On Aug 10, 2010, at 9:32 AM, Jared Earle wrote: > On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Jonathon Kuo > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Aug 9, 2010, at 7:27 PM, Michael_google gmail_Gersten wrote: > > > 4 GB is plenty of memory. You should not need that much. > > How rude... the new Safari was approaching 2.5 GB of VM, then it blew. Bits > flew everywhere. Looks like it still suffers from 'VM bloat'. I've tried this > before, closing all windows and emptying the cache, but Safari jealously > holds onto all the VM it can -- and never reuses it. Load a new page, and its > VM size increases still more. Something's wrong architecturally, methinks... > > VM isn't that big a deal. my VM is currently at 220GB: > > PhysMem: 879M wired, 1424M active, 172M inactive, 2475M used, 9813M free. > VM: 220G vsize, 1042M framework vsize, 83722(1) pageins, 0(0) pageouts.
I think that's total VM usage across all processes: PhysMem: 787M wired, 4734M active, 1514M inactive, 7035M used, 1156M free. VM: 291G vsize, 1040M framework vsize, 516579(0) pageins, 486(0) pageouts. I meant only the VM used by the Safari process, VSIZE: PID COMMAND %CPU TIME #TH #WQ #PORT #MREG RPRVT RSHRD RSIZE VSIZE 403 Safari 21.4 03:06:48 20 2 1065 7065 515M 219M 810M 15794M
_______________________________________________ MacOSX-talk mailing list [email protected] http://www.omnigroup.com/mailman/listinfo/macosx-talk
