On Mar 9, 2011, at 2:37 PM, objectwerks inc wrote: > > You can call it all you want but you are still wrong. I am getting 3 copies > of all your email.
Whether I reply all to the list mail, or the one directly from you, the resulting reply has exactly one copy of your email address and one copy for the list. I do not have an explanation why you are getting three. > I am not going to spoon feed you. When you hit reply all, you need to make > sure it is going where you want it to go. I am not going to spoon feed you. I am going to hit the button that makes it go to the list. If that button makes it send 19 copies to you, I will not accept responsibility for retardation on the part of either a piece of software or a listserve. > Next time you hit REPLY ALL please look at the list of where you are sending > and see what your mistake is. No. >> 2. The listserve is improperly configured. The reply-to should be the list >> so all I have to do is hit reply. Replying to individuals on the list is >> stupid, defeats the entire purpose of listserves in the first place. The >> most COMMON case is to reply to the list yet this list isn't configured for >> that, unlike every other listserve I'm on. > > They purposefully did it that way. Whether you or I agree with it is > immaterial. That is the way it is and we have to deal with it. You have a problem with the combination of a list default behavior and my default behavior and are simply choosing to complain about my default rather than the list's default. Your position is illogical and obviously biased. I will not change my behavior. You can make a request for different default listserve behavior and I would support this. >> >> 3. I'm not going to cull to: and cc: It should have the correct behavior by >> default. > > There is no "correct" behavior for lists. There are arguments pro and con > for each way. The present one is retarded. You clearly don't like the result of how it's behaving, by default. Suggesting a human should have to manually click on a field, click on your email address, and delete it, to appease you personally, is so incredibly asinine I can't even believe someone as smart as you would even propose it. It's pretty inexplicable why you'd ask a human being to engage in this level of parsing and effort every single time they reply to any email, let alone you personally. It's truly an arrogant and narcissistic request of enormous magnitude. The f'n listserve is improperly configured. > You are still responsible for the mail you send. I have no problem with the email I send. You have a problem with the email received. Send all of my emails automatically to the trash then. Chris Murphy_______________________________________________ MacOSX-admin mailing list [email protected] http://www.omnigroup.com/mailman/listinfo/macosx-admin
