6:30 AM, Paul Eipper <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> Is there a mod of this list that can clean the spam out by
>>>>> kicking/banning the spammer accounts?
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> Paul Eipper
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>>>> "MacFUSE" group.
>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>> [email protected].
>>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macfuse?hl=en.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Director of Open Source, Google Inc.
>>> Our open source and developer programs can be found at 
>>> http://code.google.com
>>> Site, Bio, Pics: http://dibona.com Google Plus: http://goo.gl/MRK6a
>>> Twitter: @cdibona
>>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Director of Open Source, Google Inc.
> Our open source and developer programs can be found at http://code.google.com
> Site, Bio, Pics: http://dibona.com Google Plus: http://goo.gl/MRK6a
> Twitter: @cdibona
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "MacFUSE" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/macfuse?hl=en.
> 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacFUSE" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macfuse?hl=en.

Reply via email to