On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 11:58:55AM CST, Neil Laubenthal <[email protected]> 
wrote:
> 
> I wouldn't expect Apple to use minis . . although XGrid might be a
> possibility the lack of FC in the mini and the rack inefficiency of
> Pros makes them unlikely. Strictly from a server standpoint . .
> .commodity server hardware running Red Hat or a modified Darwin kernel
> seems like the best solution . . .although given that they might want
> to eat their own dog food the virtualized Lion installations running
> on VMWare might be a good idea as well. They could even XGrid a bunch
> of relatively small VMs to spread the performance across multiple
> physical hosts and let all of the FC/SAN stuff be handled by the
> commodity hardware.

I think commodity hardware is the most practical path, but on a much
larger scale.  Maybe Steve Jobs took a page from Eric Schmidt and
developed an Apple version of the Google Cluster Architecture?  


-- 
Eugene
http://www.coxar.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/
_______________________________________________
MacOSX-admin mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.omnigroup.com/mailman/listinfo/macosx-admin

Reply via email to