manskybook wrote: > On Feb 6, 2010, at 6:06 PM, LuKreme wrote: > > On 6-Feb-2010, at 14:34, Larry Gusaas wrote: >> On 2010/02/06 2:15 PM Jared Earle wrote: >>> On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 6:02 PM, John Musbach<[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> For what, saying the truth? >>>> >>> No, for using a non-cromulent word. >> >> What is cromulent? I can't find it in any of my dictionaries. > > <http://tinyurl.com/ygmjnwo>
top or bottom posting, we're just creating a placeholder for until a more elegant solutions arrives. Really - quote levels with bars on the left; quotes always containing some more or less arbitrary portion of the previous discussion? Having to figure out whether someone knows ancient web etiquette or ignores the form and feelings of the learned ones? Please... Google wave, if it could live up to its own hype, might begin to break down the text-only conventions we struggle with now. Good luck to Google - Lotus Notes buckles under the weight of ponderous solutions to the same. But this text-quote, plain-text email thing is an anachronism, so argue all you will. We all know the iPad will solve the problem ;-) msb_______________________________________________ MacOSX-admin mailing list [email protected] http://www.omnigroup.com/mailman/listinfo/macosx-admin
