Bruce Van Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At 8:22 AM +0200 7/31/01, Peter Hartmann wrote:
> >Anyway, to take a bit of time to provide a final MacPerl 68k access page in
> >my opinion is much better than to make Chris e. al. go thru all the hassle
> >of providing support for all kinds of antique systems and hardware.
>
> Excellent idea!
Yes, a very good idea.
Anyway I think it is quit sad dropping 68k MacPerl development, but
this feelings are emotional but not rational ;-)
If there are a lot of hassles to support 68k I would say, lets drop
68k MacPerl.
I wonder which problems Chris faces. I did some testing on a SE/30
and it didn't look too bad. If it is just a GUI thing -- which seems
IMHO one of the main problems to solve before we get a beta release
-- we could drop the 68k Application, but I don't see any reason for
dropping the 68k MPW-tool. Toolserver + 68k tool is still a powerfull
combination. So if it is possible to develop the 68k tool without too
much extra work for Chris, dropping the application but not the tool
seems to be a good way to go.
Andreas Marcel
